College Campuses and COVID-19 Mitigation: Clinical and Economic Value

Ann Intern Med. 2021 Apr;174(4):472-483. doi: 10.7326/M20-6558. Epub 2020 Dec 21.

Abstract

Background: Colleges in the United States are determining how to operate safely amid the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

Objective: To examine the clinical outcomes, cost, and cost-effectiveness of COVID-19 mitigation strategies on college campuses.

Design: The Clinical and Economic Analysis of COVID-19 interventions (CEACOV) model, a dynamic microsimulation model, was used to examine alternative mitigation strategies. The CEACOV model tracks infections accrued by students and faculty, accounting for community transmissions.

Data sources: Data from published literature were used to obtain parameters related to COVID-19 and contact-hours.

Target population: Undergraduate students and faculty at U.S. colleges.

Time horizon: One semester (105 days).

Perspective: Modified societal.

Intervention: COVID-19 mitigation strategies, including social distancing, masks, and routine laboratory screening.

Outcome measures: Infections among students and faculty per 5000 students and per 1000 faculty, isolation days, tests, costs, cost per infection prevented, and cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY).

Results of base-case analysis: Among students, mitigation strategies reduced COVID-19 cases from 3746 with no mitigation to 493 with extensive social distancing and masks, and further to 151 when laboratory testing was added among asymptomatic persons every 3 days. Among faculty, these values were 164, 28, and 25 cases, respectively. Costs ranged from about $0.4 million for minimal social distancing to about $0.9 million to $2.1 million for strategies involving laboratory testing ($10 per test), depending on testing frequency. Extensive social distancing with masks cost $170 per infection prevented ($49 200 per QALY) compared with masks alone. Adding routine laboratory testing increased cost per infection prevented to between $2010 and $17 210 (cost per QALY gained, $811 400 to $2 804 600).

Results of sensitivity analysis: Results were most sensitive to test costs.

Limitation: Data are from multiple sources.

Conclusion: Extensive social distancing with a mandatory mask-wearing policy can prevent most COVID-19 cases on college campuses and is very cost-effective. Routine laboratory testing would prevent 96% of infections and require low-cost tests to be economically attractive.

Primary funding source: National Institutes of Health.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • COVID-19 / epidemiology
  • COVID-19 / prevention & control*
  • COVID-19 Testing
  • Communicable Disease Control / economics
  • Communicable Disease Control / methods*
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Masks
  • Mass Screening / economics
  • Pandemics
  • Physical Distancing
  • Pneumonia, Viral / epidemiology
  • Pneumonia, Viral / prevention & control*
  • SARS-CoV-2
  • United States / epidemiology
  • Universities*