Thoracic: Lung Cancer
Comparison of cancer control between segmentectomy and wedge resection in patients with clinical stage IA non–small cell lung cancer

Accepted for the 100th Annual Meeting of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.10.024Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

Abstract

Objective

The study objective was to compare cancer control between segmentectomy and wedge resection in patients with clinical stage IA non–small cell lung cancer.

Methods

Between 2010 and 2015, 457 patients with clinical stage IA (8th edition) non–small cell lung cancer undergoing wedge resection or segmentectomy were identified at 3 institutions. Propensity scores were calculated on the basis of the extent of resection (wedge resection or segmentectomy) and included adjustment for confounding variables, such as age, sex, smoking status, pulmonary functions, laterality, tumor size, maximum standardized uptake value on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, presence of ground-glass opacity on high-resolution computed tomography, histology, and visceral pleural invasion for multivariable analysis and matching. The primary end point was cumulative incidence of recurrence.

Results

In all cohorts, postoperative recurrence occurred in 36 of 195 patients (18.5%) undergoing wedge resection and 14 of 262 patients (5.3%) undergoing segmentectomy. Cumulative incidence of recurrence was significantly lower in patients undergoing segmentectomy (5-year cumulative incidence of recurrence, 5.3%) than in those undergoing wedge resection (5-year cumulative incidence of recurrence, 19.1%; P < .001). In propensity score–adjusted multivariable analysis, segmentectomy was identified as an independent favorable prognostic factor for cumulative incidence of recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.90; P = .022). In propensity score matching of 163 pairs, cumulative incidence of recurrence was significantly lower in patients undergoing segmentectomy (5-year cumulative incidence of recurrence, 6.6%) than in those undergoing wedge resection (5-year cumulative incidence of recurrence, 13.2%; P = .041).

Conclusions

Cancer control was better in segmentectomy than in wedge resection. Segmentectomy is the preferred oncologic procedure as sublobar resection to treat clinical stage IA non–small cell lung cancer.

Graphical abstract

Prospectively collected data from 457 patients with clinical stage IA (8th edition) NSCLC undergoing wedge resection or segmentectomy were retrospectively analyzed. In 163 propensity score–matched pairs, CIR was significantly lower in patients undergoing segmentectomy than in those undergoing wedge resection (hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.23-0.99; P = .041). NSCLC, Non–small cell lung cancer; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.

  1. Download : Download high-res image (236KB)
  2. Download : Download full-size image

Key Words

non–small cell lung cancer
recurrence
segmentectomy
sublobar resection
wedge resection

Abbreviations and Acronyms

CIDWR
cumulative incidence of death without recurrence
CIR
cumulative incidence of recurrence
CT
computed tomography
FDG
18F-fluorodeoxyglucose
GGO
ground-glass opacity
HRCT
high-resolution computed tomography
NSCLC
non–small cell lung cancer
PET
positron emission tomography
SUV
standardized uptake value
SUVmax
maximum standardized uptake value

Cited by (0)

Date and number of Institutional Review Board approval: Kanagawa Cancer Center: February 28, 2013; 24-KEN-54. Tokyo Medical University Hospital: February 25, 2015; SH2969. Hiroshima University Hospital: June 13, 2018; E-1216.