Effect of nurse-supported care on pain management in women undergoing caesarean delivery: a comparative study

Lancet. 2021 Jul:398 Suppl 1:S24. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01510-5.

Abstract

Background: Pain management after caesarean delivery is important because acute pain in the postoperative period is associated with persistent pain, increased opioid use and postpartum depression, and delayed functional recovery. We investigated the role of nurse-supported care in acute pain management after caesarean delivery, which as far as we know has not previously been investigated in Gaza.

Methods: This was a comparative study done from March, 2018, to October, 2018, among women assigned to undergo caesarean delivery. Research nurses at the Al-Helal Al-Emirati Hospital, Rafah, Gaza Strip, occupied Palestinian territory, were trained to give supportive pain management care to women after caesarean delivery, including individualised care and educational sessions on pain, nutrition, exercise, and wound care. Women were randomly assigned to receive nurse-supported care or usual care. Pain assessment scales (range 1-5, where 1=no pain and 5=pain as bad as it could be) were used to record pain at 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 h after caesarean delivery. The time from the end of the caesarean delivery to the first request for analgesia and the total amounts and types of analgesics (pethidine ampules, diclofenac ampules, or indometacin suppositories) used in the first 24 h were recorded as primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes were nausea and vomiting scores (0-3, where 0=no nausea or vomiting and 3=severe and unresponsive to antiemetic drugs), sedation scores (0-3, where 0=patient awake and 3=severe sedation and patient difficult to rouse), and pruritis scores (0-2, where 0=no pruritis and 2=severe pruritis needing treatment). Data were analysed with SPSS (version 22.0). Groups were compared by using the Student's t-test and χ2. P values less than 0·05 were significant. The study was approved by the Ministry of Health and Helsinki Committee, Gaza Strip. Women provided verbal informed consent for inclusion in the study when they were assigned to the caesarean delivery.

Findings: 108 women participated, with a mean age of 29·2 years (SD 5·50). 49 women were randomly assigned to nurse-supported care and 59 to usual care. Pain was reduced in the nurse-supported care group compared with in the usual care group at 12 h (mean score 1·15 [SD 0·25] vs 1·60 [0·67], p=0·002) and at 18 h (1·08 [0·22] vs 1·26 [0·21], p=0·049) but did not differ significantly at other times. The time to first requesting analgesia was shorter in the nurse-supported care group than in the usual care group (mean 3·38 h [SD 1·01] vs 6·16 h [2·01], p=0·038). The proportions of women who asked for a first analgesic were similar in the two groups (30 [61%] and 36 [61%]), whereas seven (14%) women in the nurse-supported care group requested a second analgesic compared with 13 (22%) in the usual care group (p=0·045). There were no significant differences between the two groups for nausea and vomiting, sedation, or pruritis.

Interpretation: Nurse-supported care provided better analgesia than usual care in women who had undergone caesarean delivery. A multicentre study is needed to explore the types, duration, and repeatability of the effects of nurse supportive care on pain perception and duration of hospital stay after caesarean delivery.

Funding: None.