Efficacy of MAVIG X-Ray Protective Drapes in Reducing Operator Radiation Dose in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Nov;13(11):e009627. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009627. Epub 2020 Oct 23.

Abstract

Background: Interventional cardiologists are occupationally exposed to high doses of ionizing radiation. The MAVIG X-ray protective drape (MXPD) is a commercially available light weight, lead-free shield placed over the pelvic area of patients to minimize operator radiation dose. The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of the MXPD during routine cardiac catheterization, including percutaneous coronary interventions.

Methods: We performed a prospective, randomized controlled study comparing operator radiation dose during cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention (n=632) with or without pelvic MXPD. We measured operator radiation dose at 4 sites: left eye, chest, left ring finger, and right ring finger. The primary outcomes were the difference in first operator radiation dose (µSv) and relative dose of the first operator (radiation dose normalized for dose area product) at the level of the chest in the 2 groups.

Results: The use of the MXPD was associated with a 50% reduction in operator radiation dose (median dose 30.5 [interquartile range, 23.0-39.7] µSv in no drape group versus 15.3 [interquartile range, 11.1-20.0] µSv in the drape group; P<0.001) and a 57% reduction in relative operator dose (P<0.001). The largest absolute reduction in dose was observed at the left finger (median left finger dose for the no drape group was 104.9 [75.7-137.4] µSv versus 41.9 [32.6-70.6] µSv in the drape group; P<0.001).

Conclusions: The pelvic MXPD significantly reduces first operator radiation dose during routine cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT04285944.

Keywords: cardiac catheterization; cardiologists; percutaneous coronary intervention; radiation; risk.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Belgium
  • Cardiac Catheterization* / adverse effects
  • Cardiologists*
  • Equipment Design
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Occupational Exposure / adverse effects
  • Occupational Exposure / prevention & control*
  • Occupational Health
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention* / adverse effects
  • Prospective Studies
  • Radiation Dosage*
  • Radiation Dosimeters
  • Radiation Exposure / adverse effects
  • Radiation Exposure / prevention & control*
  • Radiation Monitoring / instrumentation
  • Radiation Protection / instrumentation*
  • Radiography, Interventional* / adverse effects
  • Radiologists*
  • Risk Assessment
  • Risk Factors
  • Single-Blind Method
  • Surgical Drapes*

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT04285944