Introduction
Ischemic stroke is a leading cause of death and disability. Many neuroprotective pharmacological agents have been pre-clinically tested in animal models to reduce the stroke injury, but they all failed to be translated to the clinic. To date, tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and mechanical thrombectomy are the only two effective treatments for ischemic stroke, with tPA being the only pharmacological U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved thrombolytic therapy [1,2]. With the failure of pharmacological agents that target single pathways, other approaches are pursued to stimulate brain self-protection. These approaches aim to exploit multiple endogenous protective pathways triggered by preconditioning to induce neuroprotection. Preconditioning is the concept of applying small doses of a lethal insult to protect against later lethal doses. Ischemic preconditioning involves short durations of ischemia that protect against later longer and more lethal durations. Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) uses brief alternate episodes of ischemia/reperfusion to a distant organ, like the limbs, which can in turn provide protection to the heart or the brain if subjected to prolonged ischemia later [3]. Exercise is a form of preconditioning that bears similarities to ischemic preconditioning. We have recently reviewed the role of RIC in providing neuroprotection to the brain in different neurological ischemic diseases like stroke and vascular cognitive impairment [4]. This review will focus on the role of exercise preconditioning in offering neuroprotection in stroke.
Exercise preconditioning provides brief ischemic episodes that can protect the body from the detrimental effects of subsequent prolonged ischemic attacks like myocardial infarction or stroke [5]. Clinical observational studies showed that exercise reduces not only the risk of stroke, but also reduces the severity of the injury after stroke. However, the exact mechanism through which exercise reduces the risk and severity of stroke is not clear. Revealing and understanding the underlying mechanisms is paramount in developing novel therapeutic approaches as exercise pharmacological mimetics to enhance stroke therapy. This review will cover the findings from clinical studies about the impact of exercise on stroke risk and severity, and the different preconditioning exercise animal models employed in stroke in order to reveal the underlying mechanisms through which exercise improves stroke outcomes.
Physical exercise and ischemic stroke: clinical evidence
In the 1950s, Morris et al. [6] first demonstrated the cardiovascular benefits of physical exercise in the London Transport Workers Study. Physical exercise refers to all forms of physical activity, whether it is a daily life activity or an exercise routine. Morris et al. [7] found that conductors who ascended steps all day had half the rate of sudden cardiac death as the sedentary drivers of London double decker buses. Physical exercise has been shown to lower blood pressure, improve the lipids profile, aid weight loss, increase insulin sensitivity and reduce the risk of diabetes [8-12]. In addition, physical exercise was shown to improve endothelial function, reduce blood viscosity, fibrinogen levels, platelet aggregability and enhance fibrinolysis [13-16]. However, the impact of pre-stroke physical exercise on stroke risk, severity, and post-stroke outcomes is not clear.
Physical exercise reduces stroke risk
Findings from the Honolulu Heart Program showed that physical exercise reduced the risk of stroke among more than 7,000 men over 22 years follow-up study [17]. The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1 (NHANES 1) follow-up study showed that physical inactivity is associated with increased risk of stroke incidence in both men and women [18]. In the Northern Manhattan Stroke Study, leisure time physical exercise was related to a decreased occurrence of stroke in an elderly, urban, multi-ethnic population [19]. In 2003, Lee et al. [20] showed in a large meta-analysis study that higher physical exercise was associated with lower risk of stroke incidence and mortality. In 2009, Willey et al. [21] showed that moderate to heavy physical exercise was associated with reduction in stroke risk in men but not in women. The Harvard Alumni Health Study also showed that physical exercise was associated with decreased stroke risk [22]. However, the group showed a U-shaped relation where there was less reduction in the risk with higher levels of physical exercise [22]. In a prospective study of over a million women in the United Kingdom, moderate physical exercise reduced the risk of venous thromboembolism, coronary heart disease, and cerebrovascular disease [23]. However, there appeared to be a U-shaped dose response with a loss of protection against these cardiovascular events in women with more intense physical exercise. While most of the observational studies focused on the effect of long term (years) effects of physical exercise before the stroke, one study by Krarup et al. [24] recruited stroke patients from hospitals covering Copenhagen City investigated the effect of physical exercise performed during the week preceding an ischemic stroke. The study showed that stroke patients were less physically active in the week before stroke than age and sex matched controls [24]. As shown in this section, findings from clinical studies showed that physical exercise reduces the risk of stroke incidence (Table 1).
Physical exercise reduces the severity of stroke injury and improves functional outcomes
Clinical observational studies showed a positive correlation between pre-stroke exercise and better stroke outcomes [25]. Pre-stroke exercise was associated with reduced stroke injury and improved functional outcomes [25]. This was indicated by a significant reduction in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores in the pre-stroke exercise patients groups. Data collected for patients enrolled in the Ischemic Stroke Genetics Study showed that higher levels of pre-stroke physical exercise were associated with better functional outcomes at enrollment and 3 months after stroke [26].
A recent systematic study in 2021 showed that pre-stroke physical exercise may be associated with reduction in admission stroke severity [27]. The study showed that pre-stroke exercise was associated with reduction in infarct size, reduced risk factors for stroke and distal occlusion [27]. In 2020, Damsbo et al. [28] showed that pre-stroke exercise was associated with better cognitive performance at 1 and 6 months after stroke. In 2018, Reinholdsson et al. [29] showed that light exercise like walking 4 hours/week or moderate exercise of 2 to 3 hours/week, both were associated with less severe stroke and better functional outcomes as indicated by lower NIHSS scores. On the other side, physical inactivity was associated with increased stroke severity [29]. Deplanque et al. [30,31] showed that leisure-time exercise was associated with less stroke severity, better short-term stroke outcomes, reduction in neurological deficits and improvement in functional outcomes. In 2015, Ursin et al. [32] also showed that pre-stroke exercise demonstrated significant association with improved functional outcomes after stroke. In 2017, Wen et al. [33] showed that pre-stroke exercise for at least 30 minutes a day, three times a week, was associated with reduced stroke injury, lower mortality rate and better functional outcomes. In a sub study of the ExStroke Pilot trial in Denmark, physical exercise prior to stroke was associated with less severe stroke and better long-term outcome [34]. An interesting study published in 2017 showed that the level of physical exercise the week before the incidence of stroke correlated significantly to a reduction in the 24-hour cerebral infarct size in stroke patients treated with remote ischemic perconditioning (RIPerC) in addition to IV tPA [35]. In 2014, Ricciardi et al. [36] also showed that pre-stroke exercise was associated with better functional outcomes, less stroke severity at admission, early arterial recanalization, and smaller final infarct size. An interesting study in 2017 showed that pre-stroke exercise was associated with an increase in serum level of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). This increase in VEGF levels correlated to improvement in functional outcomes and reduction in infarct size compared to physically inactive patients [37]. A prospective study, that was part of the Women’s Health Initiative in the United States, showed that pre-stroke physical activity was associated with lower post-stroke mortality in older women [38]. In conclusion, findings from the above-mentioned clinical studies showed that pre-stroke physical exercise was associated with lower stroke severity, smaller infarcts and better functional outcomes (Table 2).
Preconditioning exercise and ischemic stroke: preclinical evidence
In this section, we are going to cover: (1) The different preconditioning exercise animal models employed in stroke; (2) The impact of preconditioning exercise on stroke outcomes; (3) The underlying mechanisms through which preconditioning exercise reduces the neurovascular injury and improve stroke outcomes.
Preconditioning exercise experimental models and impact on stroke outcomes
Preconditioning exercise refers to providing pre-stroke exercise in animal models as sort of conditioning to improve stroke outcomes. Preclinical studies showed that preconditioning exercise reduced the neurovascular injury and improved stroke outcomes (Table 3).
Tahamtan et al. [39] showed that rats subjected to treadmill running for 3 weeks prior to stroke showed better outcomes than non-exercised rats. Preconditioning exercise reduced neuronal injury and this was associated with improved novel object recognition, beam walk, and adhesive removal scores [39]. Shamsaei et al. [40] showed that subjecting rats to pre-stroke treadmill running for 4 weeks had significantly reduced brain edema and neurological deficits after stroke. Chen et al. [41] showed that forced non-electric shock running wheel (FNESRW) training for 3 weeks before stroke led to enhancement of motor and neurological functions and significant reduction in infarct volumes. However, the FNESRW-induced improvement was similar to that seen with treadmill training [41].
Although it was shown that preconditioning exercise can induce post-stroke neurovascular protection, the mechanisms through which exercise offers this protection is still not completely clear. It is likely a combination of multiple and highly interacting pathways rather than just a single mechanism. In this section, we are going to investigate the underlying mechanisms through which preconditioning exercise reduces the neurovascular injury and improves outcomes in stroke.
Mechanisms of exercise-induced neurovascular protection in stroke
Immunomodulation, matrix metalloproteases, and blood-brain barrier
Upregulation of inflammatory cytokines and increased activity of matrix metalloproteases (MMPs) during the acute phase after stroke exacerbates the stroke injury [42,43]. Preconditioning exercise was found to reduce the neurovascular injury and blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption after stroke through modulating the immune response and MMPs activity [44-53]. In 2010, Zwagerman et al. [44] showed that pre-stroke exercise reduced Toll-like receptor-4 (TLR-4) expression within the brain after stroke and this correlated to reduced infarct size. In 2016, Zhu et al. [45] showed that exercise preconditioning for 3 weeks prior to ischemia/reperfusion injury has significantly reduced brain infarction and neurological deficits. This was associated with a reduction in the expression of TLR-4 and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) in the ischemic brain, and reduction in the concentrations of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) and interleukin-1β (IL-1β) in the peripheral serum in exercised group [45]. Studies by Guo et al. [46] and Chaudhry et al. [47] showed that preconditioning exercise for 3 weeks prior to middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) has led to reduction in post-stroke expression of MMP9. This was associated with reduction in BBB disruption after stroke, reduced neuronal apoptosis, and increased microvascular integrity [46,47]. The same group also showed that preconditioning exercise increased the pre-stroke induction of TNFα. This led to a reduction in post-stroke MMP9 expression which was associated with reduction in BBB disruption and improved stroke outcomes [48]. However, these findings were controversial and contradicted with the prevailing dogma that TNFα is deleterious and worsens stroke outcomes, especially during the acute phase of stroke injury. Moreover, TNFα leads to activation rather than downregulation of MMP9. However, the group interpreted this contradiction by estimating the beneficial role TNFα can play if upregulated before rather than after the ischemic insult [49]. The group supported this interpretation by their earlier findings in 2005. They showed that pre-stroke exercise inhibits post-stroke inflammation by decreasing expression of inflammatory mediators and reducing leukocytes infiltration leading to reduced brain damage. They also showed that exercise-induced increase in the expression of TNFα before stroke may prevent the downstream inflammatory events that may regularly occur if TNFα is acutely elevated after stroke [50]. This was further supported by the same group in 2006. Using the same exercise model, they showed that the preconditioning exercise-induced increase in TNFα led to reduction in expression of TNFα receptors in the brain after stroke, and this was associated with reduction in infarct size. To further support their findings, the group simulated the in vivo study in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC). They showed that HUVEC cells pretreated with TNFα demonstrated reduced cellular expression of TNFα receptors when subjected hypoxia/reoxygenation conditions [51].
In 2004, Li et al. [52] showed that pre-stroke treadmill exercise for 3 weeks reduced infarct size in models of transient MCAO but not in models of permanent stroke. Nevertheless, a recent study in 2018 by Naderi et al. [53] showed that preconditioning exercise can still induce neuroprotection in a permanent MCAO mouse model. However, the group used a completely different animal model. They investigated the impact of preconditioning exercise in ovariectomized female mice with or without administration of 17β-estradiol. They found that exercise alone or in combination with estradiol significantly reduced infarct size and improved neurological outcomes. This was associated with reduction in serum concentration of MMP9 and increase in IL-10 [53].
Cerebral integrins, aquaporin, and brain edema
In 2006, Ding et al. [54] showed that 3 weeks of treadmill preconditioning training upregulated the expression of cerebral integrins which led to an increase in the neurovascular integrity. This led to reduction in brain injury demonstrated by reduction in brain infarction and edema after stroke [54]. He et al. [55] showed that preconditioning treadmill training for 2 weeks led to a significant reduction in cerebral expression of aquaporin 4. This was associated with reduced cerebral edema and BBB leakage after stroke [55].
VEGF, angiopoietin, and cerebral angiogenesis
In 2004, Ding et al. [56] conducted a study to examine whether exercise can induce the expression of VEGF and angiopoietin, and whether they correlate to good outcomes after stroke. They found that pre-stroke treadmill exercise significantly increased the expression of mRNA of VEGF, angiopoietin and increased microvascular density. The improved angiogenesis was associated with reduced infarct size and improved neurological outcome after stroke [56]. In a comparison of two different running exercise models, Rezaei et al. [57] showed that pre-stroke high intensity interval training (HIIT) produced better outcomes than moderate intensity continuous training. HIIT induced smaller cerebral infarction and better neurological outcomes. This was associated with higher levels of VEGF-A and VEGF-R2 in the brains of animals subjected HIIT [57]. In 2014, Gao et al. [58] showed that pre-stroke treadmill exercise induced better neurological recovery and smaller infarcts after stroke. This was associated with significant increase in caveolin-1 and VEGF expression. Moreover, this group showed that the administration of daidzen (caveolin-1 inhibitor) to the exercised rats increased the infarct size, worsened the neurological recovery, and reduced VEGF expression. Obviously, caveolin-1 inhibition abolished the exercise-induced benefits. Consequently, they concluded that caveolin-1 pathway is involved in the regulation of VEGF induced angiogenesis in the ischemic penumbra of rat brains after treadmill exercise [58].
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor
In 2004, Ding et al. [59] showed that treadmill exercising for 3 weeks before stroke significantly reduced brain infarcts and neurological deficits after stroke through increased expression of nerve growth factor (NGF), brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and increased microvascular density. Later in 2006, the same group using the same exercise model showed that preconditioning exercise significantly improved the brain’s cerebrovascular integrity by reducing brain edema and reducing the ischemia-induced ultrastructural alteration in endothelial-matrix-astrocyte interfaces after stroke compared to non-exercised rats [60]. Otsuka et al. [61] showed that preconditioning treadmill running for 3 weeks before stroke significantly reduced the infarct size, neurological deficits, and improved motor functions. This was associated with an increased expression of midkine and BDNF, increased astrocytes proliferation and increased angiogenesis in the brain.
Endothelial nitric oxide synthase, nitric oxide, and cerebral blood flow
Endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) is a vascular endothelial enzyme that upon activation leads to the production of nitric oxide (NO). NO is a potent vasodilator and platelet aggregation inhibitor. Exercise is believed to promote neuroprotective effects at least in part through eNOS activation.
In 2003, Endres et al. [62] showed that mice subjected to either voluntary running for 21 days or treadmill running for 3 weeks prior to stroke experienced better outcomes compared to non-exercised mice. They found that preconditioning exercise increased eNOS activation, NO production, and cerebral blood flow (CBF). This was associated with reduction in infarct size and improvement in neurological scores [62]. In 2006, Gertz et al. [63] showed also that 3 weeks of voluntary running prior to stroke increased eNOS activity and this was associated with elevated cerebral neovascularization and enhanced post-stroke long-term recovery and outcomes. By the end of 2019, an interesting study by Hafez et al. [64] showed that short-term exercise can induce eNOS activation and improve stroke outcomes. Hafez et al. [64] showed that short-term acute bouts of HIIT for less than 1 week have increased eNOS activation in the brain and cerebral vasculature in rats subjected to thromboembolic stroke. This was associated with reduction in brain infarction, brain edema and improvement in functional outcomes. The group showed that acute bouts of HIIT offer immediate neuroprotection that can last for up to 72 hours after the last exercise session [64].
Endothelin and cerebral blood flow
Endothelin-1 is a potent vasoconstrictor. In 2014, Zhang et al. [65] showed that preconditioning treadmill training significantly reduced post-stroke endothelin-1 expression and increased CBF and this was associated with improvements in stroke outcomes.
Glutamate and excitotoxicity
Glutamate is an excitatory neurotransmitter and its elevation during the acute phase after stroke is one of main causes of induced neurotoxicity, neuronal injury, and infarction [66,67]. In 2009, Jia et al. [68] showed that treadmill training for at least 2 weeks before stroke has significantly reduced glutamate release and increased the release of gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) in the brain during the acute phase of cerebral ischemia-reperfusion. However, the group did not study the effect of these changes on outcomes. Consequently, In 2010, Zhang et al. [69] showed that preconditioning exercise-induced reduction in glutamate release has significantly reduced brain infarction and neurological deficits after stroke.
In 2012, Yang et al. [70] showed that rats stroked after being subjected to treadmill training for 2 weeks demonstrated an increase in the expression of glutamate transporter 1 (GLT-1) in brain tissue, which caused a reduction in extracellular glutamate concentration. This was associated with reduction in infarct size and improvement in neurobehavioral outcomes [70]. Furthermore, Wang et al. [71] showed in 2014 that pre-ischemic treadmill training exercise reduced brain infarct volume, edema and neurological deficits through upregulating the expression of protein kinase C-α, GLT-1, Akt, and phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase in the brain after ischemic stroke. Moreover, preconditioning exercise also reduced the expression of glutamate receptors like metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunit type 2B after stroke and this was associated with better stroke outcomes [72].
Caspase activity and neuronal apoptosis
Increased caspase activity after stroke is one of the mechanisms that lead to neuronal apoptosis. Shamsaei et al. [73] and Aboutaleb et al. [74] showed that preconditioning exercise for 4 weeks prior to stroke significantly reduced neuronal cell death and prevented the ischemia-induced memory dysfunction by reducing Bax/Bcl2 ratio and caspase activity in the brain. In 2019, Terashi et al. [75] investigated the impact of exercise frequency on neuroprotection after stroke. Rats were subjected to treadmill training for either one, three, or five times a week for 3 weeks before stroke. The group found that the three and five times/week groups, but not the once-a-week group, showed significant reduction in infarct size and improvement in neurological outcomes. This was associated with reduction in the expression of caspase-3 and neuronal apoptosis. These findings concluded that at least three times of pre-stroke exercise sessions per week are required to exert post-stroke neuroprotective effects [75]. Otsuka et al. [61,76] showed that preconditioning exercise for 3 weeks prior to stroke caused a reduction in the expression of Bax, caspase 3, and nitrotyrosine. This was associated with reduced neuronal apoptosis.
HIF-1 alpha and cerebral metabolism
Hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs) are transcription factors that respond to changes in oxygen availability in the cellular environment. HIF-1α regulates the transcription of many downstream genes that regulate cellular adaptation to hypoxia like glucose transporters (GLUTs), glycolytic enzymes, and VEGF [77,78]. One of the potential mechanisms offered by preconditioning exercise is elevating HIF-1α levels after stroke to rescue the tissue from oxygen deprivation.
In 2018, Otsuka et al. [76] showed that pre-stroke exercise for 3 weeks significantly increased the expression of HIF-1α and 14-3-3γ (ischemia-inducible protective factor) in neurons and astrocytes. This was associated with a significant reduction in brain infarction and neuronal death after stroke [76]. In 2013, Dornbos et al. [79] showed that preconditioning exercise reduced brain damage after stroke by ameliorating metabolic disorders. Rats subjected to stroke after 3 weeks of preconditioning exercise showed significant increase in HIF-1α and adenosine monophosphate activated kinase (AMPK) levels during the acute phase after stroke which indicated reduction in metabolic disorder. GLUT1, GLUT3, and phosphofructokinase (PFK) were also increased in exercised rats showing an enhanced glycolysis and increased adenosine triphosphate production [79,80]. In 2015, Wang et al. [81] also showed that exercise preconditioning reduced the infarct volume through upregulation of HIF-1α expression.
In 2008, Hayes et al. [82] conducted a study to investigate the differential effects of forced versus voluntary preconditioning exercise-induced neuroprotection after stroke. Forced exercise was demonstrated by treadmill running at speed of 30 m/min, 30 minutes a day, 5 days/week, for 3 weeks. The treadmill was composed of channels with an electric shock grid built into each channel, which can stimulate the rats to run. Voluntary exercise was achieved by housing the animals individually in cages with a running wheel assembly connected to a switch that counted each revolution of the wheel and were recorded daily for 3 weeks. Hayes et al. [82] showed that the forced exercise group had smaller infarct size compared to the voluntary group. The level of stress was significantly higher in the forced group compared to the voluntary group, as indicated by the serum corticosterone levels. The group also showed that the expression of heat shock protein-27 (HSP-27) and HSP-70 was significantly higher in the forced exercise group. The group concluded that the better induced neuroprotection with forced exercise may be attributed to the upregulation of stress induced HSP-27 and -70. They showed that forced exercise with a stressful component is neuroprotective. The group showed the benefits of combination of physical exercise in conjunction with stress, where strenuous exercise is the key factor which provides the stress element. So, the forced exercise regimen may have provided better outcomes because it was more strenuous [82]. Later in 2011, Kinni et al. [83] used the same animal models to investigate the differential effects of forced versus voluntary pre-ischemic exercise on cerebral metabolism. They showed that forced exercise induced a significant increase in cerebral glycolysis indicated by the increase in expression of GLUT-1, GLUT-3, PFK, and HIF-1α, and increased AMPK activity, compared to voluntary exercise. The findings suggested that the difference in cerebral metabolism may also be an additional reason behind the better neuroprotection induced by forced exercise [83].
Heat shock proteins
Several studies showed that HSPs play a crucial role in mediating the beneficial effects of preconditioning exercise on stroke outcomes. Lin et al. [84] showed that exercise preconditioning increased the number of HSP-20 containing neurons and astrocytes. This was associated with reduced brain infarcts after stroke, reduced neuronal and glial apoptosis and reduced neurological deficits. Intracerebral injection of small interfering RNA that reduces the neuronal and glial expression of HSP-20 (pSUPER) significantly reversed the exercise-induced benefits [84]. Liebelt et al. [85] subjected rats to 30 minutes/day running on treadmill for either 1, 2, or 3 weeks before stroke aiming to determine the least effective exercise period that can induce improvements in stroke outcomes. They showed that only the 3 weeks group showed significant reduction in neuronal apoptosis and brain infarction. However, the group induced stroke by intraluminal suture occlusion. They found that preconditioning exercise for 3 weeks caused a significant increase in the expression of HSP-70 and reduction in the expression of Bax and apoptosis inducing factor (AIF) [85].
ERK signaling
Guo et al. [46,48] and Chaudhry et al. [47] showed that preconditioning exercise for 3 weeks led to activation extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) which let to reduction in post-stroke expression of MMP9. This was associated with reduction in neuronal apoptosis and BBB disruption after stroke [46-48]. In 2010, Liebelt et al. [85] showed preconditioning exercise for 3 weeks significantly increased the expression of pERK1/2. This was associated with reduced neuronal apoptosis and improved stroke outcomes [85]. Moreover, Wang et al. [87] showed that treadmill training for 3 weeks prior to stroke significantly reduced infarct size and improved neurological outcomes due to increased expression of excitatory amino acid transporter-2 (EAAT-2) and decreased overexpression of ERK1/2. The same group also showed that preconditioning treadmill training increased the activity of superoxide dismutase and decreased the concentration of malondialdehyde after stroke. This was associated with reduction in infarct size and neurological deficits [88].
Conclusions
Clinical observational studies showed that regular physical exercise reduces the risk of stroke, recurrent stroke and improves outcomes and recovery after stroke [17-38]. Clinical studies have classified leisure-time physical exercise into three categories as low, moderate, or high intensity. Physical exercise sufficient to break a sweat or noticeably raise the heart rate once a week was described as low intensity. Two to three times a week was described as moderate intensity, and four or more times a week was described as high intensity [18,26,89]. Results from clinical studies showed that a dose of three to five times a week of moderate to high intensity physical exercise can reduce stroke risk and severity, and improve the outcomes [17-38]. However, the underlying mechanisms through which pre-stroke exercise can improve stroke outcomes are not clear. In this review, we aimed to uncover the underlying mechanisms through which pre-stroke exercise induces post-stroke neurovascular protection and improves outcomes.
Preclinical studies showed that preconditioning exercise reduces the neurovascular injury after stroke (Table 3) [39-88]. In correlation with the clinical findings, preclinical animal studies employed a dosage regimen of moderate to high intensity exercise three to five times a week. In most studies, moderate intensity referred to running at speed of 15 to 25 m/min, and high intensity referred to running at speed >25 m/min [39-88].
Preconditioning exercise was shown to reduce brain infarction, brain edema, BBB disruption, and improve the neurological and functional outcomes (Figure 1). The studies showed that exercise induces this neurovascular protection through different intermeshing mechanisms (Figure 1). These mechanisms may involve but not limited to: (1) reducing the post-stroke inflammation by reducing the expression and activity of inflammatory cytokines like TNFα, TLRs, and NF-κB after stroke [44-53]; (2) increasing angiogenesis and neovascularization through increasing the expression of VEGF and VEGF receptors, caveolin, and angiopoietin in the brain [56-58]; (3) increasing the BBB integrity and reducing disruption through reducing the post-stroke expression of MMPs and increasing the expression of integrins proteins [46-48,54,55]; (4) increasing post-stroke CBF by increasing eNOS activation and NO production [62-64]; and (5) increasing neurogenesis and reducing neuronal apoptosis through activation of HIF-1α, HSPs, BDNF, and inhibition of glutamate and caspase activities [68-86].
It is obvious that the preconditioning exercise-induced protection is due to multiple intermeshing mechanisms and pathways. The interplay between these different mechanisms and molecules in the signaling pathways can be the main cause of the ultimate neurovascular protection. As shown above, exercise increased HIF-1α in the brain which caused reduction in neuronal death, infarction, and neurological deficits [76-83]. However, HIF-1α may be mediating these positive effects through downstream molecules. HIF-1α may increase the expression and activation of AMPK, GLUTs and may enhance the glycolysis enzymes [79-82]. All these actions may lead to enhanced cerebral metabolism. In addition, HIF-1α can increase the expression of VEGF [77,78] which may lead to enhanced angiogenesis [56-58]. Moreover, VEGF can enhance the expression and activation of eNOS, which can lead to enhanced CBF [62,64]. HSPs can inhibit the major inflammatory cytokines, mainly NF-κB, which in turn may inhibit the downstream TNFα, IL-1β, and IL-6 [90,91]. Inhibition of these cytokines will consequently inhibit the activation of MMP9. Collectively, these actions will inhibit cerebral inflammation, cell death, and BBB disruption [46-48,84-86]. Inhibition of glutamate-induced excitotoxicity by exercise, may lead to reduction in neuronal apoptosis and cell death [68-76]. This may be due to reduced calcium ion intracellular influx, increased Bcl2, and reduced Bax leading to reduction in caspases activity, mainly caspase 3 [73-76]. Exercise also increased BDNF expression in the brain and induced enhanced neurogenesis and neuroplasticity [59-61].
The concept of exercise mimetics and future thoughts
Preclinical studies have uncovered many underlying mechanisms employed in the exercise-induced neuroprotection. This is paramount in developing novel therapeutic approaches through the development of exercise pharmacological and non-pharmacological mimetics to combat stroke. For example, (1) RIC shares some mechanistic approaches with exercise like inducing eNOS activation and improving CBF [4]. (2) The use of metformin was shown to induce the activation of AMPK [92], the principal upstream activator of eNOS [64]. (3) The use of VEGF mimetics and VEGF receptor agonists to promote cerebral angiogenesis. (4) The use of MMPs inhibitors to reduce post-stroke vascular injury, cerebral hemorrhage, and BBB disruption. All these are thoughts of developing novel exercise mimetics that can be employed in reducing the stroke injury and creating new hopes and therapeutic avenues in stroke management.
Limitations and gaps
Despite the huge number of preclinical studies conducted to study the impact of exercise on stroke, there are still several limitations and gaps to be filled in this field. Most if not all of the animal studies used: (1) severely intense continuous training exercise models rather than intermittent or interval training which is more relevant to human; (2) intraluminal suture occlusion stroke model which does not have high clinical relevance compared for example to the embolic stroke model; and (3) they all studied the impact of long-term preconditioning exercise without paying much attention to the impact of the short-term exercise. Only one study published recently by Hafez et al. [64] showed that short-term exercise improved stroke outcome in a clinically relevant thromboembolic stroke model. This goes along with the findings from clinical studies showing that physical exercise the week prior to stroke can reduce the risk and improve the outcomes [24,35]; and finally, (4) the use of only young male animals without studying the effects in female or aged animals. These are all gaps and considerations for future studies in the field of exercise-induced neuroprotection.
PDF Links
PubReader
ePub Link
XML Download
Full text via DOI
Download Citation
Print
