ReviewA comparative evaluation and appraisal of 2020 American Heart Association and 2021 European Resuscitation Council neonatal resuscitation guidelines
Introduction
Using the GRADE evaluation process, the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) 2020 Consensus on Science and Treatment Recommendations (CoSTR) for Neonatal Life Support forms the framework on which other neonatal resuscitation councils base their recommendations.1., 2., 3., 4., 5. Though most of the recommendations formulated by the different councils share a similar evidence base, some recommendations may vary.2., 3. This review aims to detail the differences between the updated ILCOR 2020 Consensus on Science and Treatment Recommendations (ILCOR 2020) for Neonatal Life Support, the American Heart Association (AHA 2020) neonatal resuscitation guidelines, and the European Resuscitation Council (ERC 2021) neonatal resuscitation guidelines and explores the reasons for such differences.1., 2., 3. Further, the quality of different domains of the AHA and ERC guidelines are evaluated using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II).6
Section snippets
Methods
The published approach to developing recommendations, the evidence gathering process, final recommendations, and cited evidence in the AHA 2020 and ERC 2021 neonatal resuscitation guidelines were compared with ILCOR CoSTR 2020.1., 2., 3. Further, the algorithms published with each of these guidelines were evaluated. The AGREE II instrument was used to evaluate the quality of AHA and ERC guidelines by two authors (VVR, TA).6 AGREE II includes 23 items organized into 6 quality domains. The
Guideline development process
ILCOR 2020 utilized three types of evidence evaluations including systematic reviews, evidence updates, and scoping reviews.1 ILCOR continued to utilize the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system for evaluating the certainty of evidence (CoE) supporting interventions.8 Draft CoSTR statements are posted on-line for public comment before final review and approval. Whilst GRADE categorizes the CoE into 4 levels (high, moderate, low, very low), the
Discussion
Although the ILCOR CoSTR reflects consensus treatment recommendations developed by resuscitation experts who come from a variety of international resuscitation councils, our review identified differences between the recently published AHA and ERC neonatal resuscitation guidelines. Most of these differences were related to interventions supported by very low to low CoE or expert opinion. In addition, AGREE II scores for these two guidelines varied for several domains.
Both AHA and ERC have
Conclusions
The guidelines of AHA and ERC are predominantly based on the ILCOR CoSTR. The differences in recommendations between the two guidelines were largely related to the evidence gathering process for questions not reviewed by ILCOR CoSTR, a paucity of evidence for recommendations based on existing regional practices and supported by expert opinion, and different interpretation or application of the same evidence base. Overall, both guidelines scored well on the AGREE II assessment but had domains
Funding sources
None.
Author contributions
Daniele Trevisanuto, Gary M. Weiner and Viraraghavan Vadakkencherry Ramaswamy conceptualized the paper. Viraraghavan Vadakkencherry Ramaswamy and Thangaraj Abiramalatha did the quality appraisal of the guidelines and produced the initial draft. Daniele Trevisanuto and Gary M. Weiner provided further intellectual inputs and revised the first draft. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript submitted to the journal for peer review.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
References (46)
- et al.
International consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations
Resuscitation
(2020) - et al.
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Newborn resuscitation and support of transition of infants at birth
Resuscitation
(2021) - et al.
European Resuscitation Council Guideline Collaborators. European resuscitation council guidelines 2021: executive summary
Resuscitation
(2021) - et al.
GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
J Clin Epidemiol
(2011) - et al.
Delayed cord clamping in newborns born at term at risk for resuscitation: a feasibility randomized clinical trial
J Pediatr
(2017) - et al.
Physiological-based cord clamping in very preterm infants - randomised controlled trial on effectiveness of stabilisation
Resuscitation
(2020) - et al.
Sustained inflations during delivery suite stabilisation in prematurely-born infants - a randomised trial
Early Hum Dev
(2019) - et al.
Physiologic responses to prolonged and slow-rise inflation in the resuscitation of the asphyxiated newborn infant
J Pediatr
(1981) - et al.
Establishment of functional residual capacity at birth: Observational study of 821 neonatal resuscitations
Resuscitation
(2020) - et al.
Prematurely born infants' response to resuscitation via an endotracheal tube or a face mask
Early Hum Dev
(2015)