Effect of Paroxetine-Mediated G-Protein Receptor Kinase 2 Inhibition vs Placebo in Patients With Anterior Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized Clinical Trial

JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Oct 1;6(10):1171-1176. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.2247.

Abstract

Importance: Left ventricular remodeling following acute myocardial infarction results in progressive myocardial dysfunction and adversely affects prognosis.

Objective: To investigate the efficacy of paroxetine-mediated G-protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 inhibition to mitigate adverse left ventricular remodeling in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction.

Design, setting, and participants: This double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial was conducted at Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland. Patients with acute anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 45% or less were randomly allocated to 2 study arms between October 26, 2017, and September 21, 2020.

Interventions: Patients in the experimental arm received 20 mg of paroxetine daily; patients in the control group received a placebo daily. Both treatments were provided for 12 weeks.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary end point was the difference in patient-level improvement of LVEF between baseline and 12 weeks as assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance tomography. Secondary end points were changes in left ventricular dimensions and late gadolinium enhancement between baseline and follow-up.

Results: Fifty patients (mean [SD] age, 62 [13] years; 41 men [82%]) with acute anterior myocardial infarction were randomly allocated to paroxetine or placebo, of whom 38 patients underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging both at baseline and 12 weeks. There was no difference in recovery of LVEF between the experimental group (mean [SD] change, 4.0% [7.0%]) and the control group (mean [SD] change, 6.3% [6.3%]; mean difference, -2.4% [95% CI, -6.8% to 2.1%]; P = .29) or changes in left ventricular end-diastolic volume (mean difference, 13.4 [95% CI, -12.3 to 39.0] mL; P = .30) and end-systolic volume (mean difference, 11.4 [95% CI, -3.6 to 26.4] mL; P = .13). Late gadolinium enhancement as a percentage of the total left ventricular mass decreased to a larger extent in the experimental group (mean [SD], -13.6% [12.9%]) compared with the control group (mean [SD], -4.5% [9.5%]; mean difference, -9.1% [95% CI, -16.6% to -1.6%]; P = .02).

Conclusions and relevance: In this trial, treatment with paroxetine did not improve LVEF after myocardial infarction compared with placebo.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03274752.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Anterior Wall Myocardial Infarction / diagnosis
  • Anterior Wall Myocardial Infarction / drug therapy*
  • Anterior Wall Myocardial Infarction / physiopathology
  • Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6 Inhibitors / administration & dosage
  • Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Echocardiography / methods
  • Electrocardiography
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Heart Ventricles / diagnostic imaging*
  • Heart Ventricles / drug effects
  • Heart Ventricles / physiopathology
  • Humans
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine / methods
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Paroxetine / administration & dosage*
  • Prognosis
  • Retrospective Studies
  • ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction / diagnosis
  • ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction / drug therapy*
  • ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction / physiopathology
  • Ventricular Remodeling / drug effects*
  • Ventricular Remodeling / physiology

Substances

  • Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6 Inhibitors
  • Paroxetine

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT03274752