Original Article
Prediction of 2-year major adverse cardiac events from myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and clinical risk factors

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-021-02617-7Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

We developed CRAX2MACE, a new tool derived from clinical and SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) variables, to predict 2-year probability of major adverse cardiac event (MACE) comprising death, hospitalized acute myocardial infarction or coronary revascularization.

Methods

Consecutive individuals with SPECT MPI 2001-2008 had two-year MACE determined from population-based health services data. CRAX2MACE included age, sex, diabetes, recent cardiac hospitalization, pharmacologic stress, stress total perfusion deficit (TPD), ischemic (stress-rest) TPD, left ventricular ejection fraction and transient ischemic dilation ratio. Two-year event rates were classified as low (< 5%), moderate (5.0-9.9%), high (10-19.9%) and very high (20% or greater).

Results

The study population comprised 3896 individuals for the development and 1946 for the validation subgroups with subsequent MACE in 589 (15.1%) and 272 (14.0%), respectively. CRAX2MACE, derived from the development subgroups, accurately stratified MACE risk in the validation subgroup (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve 0.79) with stepwise increase in the observed event rate with increasing predicted risk category (low, 2.3%; moderate, 5.5%; high, 18.8%; very high 33.2%; P-trend < 0.001).

Conclusions

A simple tool based upon clinical risk factors and MPI variables predicts 2-year cardiac events. Risk stratification between the low and very high groups was greater than tenfold.

Introduction

Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains the principle cause of death in developed countries despite major advances in both the medical and interventional approaches to management, with an emerging epidemic among low- and middle-income countries which are now responsible for overwhelming majority of cardiovascular disease worldwide.1,2 Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is a powerful technique to assess for the presence and severity of CAD, and is predictive of both short-term and long-term cardiac events.3, Clinical risk factors and derived composite scores are also widely used to stratify risk for CAD and related outcomes.4 To date, there have been limited attempts to quantitatively integrate MPI and clinical risk factors into a unified risk measure that could potentially be used to generate a personalized risk profile and guide treatment, although several prognostic risk models have been developed and adopted for non-MPI laboratory and imaging measures.5

There is increasing consensus that therapeutic intervention should be personalized based upon an individual’s level of risk and anticipated benefit.6, 7, 8 An accurate assessment of baseline risk is therefore an essential component of this process. A previous study provided proof-of-concept that a prediction tool, CRAX, for five-year death and 5-year acute myocardial infarction (AMI) based upon fully automated MPI analysis and clinical risk factors was feasible.9 Limitations of CRAX included the relatively long time horizon of 5 years. Moreover, diabetes was not included in this model though studies document the importance of diabetes as an important risk factor for adverse cardiac outcomes even when adjusted for MPI variables, and as a CAD equivalent.10, 11, 12

The objective of the current analysis was to develop a new clinical prediction tool, CRAX2MACE, to predict 2-year probability of major adverse cardiac event (MACE) that comprised death, hospitalized AMI or coronary revascularization. Clinical risk factors and MPI variables were included in the prediction algorithm which was developed and internally validated in a large clinical cohort.

Section snippets

Demographics

The study cohort and methods have been previously described in detail.9,13 Briefly, we identified consecutive individuals who underwent stress-rest SPECT myocardial imaging at St. Boniface Hospital, Winnipeg, the regional cardiac center for the province of Manitoba (1.3 million), for suspected coronary artery disease between February 2001 and July 2008. We excluded subjects due to incomplete or corrupted scan data. In addition, studies being performed as follow-up to a previous scan were

Results

The study population consisted of 3896 individuals for the development subgroup (mean age 64.7 ± 12.0 years, 52.9% male) and 1946 for the validation subgroup (mean age 65.1 ± 11.5 years, 51.3% male). The development and validation subgroups were well balanced in terms of the model variables (Table 1).

During two years of follow-up, the primary MACE outcome occurred in 589 (15.1%) and 272 (14.0%) of the development and validation subgroups, respectively. The secondary endpoint of AMI or death

Discussion

A simple tool for prediction of 2-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was constructed and internally validated based upon relevant clinical risk factors and MPI variables. Risk stratification between the low risk and very high risk groups was greater than tenfold for the primary combined endpoint. Good risk stratification was also seen for the individual outcomes, and when MACE outcomes were evaluated over 5 years.

Many studies have demonstrated the ability of both visual

New Knowledge Gained

A simple prediction tool based upon a small number of clinical and MPI variables was found to stratify 2-year risk for MACE. Further studies are warranted to see whether this can be incorporated into routine clinical reporting of MPI and ultimately contribute to individualized patient decision-making and improved clinical outcomes.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy for use of data contained in the Population Health Research Data Repository (HIPC 2012/2013-18). The results and conclusions are those of the authors and no official endorsement by the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, Manitoba Health, Healthy Living, and Seniors, or other data providers are intended or should be inferred.

Declarations

Disclosure

W. Leslie, M. Bryanton and A. Goertzen declare that they have no conflict of interest. P. Slomka participates in

References (30)

  • BetancurJ et al.

    Prognostic value of combined clinical and myocardial perfusion imaging data using machine learning

    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging

    (2018)
  • BauersachsR et al.

    Burden of coronary artery disease and peripheral artery disease: A literature review

    Cardiovasc Ther

    (2019)
  • GarciaEV et al.

    Quantitative clinical nuclear cardiology, Part 1: Established applications

    J Nucl Cardiol

    (2019)
  • BuccheriS et al.

    Risk stratification in patients with coronary artery disease: A practical walkthrough in the landscape of prognostic risk models

    Interv Cardiol

    (2018)
  • PaulusJK et al.

    Predictably unequal: Understanding and addressing concerns that algorithmic clinical prediction may increase health disparities

    NPJ Digit Med

    (2020)
  • Cited by (5)

    • External validation of the CRAX2MACE model

      2023, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

    The authors of this article have provided a PowerPoint file, available for download at SpringerLink, which summarises the contents of the paper and is free for re-use at meetings and presentations. Search for the article DOI on SpringerLink.com.

    All editorial decisions for this article, including selection of reviewers and the final decision, were made by guest editor Randall Thompson, MD.

    View full text