Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multi-proteomic approach to predict specific cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes and myocardial infarction: findings from the EXAMINE trial

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clinical Research in Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Patients with diabetes who had a recent myocardial infarction (MI) are at high risk of cardiovascular events. Therefore, risk assessment is important for treatment and shared decisions. We used data from EXAMINE trial to investigate whether a multi-proteomic approach would provide specific proteomic signatures and also improve the prognostic capacity for determining the risk of cardiovascular death, MI, stroke, heart failure [HF], all-cause death, and combinations of these outcomes.

Methods

93 circulating proteins (92 from the Olink® CVDII plus troponin) were assessed in 5131 patients. Cox, competing risks, and reclassification measures were applied.

Results

The clinical model showed good discrimination and calibration for all outcomes. On top of the clinical model that included age, sex, smoking, diabetes duration, history of MI (prior to the index MI of inclusion), history of HF hospitalization, history of stroke, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, systolic blood pressure, statin therapy, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and study treatment (alogliptin or placebo), troponin and BNP added prognostic information to the composite of cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke (∆C-index + 5%) and cardiovascular death alone (∆C-index + 7%). Troponin, BNP, and TRAILR2 added prognostic information on all-cause death and the composite of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization. HF hospitalization alone was improved by adding BNP and Gal-9. For MI, troponin, FGF23, and AMBP added prognostic value; whereas for stroke, only troponin added prognostic value (multi-proteomics improved C-index > 3% [p < 0.001] for all the studied outcomes). The addition of the final biomarker selection to the clinical model improved event reclassification (cNRI from + 23% to + 64%). Specifically, the addition of the biomarkers allowed a better classification of patients at low risk (as having “true” low risk) and patients and high risk (as having “true” high risk). These results were consistent for all the studied outcomes with even more marked differences in the fatal events.

Conclusions

The addition of multi-proteomic biomarkers to a clinical model in this population with diabetes and a recent MI allowed a better risk prediction and event reclassification, potentially helping for better risk assessment and targeted treatment decisions.

Graphic abstract

T2D type 2 diabetes, MI myocardial infarction, CV cardiovascular, HFH heart failure hospitalization, Δ delta, cNRI continuous net reclassification index, BNP brain natriuretic peptide, TRAILR2 trail receptor 2 (or death receptor 5), Gal-9 galectin-9, FGF23 fibroblast growth factor 23.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

The data and materials may be available upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Ogurtsova K, da Rocha Fernandes JD, Huang Y, Linnenkamp U, Guariguata L, Cho NH, Cavan D, Shaw JE, Makaroff LE (2017) IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates for the prevalence of diabetes for 2015 and 2040. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 128:40–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Haffner SM, Lehto S, Ronnemaa T, Pyorala K, Laakso M (1998) Mortality from coronary heart disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic subjects with and without prior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 339(4):229–234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gaede P, Lund-Andersen H, Parving HH, Pedersen O (2008) Effect of a multifactorial intervention on mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 358(6):580–591

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ettehad D, Emdin CA, Kiran A, Anderson SG, Callender T, Emberson J, Chalmers J, Rodgers A, Rahimi K (2016) Blood pressure lowering for prevention of cardiovascular disease and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 387(10022):957–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fitchett D, Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, Hantel S, Salsali A, Johansen OE, Woerle HJ, Broedl UC, Inzucchi SE (2016) Heart failure outcomes with empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk: results of the EMPA-REG OUTCOME(R) trial. Eur Heart J 37(19):1526–1534

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sharma A, Cooper LB, Fiuzat M, Mentz RJ, Ferreira JP, Butler J, Fitchett D, Moses AC, O'Connor C, Zannad F (2018) Antihyperglycemic Therapies to Treat Patients With Heart Failure and Diabetes Mellitus. JACC Heart Fail 6(10):813–822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Smolina K, Wright FL, Rayner M, Goldacre MJ (2012) Determinants of the decline in mortality from acute myocardial infarction in England between 2002 and 2010: linked national database study. BMJ 344:d8059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sabatine MS, Giugliano RP, Keech AC, Honarpour N, Wiviott SD, Murphy SA, Kuder JF, Wang H, Liu T, Wasserman SM, Sever PS, Pedersen TR (2017) Evolocumab and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease. N Engl J Med 376(18):1713–1722

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferreira JP, Girerd N, Alshalash S, Konstam MA, Zannad F (2016) Antithrombotic therapy in heart failure patients with and without atrial fibrillation: update and future challenges. Eur Heart J. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cameron C, Coyle D, Richter T, Kelly S, Gauthier K, Steiner S, Carrier M, Coyle K, Bai A, Moulton K, Clifford T, Wells G (2014) Systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing antithrombotic agents for the prevention of stroke and major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation. BMJ Open 4(6):e004301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pocock SJ, Ariti CA, McMurray JJ, Maggioni A, Kober L, Squire IB, Swedberg K, Dobson J, Poppe KK, Whalley GA, Doughty RN (2013) Predicting survival in heart failure: a risk score based on 39 372 patients from 30 studies. Eur Heart J 34(19):1404–1413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Voors AA, Ouwerkerk W, Zannad F, van Veldhuisen DJ, Samani NJ, Ponikowski P, Ng LL, Metra M, Ter Maaten JM, Lang CC, Hillege HL, van der Harst P, Filippatos G, Dickstein K, Cleland JG, Anker SD, Zwinderman AH (2017) Development and validation of multivariable models to predict mortality and hospitalization in patients with heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.785

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wolsk E, Claggett B, Pfeffer MA, Diaz R, Dickstein K, Gerstein HC, Lawson FC, Lewis EF, Maggioni AP, McMurray JJV, Probstfield JL, Riddle MC, Solomon SD, Tardif JC, Kober L (2017) Role of B-Type Natriuretic Peptide and N-Terminal Prohormone BNP as Predictors of Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality in Patients With a Recent Coronary Event and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. J Am Heart Assoc. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.004743

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Everett BM, Brooks MM, Vlachos HE, Chaitman BR, Frye RL, Bhatt DL (2015) Troponin and Cardiac Events in Stable Ischemic Heart Disease and Diabetes. N Engl J Med 373(7):610–620

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. White WB, Cannon CP, Heller SR, Nissen SE, Bergenstal RM, Bakris GL, Perez AT, Fleck PR, Mehta CR, Kupfer S, Wilson C, Cushman WC, Zannad F (2013) Alogliptin after acute coronary syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 369(14):1327–1335

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zannad F, Cannon CP, Cushman WC, Bakris GL, Menon V, Perez AT, Fleck PR, Mehta CR, Kupfer S, Wilson C, Lam H, White WB (2015) Heart failure and mortality outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes taking alogliptin versus placebo in EXAMINE: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind trial. Lancet 385(9982):2067–2076

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. White WB, Bakris GL, Bergenstal RM, Cannon CP, Cushman WC, Fleck P, Heller S, Mehta C, Nissen SE, Perez A, Wilson C, Zannad F (2011) EXamination of cArdiovascular outcoMes with alogliptIN versus standard of carE in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and acute coronary syndrome (EXAMINE): a cardiovascular safety study of the dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor alogliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes with acute coronary syndrome. Am Heart J 162(4):620–626.e1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hwang YC, Morrow DA, Cannon CP, Liu Y, Bergenstal R, Heller S, Mehta C, Cushman W, Bakris GL, Zannad F, White WB (2018) High-sensitivity C-reactive protein, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes in the EXAMINE (Examination of Cardiovascular Outcomes with Alogliptin versus Standard of Care) trial. Diabetes Obes Metab 20(3):654–659

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. White WB, Jalil F, Cushman WC, Bakris GL, Bergenstal R, Heller SR, Liu Y, Mehta C, Zannad F, Cannon CP (2018) Average Clinician-Measured Blood Pressures and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Ischemic Heart Disease in the EXAMINE Trial. J Am Heart Assoc 7(20):e009114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cavender MA, White WB, Jarolim P, Bakris GL, Cushman WC, Kupfer S, Gao Q, Mehta CR, Zannad F, Cannon CP, Morrow DA (2017) Serial Measurement of High-Sensitivity Troponin I and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in the EXAMINE Trial (Examination of Cardiovascular Outcomes With Alogliptin Versus Standard of Care). Circulation 135(20):1911–1921

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ferreira JP, Girerd N, Pellicori P, Duarte K, Girerd S, Pfeffer MA, McMurray JJ, Pitt B, Dickstein K, Jacobs L, Staessen JA, Butler J, Latini R, Masson S, Mebazaa A, Rocca HP, Delles C, Heymans S, Sattar N, Jukema JW, Cleland JG, Zannad F, Rossignol P (2016) Renal function estimation and Cockroft-Gault formulas for predicting cardiovascular mortality in population-based, cardiovascular risk, heart failure and post-myocardial infarction cohorts: The Heart 'OMics' in AGEing (HOMAGE) and the high-risk myocardial infarction database initiatives. BMC Med 14(1):181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Green GH, Diggle PJ (2007) On the operational characteristics of the Benjamini and Hochberg False Discovery Rate procedure. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Harrell F (2001) Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhu H, Ibrahim JG, Chen Q (2014) Bayesian Case-deletion Model Complexity and Information Criterion. Stat Interface 7(4):531–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Leening MJ, Vedder MM, Witteman JC, Pencina MJ, Steyerberg EW (2014) Net reclassification improvement: computation, interpretation, and controversies: a literature review and clinician's guide. Ann Intern Med 160(2):122–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jp F, Rj G (1999) A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc 94:496–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. de Lemos JA, Drazner MH, Omland T, Ayers CR, Khera A, Rohatgi A, Hashim I, Berry JD, Das SR, Morrow DA, McGuire DK (2010) Association of troponin T detected with a highly sensitive assay and cardiac structure and mortality risk in the general population. JAMA 304(22):2503–2512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sharma A, Vaduganathan M, Ferreira JP, Liu Y, Bakris GL, Cannon CP, White WB, Zannad F (2020) Clinical and Biomarker Predictors of Expanded Heart Failure Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus After a Recent Acute Coronary Syndrome: Insights From the EXAMINE Trial. J Am Heart Assoc 9(1):e012797

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Huelsmann M, Neuhold S, Resl M, Strunk G, Brath H, Francesconi C, Adlbrecht C, Prager R, Luger A, Pacher R, Clodi M (2013) PONTIAC (NT-proBNP selected prevention of cardiac events in a population of diabetic patients without a history of cardiac disease): a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 62(15):1365–1372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ramamurthy V, Yamniuk AP, Lawrence EJ, Yong W, Schneeweis LA, Cheng L, Murdock M, Corbett MJ, Doyle ML, Sheriff S (2015) The structure of the death receptor 4-TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (DR4-TRAIL) complex. Acta Crystallogr F Struct Biol Commun 71(Pt 10):1273–1281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Hymowitz SG, Christinger HW, Fuh G, Ultsch M, O'Connell M, Kelley RF, Ashkenazi A, de Vos AM (1999) Triggering cell death: the crystal structure of Apo2L/TRAIL in a complex with death receptor 5. Mol Cell 4(4):563–571

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Skau E, Henriksen E, Wagner P, Hedberg P, Siegbahn A, Leppert J (2017) GDF-15 and TRAIL-R2 are powerful predictors of long-term mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Eur J Prev Cardiol 24(15):1576–1583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ridker PM, Luscher TF (2014) Anti-inflammatory therapies for cardiovascular disease. Eur Heart J 35(27):1782–1791

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ferreira JP, Verdonschot J, Collier T, Wang P, Pizard A, Bar C, Bjorkman J, Boccanelli A, Butler J, Clark A, Cleland JG, Delles C, Diez J, Girerd N, Gonzalez A, Hazebroek M, Huby AC, Jukema W, Latini R, Leenders J, Levy D, Mebazaa A, Mischak H, Pinet F, Rossignol P, Sattar N, Sever P, Staessen JA, Thum T, Vodovar N, Zhang ZY, Heymans S, Zannad F (2019) Proteomic Bioprofiles and Mechanistic Pathways of Progression to Heart Failure. Circ Heart Fail 12(5):e005897

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. He XW, Li WL, Li C, Liu P, Shen YG, Zhu M, Jin XP (2017) Serum levels of galectin-1, galectin-3, and galectin-9 are associated with large artery atherosclerotic stroke. Sci Rep 7:40994

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Panwar B, Judd SE, Wadley VG, Jenny NS, Howard VJ, Safford MM, Gutierrez OM (2018) Association of Fibroblast Growth Factor 23 With Risk of Incident Coronary Heart Disease in Community-Living Adults. JAMA Cardiol 3(4):318–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hao H, Li X, Li Q, Lin H, Chen Z, Xie J, Xuan W, Liao W, Bin J, Huang X, Kitakaze M, Liao Y (2016) FGF23 promotes myocardial fibrosis in mice through activation of beta-catenin. Oncotarget 7(40):64649–64664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Liu H, Luo D, Qiu Y, Huang Y, Chen C, Song X, Gao L, Zhou Y (2019) The Effect of AMBP SNPs, Their Haplotypes, and Gene-Environment Interactions on the Risk of Atherothrombotic Stroke Among the Chinese Population. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 23(7):487–494

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Wan X, Zhang L, Gu H, Wang S, Liu X (2019) The Association of Serum hsCRP and Urinary Alpha1-Microglobulin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Biomed Res Int 2019:6364390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Inzucchi SE, Zinman B, Fitchett D, Wanner C, Ferrannini E, Schumacher M, Schmoor C, Ohneberg K, Johansen OE, George JT, Hantel S, Bluhmki E, Lachin JM (2018) How Does Empagliflozin Reduce Cardiovascular Mortality? Insights From a Mediation Analysis of the EMPA-REG OUTCOME Trial. Diabetes Care 41(2):356–363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Hernandez AF, Green JB, Janmohamed S, D'Agostino RB, Granger CB, Jones NP, Leiter LA, Rosenberg AE, Sigmon KN, Somerville MC, Thorpe KM, McMurray JJV, Del Prato S (2018) Albiglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease (Harmony Outcomes): a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 392(10157):1519–1529

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Cosentino F, Grant PJ, Aboyans V, Bailey CJ, Ceriello A, Delgado V, Federici M, Filippatos G, Grobbee DE, Hansen TB, Huikuri HV, Johansson I, Juni P, Lettino M, Marx N, Mellbin LG, Ostgren CJ, Rocca B, Roffi M, Sattar N, Seferovic PM, Sousa-Uva M, Valensi P, Wheeler DC (2020) 2019 ESC Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD. Eur Heart J 41(2):255–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Disease C, Management R (2020) Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2020. Diabetes Care 43(Suppl 1):S111–s134

    Google Scholar 

  44. Cooney MT, Dudina AL, Graham IM (2009) Value and limitations of existing scores for the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a review for clinicians. J Am Coll Cardiol 54(14):1209–1227

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

EXAMINE is a clinical trial sponsored by Takeda Global Research and Development Center, Inc., Deerfield, IL. The authors are solely responsible for the design of the study, all study analyses, and the drafting and editing of the manuscript and its final contents. Clinical trials identifier: Clinicaltrials.gov-NCT00968708. JPF, PR, FZ are supported by a public grant overseen by the French National Research Agency (ANR) as part of the second “Investissements d’Avenir” program (ANR-15-RHU-0004). All the other authors have nothing to disclose with regards to this manuscript. JPF wrote the manuscript, performed the statistical analysis and made critical revisions; AS contributed to discussion and reviewed/edited the manuscript; CM contributed to discussion and reviewed/edited the manuscript including the revision of the statistical methods and analysis; GB reviewed/edited the manuscript; PR reviewed/edited the manuscript; WBW reviewed/edited the manuscript; FZ contributed to discussion and reviewed/edited the manuscript. Dr. João Pedro Ferreira is the guarantor of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Funding

A.S is supported by a research grant from the Fonds de Recherche Sante – Quebec Junior Award, Alberta Innovates Health Solution Clinician Scientist fellowship, the European Society of Cardiology Young Investigator research grant, and has received research support from Roche Diagnostics, Boeringer-Ingelheim, Takeda, Akcea, and the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Bayer Vascular award. G.L.B., has received personal fees from Takeda Development Center, is a consultant for Merck, Relypsa, and is on the steering committee for international renal/CV outcomes trials for Janssen, Bayer, Vascular Dynamics. W.B.W has received research support from the National Institute of Aging (NIH) and personal fees from Takeda Development Center (Deerfield, IL, USA) during the conduct of the EXAMINE trial (Steering Committee Chair). F.Z has received fees for serving on the board of Boston Scientific; consulting fees from Novartis, Takeda, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GE Healthcare, Relypsa, Servier, Boston Scientific, Bayer, Johnson & Johnson, and Resmed; and speaking fees from Pfizer and AstraZeneca. No other potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to João Pedro Ferreira.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 813 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ferreira, J.P., Sharma, A., Mehta, C. et al. Multi-proteomic approach to predict specific cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes and myocardial infarction: findings from the EXAMINE trial. Clin Res Cardiol 110, 1006–1019 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-020-01729-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-020-01729-3

Keywords

Navigation