Association between coronary artery bypass graft center volume and year-to-year outcome variability: New York and California statewide analysis

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Mar;161(3):1035-1041.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.07.119. Epub 2020 Sep 22.

Abstract

Objective: We evaluated whether volume-based, rather than time-based, annual reporting of center outcomes for coronary artery bypass grafting may improve inference of quality, assuming that large center-level year-to-year outcome variability is related to statistical noise.

Methods: We analyzed 2012 to 2016 data on isolated coronary artery bypass grafting using statewide outcome reports from New York and California. Annual changes in center-level observed-to-expected mortality ratio represented stability of year-to-year outcomes. Cubic spline fit related the annual observed-to-expected ratio change and center volume. Volume above the inflection point of the spline curve indicated centers with low year-to-year change in outcome. We compared observed-to-expected ratio changes between centers below and above the volume threshold and observed-to-expected ratio changes between consecutive annual and biennial measurements.

Results: There were 155 centers with median annual volume of 89 (interquartile range, 55-160) for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. The inflection point of observed-to-expected ratio variability was observed at 111 cases/year. Median year-to-year observed-to-expected ratio change for centers performing less than 111 cases (62 centers) was greater at 0.83 (0.26-1.59) compared with centers performing 111 cases or more (93 centers) at 0.49 (022-0.87) (P < .001). By aggregating the outcome over 2 years, centers above the 111-case threshold increased from 93 centers (60%) to 118 centers (76%), but the median observed-to-expected change for all centers was similar between annual aggregates at 0.70 (0.26-1.22) compared with observed-to-expected change between biennial aggregates at 0.54 (0.23-1.02) (P = .095).

Conclusions: Center-level, risk-adjusted coronary artery bypass grafting mortality varies significantly from one year to the next. Reporting outcomes by specific case volume may complement annual reports.

Keywords: CABG; center volume; outcome reporting; volume-outcome relationship.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Webcast

MeSH terms

  • California
  • Coronary Artery Bypass / adverse effects
  • Coronary Artery Bypass / mortality
  • Coronary Artery Bypass / trends*
  • Coronary Artery Disease / mortality
  • Coronary Artery Disease / surgery*
  • Databases, Factual
  • Hospitals, High-Volume / trends*
  • Hospitals, Low-Volume / trends*
  • Humans
  • New York
  • Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care / trends*
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians' / trends*
  • Quality Indicators, Health Care / trends
  • Risk Assessment
  • Risk Factors
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome