Concurrent Assessment of the CardioMEMS HF System and HeartLogic HF Diagnostic: A Retrospective Case Series

Background: Heart failure (HF) causes high morbidity and mortality despite advances in medical therapy. Remote patient monitoring for HF allows for the optimization of medical therapy and prevention of HF hospitalizations. This study is the first to assess pulmonary artery diastolic pressures (PADP) using the CardioMEMS HF System (CMEMS) and cardiac implantable electronic device-based multisensor indexes (HeartLogic index [HLI]) using the HeartLogic HF Diagnostic (HL) in a small, retrospective cohort of patients with HF at a single center.

Methods and results: Any hospitalization, HF hospitalization, HF-related outpatient visit, and pulmonary artery pressure action were recorded in 7 patients with concurrent CMEMS and HL measurements for at least 1 year. The median time before both platforms were implanted and present in the same participant was 3.12 months. The median study period was 1.44 years per participant. Data availability for HL was significantly higher at 99.6% compared with 64.1% adherence for CMEMS (P = .016). Overall, PADP was only weakly correlated to HLI (r = 0.098), but there was a 2.87 mm Hg (P = .014) estimated increase in PADP during HLI alert periods versus nonalert periods. Similarly, the estimated odds of being above a PADP goal was 4.7 times higher (95% confidence interval 3.0-7.2, P < .001) in HLI alert vs nonalert periods.

Conclusions: Concurrent analysis of patients with CMEMS and HL showed an association between PADP and HLI, but the correlation was weak. However, there was a significant increase in PADP during HLI alert periods versus nonalert periods.