Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Outcome of patients treated with extracorporeal life support in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: 1-year result from the ECLS-Shock study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clinical Research in Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Treatment with extracorporeal life support (ECLS) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) fell short of improving myocardial recovery measured by 30 day ejection fraction in the ECLS-SHOCK trial. However, to date, no data regarding impact of ECLS on long-term outcomes exist.

Methods

In this randomized, controlled, prospective, open-label trial, 42 patients with CS complicating AMI were randomly assigned to ECLS (ECLS group, n = 21) or no ECLS (control group, n = 21). The primary endpoint was left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after 30 days. Secondary endpoints included mortality and neurological outcome after 12 months. Evaluation of neurological outcome used the modified Rankin Scale.

Results

The 12-month all-cause mortality was 19% in the ECLS group versus 38% in the control group (p = 0.31). Only one patient (control group) died after the initial 30 days. Three patients underwent elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during follow-up (one in the control and two in the ECLS group). Favorable neurological outcome (modified Rankin Score ≤ 2) was seen in 61.9% of patients in the ECLS group versus 57.1% in the control group (p = 1).

Conclusion

This pilot study showed that randomized studies with ECLS in CS patients are feasible and safe. Small numbers of included patients impede meaningful conclusions about mortality and neurological outcome. Our findings of numerical differences in mortality and survival with severe neurological impairment give an urgent call for larger multi-centric randomized trials assessing the endpoint of all-cause mortality but also considering the effects on neurological outcome measures.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The R Code of our analysis was submitted to the journal and is available on request.

Abbreviations

AMI:

Acute myocardial infarction

CABG:

Coronary artery bypass graft

CAD:

Coronary artery disease

CS:

Cardiogenic shock

ECLS:

Extracorporeal life support

IABP:

Intra-aortic balloon pumping

IQR:

Interquartile range

LVEF:

Left ventricular ejection fraction

MACE:

Major adverse cardiac event

PCI:

Percutaneous coronary intervention

PCAS:

Post-cardiac arrest syndrome

PRMD:

Post resuscitation myocardial dysfunction

References

  1. van Diepen S, Katz JN, Albert NM, Henry TD, Jacobs AK, Kapur NK, Kilic A, Menon V, Ohman EM, Sweitzer NK, Thiele H, Washam JB, Cohen MG, American Heart Association Council on Clinical C, Council on C, Stroke N, Council on Quality of C, Outcomes R, Mission L (2017) Contemporary management of cardiogenic shock: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 136:e232–e268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, Bueno H, Cleland JGF, Coats AJS, Falk V, Gonzalez-Juanatey JR, Harjola VP, Jankowska EA, Jessup M, Linde C, Nihoyannopoulos P, Parissis JT, Pieske B, Riley JP, Rosano GMC, Ruilope LM, Ruschitzka F, Rutten FH, van der Meer P, Group ESCSD (2016) 2016 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: the Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J 37:2129–2200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Thiele H, Jobs A, Ouweneel DM, Henriques JPS, Seyfarth M, Desch S, Eitel I, Poss J, Fuernau G, de Waha S (2017) Percutaneous short-term active mechanical support devices in cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials. Eur Heart J 38:3523–3531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann FJ, Ferenc M, Olbrich HG, Hausleiter J, Richardt G, Hennersdorf M, Empen K, Fuernau G, Desch S, Eitel I, Hambrecht R, Fuhrmann J, Bohm M, Ebelt H, Schneider S, Schuler G, Werdan K, Investigators I-SIT (2012) Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 367:1287–1296

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Aubin H, Petrov G, Dalyanoglu H, Saeed D, Akhyari P, Paprotny G, Richter M, Westenfeld R, Schelzig H, Kelm M, Kindgen-Milles D, Lichtenberg A, Albert A (2016) A Suprainstitutional network for remote extracorporeal life support: a retrospective cohort study. JACC Heart Fail 4:698–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Guenther SP, Brunner S, Born F, Fischer M, Schramm R, Pichlmaier M, Massberg S, Hagl C, Khaladj N (2016) When all else fails: extracorporeal life support in therapy-refractory cardiogenic shock. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 49:802–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Schmidt M, Burrell A, Roberts L, Bailey M, Sheldrake J, Rycus PT, Hodgson C, Scheinkestel C, Cooper DJ, Thiagarajan RR, Brodie D, Pellegrino V, Pilcher D (2015) Predicting survival after ECMO for refractory cardiogenic shock: the survival after veno-arterial-ECMO (SAVE)-score. Eur Heart J 36:2246–2256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Thiagarajan RR, Barbaro RP, Rycus PT, McMullan DM, Conrad SA, Fortenberry JD, Paden ML, centers Em (2017) Extracorporeal life support organization registry international report 2016. ASAIO J 63:60–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sattler S, Khaladj N, Zaruba MM, Fischer M, Hausleiter J, Mehilli J, Kaab S, Hagl C, Massberg S, Theiss HD (2014) Extracorporal life support (ECLS) in acute ischaemic cardiogenic shock. Int J Clin Pract 68:529–531

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kapur NK, Paruchuri V, Urbano-Morales JA, Mackey EE, Daly GH, Qiao X, Pandian N, Perides G, Karas RH (2013) Mechanically unloading the left ventricle before coronary reperfusion reduces left ventricular wall stress and myocardial infarct size. Circulation 128:328–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ostadal P, Mlcek M, Gorhan H, Simundic I, Strunina S, Hrachovina M, Kruger A, Vondrakova D, Janotka M, Hala P, Mates M, Ostadal M, Leiter JC, Kittnar O, Neuzil P (2018) Electrocardiogram-synchronized pulsatile extracorporeal life support preserves left ventricular function and coronary flow in a porcine model of cardiogenic shock. PLoS One 13:e0196321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brunner S, Guenther SPW, Lackermair K, Peterss S, Orban M, Boulesteix AL, Michel S, Hausleiter J, Massberg S, Hagl C (2019) Extracorporeal life support in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 73:2355–2357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Thiele H, Akin I, Sandri M, Fuernau G, de Waha S, Meyer-Saraei R, Nordbeck P, Geisler T, Landmesser U, Skurk C, Fach A, Lapp H, Piek JJ, Noc M, Goslar T, Felix SB, Maier LS, Stepinska J, Oldroyd K, Serpytis P, Montalescot G, Barthelemy O, Huber K, Windecker S, Savonitto S, Torremante P, Vrints C, Schneider S, Desch S, Zeymer U, Investigators C-S (2017) PCI strategies in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 377:2419–2432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, Antunes MJ, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Bueno H, Caforio ALP, Crea F, Goudevenos JA, Halvorsen S, Hindricks G, Kastrati A, Lenzen MJ, Prescott E, Roffi M, Valgimigli M, Varenhorst C, Vranckx P, Widimsky P, Group ESCSD (2018) 2017 ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: the Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 39:119–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet JP, Mueller C, Valgimigli M, Andreotti F, Bax JJ, Borger MA, Brotons C, Chew DP, Gencer B, Hasenfuss G, Kjeldsen K, Lancellotti P, Landmesser U, Mehilli J, Mukherjee D, Storey RF, Windecker S, Group ESCSD (2016) 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 37:267–315

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Werdan K, Russ M, Buerke M, Delle-Karth G, Geppert A, Schondube FA, German Cardiac S, German Society of Intensive C, Emergency M, German Society for T, Cardiovascular S, German Interdisciplinary Association of Intensive C, Emergency M, Austrian Society of C, German Society of A, Intensive Care M, German Society of Preventive M, Rehabilitation (2012) Cardiogenic shock due to myocardial infarction: diagnosis, monitoring and treatment: a German–Austrian S3 guideline. Dtsch Arztebl Int 109:343–351

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Guenther SPW, Buchholz S, Born F, Brunner S, Schramm R, Hoechter DJ, von Dossow V, Pichlmaier M, Hagl C, Khaladj N (2017) Remote ECLS-implantation and transport for retrieval of cardiogenic shock patients. Air Med J 36:320–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Seyfarth M, Sibbing D, Bauer I, Frohlich G, Bott-Flugel L, Byrne R, Dirschinger J, Kastrati A, Schomig A (2008) A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device versus intra-aortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock caused by myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:1584–1588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cha KC, Kim HI, Kim OH, Cha YS, Kim H, Lee KH, Hwang SO (2018) Echocardiographic patterns of postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction. Resuscitation 124:90–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kern KB, Hilwig RW, Rhee KH, Berg RA (1996) Myocardial dysfunction after resuscitation from cardiac arrest: an example of global myocardial stunning. J Am Coll Cardiol 28:232–240

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lorusso R, Barili F, Mauro MD, Gelsomino S, Parise O, Rycus PT, Maessen J, Mueller T, Muellenbach R, Belohlavek J, Peek G, Combes A, Frenckner B, Pesenti A, Thiagarajan RR (2016) In-hospital neurologic complications in adult patients undergoing Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: results from the extracorporeal life support organization registry. Crit Care Med 44:e964–e972

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lorusso R (2017) Extracorporeal life support and neurologic complications: still a long way to go. J Thorac Dis 9:E954–E956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wong JK, Smith TN, Pitcher HT, Hirose H, Cavarocchi NC (2012) Cerebral and lower limb near-infrared spectroscopy in adults on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Artif Organs 36:659–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Busl KM, Greer DM (2010) Hypoxic-ischemic brain injury: pathophysiology, neuropathology and mechanisms. NeuroRehabilitation 26:5–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Perkins GD, Ji C, Deakin CD, Quinn T, Nolan JP, Scomparin C, Regan S, Long J, Slowther A, Pocock H, Black JJM, Moore F, Fothergill RT, Rees N, O’Shea L, Docherty M, Gunson I, Han K, Charlton K, Finn J, Petrou S, Stallard N, Gates S, Lall R, Collaborators P (2018) A randomized trial of epinephrine in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 379:711–721

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Nolan JP, Soar J, Cariou A, Cronberg T, Moulaert VR, Deakin CD, Bottiger BW, Friberg H, Sunde K, Sandroni C (2015) European Resuscitation Council and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Guidelines for Post-resuscitation Care 2015: Section 5 of the European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015. Resuscitation 95:202–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

LivaNova (Munich, Germany) supported the study, but did not have any involvement in trial design or evaluation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KL (conception and design or analysis and interpretation of data, drafting of the manuscript or revising it critically for important intellectual content), SB (conception and design or analysis and interpretation of data, drafting of the manuscript or revising it critically for important intellectual content), MO (final approval of the manuscript submitted), SP (final approval of the manuscript submitted), MO (final approval of the manuscript submitted), HDT (conception and design or analysis and interpretation of data), BCH (final approval of the manuscript submitted), GJ (final approval of the manuscript submitted), FB (conception and design or analysis and interpretation of data), A-LB (conception and design or analysis and interpretation of data), AB (conception and design or analysis and interpretation of data), MP (conception and design or analysis and interpretation of data), JH (conception and design or analysis and interpretation of data, drafting of the manuscript or revising it critically for important intellectual content), SM (conception and design or analysis and interpretation of data, drafting of the manuscript or revising it critically for important intellectual content), CH (conception and design or analysis and interpretation of data), SPWG (conception and design or analysis and interpretation of data, final approval of the manuscript submitted).

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Steffen Massberg or Christian Hagl.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lackermair, K., Brunner, S., Orban, M. et al. Outcome of patients treated with extracorporeal life support in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: 1-year result from the ECLS-Shock study. Clin Res Cardiol 110, 1412–1420 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-020-01778-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-020-01778-8

Keywords

Navigation