Background: Obese patients constitute a substantial proportion of patients referred for SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), presenting a challenge of increased soft tissue attenuation. We investigated whether automated quantitative perfusion analysis can stratify risk among different obesity categories and whether two-view acquisition adds to prognostic assessment.
Methods: Participants were categorized according to body mass index (BMI). SPECT MPI was assessed visually and quantified automatically; combined total perfusion deficit (TPD) was evaluated. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard analyses were used to assess major adverse cardiac event (MACE) risk. Prognostic accuracy for MACE was also compared.
Results: Patients were classified according to BMI: BMI < 30, 30 ≤ BMI < 35, BMI ≥ 35. In adjusted analysis, each category of increasing stress TPD was associated with increased MACE risk, except for 1% ≤ TPD < 5% and 5% ≤ TPD < 10% in patients with BMI ≥ 35. Compared to visual analysis, single-position stress TPD had higher prognostic accuracy in patients with BMI < 30 (AUC .652 vs .631, P < .001) and 30 ≤ BMI < 35 (AUC .660 vs .636, P = .027). Combined TPD had better discrimination than visual analysis in patients with BMI ≥ 35 (AUC .662 vs .615, P = .003).
Conclusions: Automated quantitative methods for SPECT MPI interpretation provide robust risk stratification in the obese population. Combined stress TPD provides additional prognostic accuracy in patients with more significant obesity.
Keywords: Body mass index; SPECT; automated quantification; myocardial perfusion imaging; obesity; risk stratification.
© 2020. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.