Cost-effectiveness evaluation of add-on dapagliflozin for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction from perspective of healthcare systems in Asia-Pacific region

Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021 Oct 9;20(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s12933-021-01387-3.

Abstract

Background: With emerging evidence on the efficacy of adding dapagliflozin to standard care for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), this study assessed the cost-effectiveness of add-on dapagliflozin to standard care versus standard care alone for HFrEF from the perspective of healthcare systems in the Asia-Pacific region.

Methods: A Markov model was applied to project the outcomes of treatment in terms of lifetime medical cost and quality-adjusted life-years. The transition probabilities between health states in the model were obtained from the Dapagliflozin in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction trial. Country-specific costs and utilities were extracted for modeling. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio against a country-specific willingness-to-pay threshold was applied to determine the cost-effectiveness of treatment. A series of sensitivity analyses were performed to ensure the robustness of the study results. Costs are presented in 2020 United States dollars.

Results: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for add-on dapagliflozin versus standard care alone were $5277, $9980, $12,305, $16,705, and $23,227 per quality-adjusted life-year gained in Korea, Australia, Taiwan, Japan, and Singapore, respectively. When using add-on dapagliflozin to standard care versus standard care alone, ~ 100% of simulations were cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of one gross domestic product per capita of the given Asia-Pacific country; however, the probability of being cost-effective for using add-on dapagliflozin decreased when the time horizon for simulation was restricted to 18 months and when the cardiovascular mortality for the two treatments (43.8% and 33.0%, respectively) was assumed to be the same. The cost-effectiveness results were most sensitive to cardiovascular mortality of treatment.

Conclusions: Adding dapagliflozin to standard care is cost-effective for HFrEF in healthcare systems in the Asia-Pacific region, which supports the rational use of dapagliflozin for HFrEF in this region.

Keywords: Cost-effectiveness; Dapagliflozin; Heart failure.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Asia / epidemiology
  • Australia / epidemiology
  • Benzhydryl Compounds / adverse effects
  • Benzhydryl Compounds / economics*
  • Benzhydryl Compounds / therapeutic use*
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Delivery of Health Care / economics*
  • Drug Costs*
  • Female
  • Glucosides / adverse effects
  • Glucosides / economics*
  • Glucosides / therapeutic use*
  • Heart Failure, Systolic / drug therapy*
  • Heart Failure, Systolic / economics*
  • Heart Failure, Systolic / mortality
  • Heart Failure, Systolic / physiopathology
  • Hospital Costs
  • Hospitalization / economics
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Markov Chains
  • Models, Economic
  • Quality of Life
  • Quality-Adjusted Life Years
  • Recovery of Function
  • Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors / adverse effects
  • Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors / economics
  • Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors / therapeutic use*
  • Stroke Volume / drug effects*
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Ventricular Function, Left / drug effects*

Substances

  • Benzhydryl Compounds
  • Glucosides
  • Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors
  • dapagliflozin