Impact of diabetes mellitus on female subjects undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Insights from the WIN-TAVI international registry

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.08.035Get rights and content

Highlights

  • One fourth of female subjects undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation have diabetes mellitus at baseline.

  • DM female patients undergoing TAVI have higher comorbidities and lower transvalvular gradients.

  • DM in female subjects is associated with lower risk of VARC-2 life threatening bleeding up to 1 year after TAVI.

Abstract

Background

Female subjects constitute half of all transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) candidates, but the association between important comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus (DM) and clinical outcomes after TAVI remains unclear in this group.

Method

WIN-TAVI is a real-world international registry of exclusively female subjects undergoing TAVI. The study population was stratified into those with (DM) and those without DM (NDM). Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-2 efficacy (composite of all-cause death, stroke, myocardial infarction, hospitalization for valve-related symptoms or worsening congestive heart failure, or valve-related dysfunction) was the primary endpoint for this analysis.

Results

Of the 1012 subjects included in this study, 264 (26.1%) had DM at baseline. DM patients were younger but had a higher burden of comorbidities. There were no differences in VARC-2 efficacy events between DM and NDM patients at 30 days or 1 year. Conversely, patients with DM had a lower risk of VARC-2 life threatening bleeding at 30 days and 1 year after TAVI compared to NDM patients, which remained significant even after multivariable adjustment (HR, 0.34, 95% CI, 0.12–0.99; p = .047). In the subgroup analysis, insulin-dependent DM was not associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes.

Conclusions

Among female patients undergoing TAVI, more than one-fourth of the subjects presented with DM. At 1-year follow-up, DM was associated with lower bleeding complications and no increase in the risk of other adverse events, including mortality, after TAVI.

Introduction

Degenerative aortic stenosis (AS) is the most frequently encountered valvular heart disorder requiring treatment in developed countries. If severe symptomatic AS is left untreated, it culminates in significantly impaired survival [1]. Although originally ascribed to tissue degeneration and wear-and-tear from older age, pathophysiology of AS has now been ascertained to occur along a continuum of inflammation and calcification [2]. Therefore, metabolic derangements in diabetes mellitus (DM) and female sex, both of which have been associated with higher levels of circulating inflammatory biomarkers, have also been associated with more severe AS and worse outcomes [3,4].

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as a viable treatment option, especially in elderly patients across the entire surgical risk spectrum [[5], [6], [7]]. Several studies have been conducted in patients ranging from inoperable to high, intermediate, and low surgical risk to establish the efficacy and safety of TAVI compared to SAVR. Approximately 200,000 patients are eligible for TAVI annually between North America and Europe, and these numbers are only expected to rise as the indications for TAVI are broadened [7,8]. Although about half of all subjects undergoing TAVI are female, the association between important comorbidities like DM and clinical outcomes after TAVI in this subgroup remain uncertain [9,10].

The Women's International Transcatheter Aortic Valve implantation (WIN-TAVI) registry is the only international study that exclusively enrolled female subjects with severe AS undergoing TAVI [11]. In this subanalysis, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence of DM among female TAVI patients and its influence on clinical outcomes up to 1-year follow-up.

Section snippets

Methods

The Women's International Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (WIN-TAVI) is a prospective, real world, international, multicentre registry of exclusively female subjects undergoing TAVI. The details of the study design, and protocol have been described previously [11]. In brief, the investigators prospectively enrolled 1019 female patients from 19 tertiary care, high-volume centres across Europe and Unites States between January 2013 and December 2015, with minimal exclusion criteria. All

Results

Complete information on baseline DM status was available for 1012 subjects in our study. Baseline clinical characteristics and female-specific variables of the two groups are described in Supplementary Table 1. Of the total population, 26% (264) had DM at the time of index procedure, with a majority of subjects on either oral therapy (51.8%) or insulin (36.3%). Patients with DM were younger, had more comorbidities, higher STS score, and were more likely to have prior cardiac and cerebrovascular

Discussion

The main findings from our study of female subjects with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI at high-volume tertiary care centres are: 1) more than one fourth of all female subjects presented with DM at baseline, half of whom received pharmacological treatment with oral hypoglycaemic drugs and another one third with insulin therapy; 2) DM was associated with lower risk of VARC-2 life threatening bleeding up to 1 year after TAVI; and 3) DM was not associated with ischemic adverse outcomes or

Conclusions

In conclusion, in our study of female subjects undergoing TAVI, we found that one fourth of them presented with DM at baseline. Presence of DM was associated with lower risk of life-threatening bleeding, while it did not impact ischemic outcomes or severe residual symptoms up to 1 year after TAVI.

Funding

This work did not receive any funding.

Disclosures

UB received institutional research grant from AstraZeneca; personal fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, and Boston Scientific.

ASP reports consultancy fees for Medtronic, Abbott, Boston and funds by Boston and Abbott.

JM received institutional grants from Boston Scientific and lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boston Scientific and Edwards Lifescience.

TL proctors for Edwards, Boston and Abbott.

NMVM received research grant support and advisory fees from Abbott, Boston Scientific, and

Acknowledgements

None.

References (29)

All author take responsibility for all aspects of the reliability and freedom from bias of the data presented and their discussed interpretation

View full text