Elsevier

The American Journal of Cardiology

Volume 154, 1 September 2021, Pages 22-28
The American Journal of Cardiology

Effect of Atorvastatin (10 mg) and Ezetimibe (10 mg) Combination Compared to Atorvastatin (40 mg) Alone on Coronary Atherosclerosis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.05.039Get rights and content

It remains inconclusive whether the additional low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering effects of ezetimibe added to statin on coronary atherosclerosis and clinical outcomes are similar to those of statin monotherapy in the setting of comparable LDL-C reduction. We aimed to determine whether there were distinguishable differences in their effects on coronary atherosclerosis with intermediate stenosis between the combination of moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe and high-intensity statin monotherapy. Forty-one patients with stable angina undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention were randomized to receive either atorvastatin 10 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg (ATO10/EZE10) or atorvastatin 40 mg alone (ATO40). The intermediate lesions were evaluated using a near-infrared spectroscopy-intravascular ultrasonography at baseline and after 12 months in 37 patients. The primary endpoint was percent atheroma volume (PAV). Mean LDL-C levels were significantly reduced by 40% and 38% from baseline in the ATO10/EZE10 group (n = 18, from 107 mg/dL to 61 mg/dL) and ATO40 group (n = 19, from 101 mg/dL to 58 mg/dL), respectively, without between-group difference. The absolute change of PAV was −2.9% in the ATO10/EZE10 group and −3.2% in the ATO40 group. The mean difference (95% confidence interval) for the absolute change in PAV between the 2 groups was 0.5% (−2.4% to 2.8%), which did not exceed the pre-defined non-inferiority margin of 5%. There was no significant reduction in lipid core burden index in both groups. In conclusion, the combination of atorvastatin 10 mg and ezetimibe 10 mg showed comparable LDL-C lowering and regression of coronary atherosclerosis in the intermediate lesions, compared with atorvastatin 40 mg alone.

Section snippets

Methods

This is a prospective, open-label, randomized, single-center study with blind endpoint evaluation. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board and informed consent was obtained from each patient. In patients aged ≥19 years with suspected stable angina pectoris, coronary angiography was performed and culprit lesions with severe stenosis were treated with a percutaneous coronary intervention using the standard techniques. After the successful angioplasty, patients with an

Results

A total of 41 patients with CAD who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention were enrolled in this study between May 2017 and July 2019 and were randomly assigned to ATO10/EZE10 group (n = 20) or ATO40 group (n = 21) (Figure 1). Three patients (7%) lost to follow-up. One patient in the ATO40 group was withdrawn from the study due to the development of myalgia. Finally, a total of 37 patients underwent a follow-up NIRS-IVUS examination and finished the study protocol (n = 18 in the

Discussion

The main findings of this study were as follows: (1) 2 different lipid-lowering treatments, atorvastatin 40 mg alone and atorvastatin 10 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg combination showed comparable LDL-C reduction and significantly regressed coronary atherosclerosis in the intermediate stenotic lesion to the similar degree, (2) patients with regression of the lipid core had significantly lower levels of atherogenic lipoproteins (LDL-C and apolipoprotein B) and inflammatory marker (hs-CRP), compared

Author Contribution

Pyung Chun Oh: Conceptualization, Methods, Investigation, Resources, Data curation, Visualization, Writing – original draft; Albert Youngwoo Jang: Software, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Data curation; Kyungeun Ha: Investigation, Resources, Data curation; Writing – review & editing, Minsu Kim: Formal analysis, Visualization; Jeonggeun Moon: Conceptualization, Validation, Supervision; Soon Yong Suh: Validation, Supervision; Kyounghoon Lee: Validation, Supervision; Seung Hwan Han:

Disclosures

The authors report no relationships that could be construed as a conflict of interest.

References (19)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Funding: This work was supported by the Chong Kun Dang Pharmaceutical Corporation, Republic of Korea. The funder had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

View full text