Transvenous lead extraction in patients with persistent left superior vena cava

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 May;32(5):1407-1410. doi: 10.1111/jce.15021. Epub 2021 Apr 16.

Abstract

Purpose: Predictors of difficulty and complications of transvenous lead extraction (TLE) have been investigated in several studies; however, little is known about the venous anatomical characteristics that can have an impact on procedural outcomes. Among them, the persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) is a common anomaly often discovered incidentally during cardiac device implantation and could raise concerns if TLE is indicated. We report technical considerations and outcomes of TLE for two patients with leads implanted via PLSVC.

Methods and results: Two cardiac implantable electronic device recipients with isolated PLSVC required TLE due to infective endocarditis in one case and lead failure in the other. In the first case, TLE procedure was performed in a hybrid operating room with minimally invasive video-assisted thoracoscopic monitoring due to the high procedural risk. Two active fixation 20-year-old pacing leads were removed with a relatively short fluoroscopy time. In the second case, we successfully extracted a single-coil active fixation lead without the need of a locking stylet or advanced extraction tools. There were no procedural complications or adverse events at 1-year follow-up.

Conclusion: TLE procedures for two patients with isolated PLSVC were successfully completed with less difficulty and tools than expected based on the characteristics of the targeted leads. If indicated, TLE in the presence of a PLSVC should be considered in experienced centers.

Keywords: ICD lead extraction; coronary sinus lead extraction; hybrid lead extraction; persistent left superior vena cava; transvenous lead extraction.

MeSH terms

  • Device Removal
  • Fluoroscopy
  • Humans
  • Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava*
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Vena Cava, Superior* / diagnostic imaging
  • Vena Cava, Superior* / surgery