Short-Term Oral Anticoagulation Versus Antiplatelet Therapy Following Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Closure

Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Aug;13(8):e009039. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009039. Epub 2020 Aug 10.

Abstract

Background: The impact of antithrombotic therapy on coagulation system activation after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) remains unknown. This study sought to compare changes in coagulation markers associated with short-term oral anticoagulation (OAC) versus antiplatelet therapy (APT) following LAAC.

Methods: Prospective study including 78 atrial fibrillation patients undergoing LAAC with the Watchman device. F1+2 (prothrombin fragment 1+2) and TAT (thrombin-antithrombin III) were assessed immediately before the procedure, and at 7, 30, and 180 days after LAAC.

Results: Forty-eight patients were discharged on APT (dual: 31, single: 17) and 30 on OAC (direct anticoagulants: 26, vitamin K antagonists: 4), with no differences in baseline-procedural characteristics between groups except for higher spontaneous echocardiography contrast in the OAC group. OAC significantly reduced coagulation activation within 7 days post-LAAC compared with APT (23% [95% CI, 5%-41%] versus 82% [95% CI, 54%-111%] increase for F1+2, P=0.007; 52% [95% CI, 15%-89%] versus 183% [95% CI, 118%-248%] increase for TAT, P=0.048), with all patients in both groups progressively returning to baseline values at 30 and 180 days. Spontaneous echocardiography contrast pre-LAAC was associated with an enhanced activation of the coagulation system post-LAAC (144 [48-192] versus 52 [24-111] nmol/L, P=0.062 for F1+2; 299 [254-390] versus 78 [19-240] ng/mL, P=0.002 for TAT). Device-related thrombosis occurred in 5 patients (6.4%), and all of them were receiving APT at the time of transesophageal echocardiography (10.2% versus 0% if OAC at the time of transesophageal echocardiography, P=0.151). Patients with device thrombosis exhibited a greater coagulation activation 7 days post-LAAC (P=0.038 and P=0.108 for F1+2 and TAT, respectively).

Conclusions: OAC (versus APT) was associated with a significant attenuation of coagulation system activation post-LAAC. Spontaneous echocardiography contrast pre-LAAC associated with enhanced coagulation activation post-LAAC, which in turn increased the risk of device thrombosis. These results highlight the urgent need for randomized trials comparing OAC versus APT post-LAAC.

Keywords: antithrombin III; atrial appendage; atrial fibrillation; prothrombin; thrombin.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Observational Study

MeSH terms

  • Administration, Oral
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Anticoagulants / administration & dosage*
  • Anticoagulants / adverse effects
  • Antithrombin III
  • Atrial Appendage / diagnostic imaging
  • Atrial Appendage / physiopathology*
  • Atrial Fibrillation / complications
  • Atrial Fibrillation / diagnosis
  • Atrial Fibrillation / physiopathology
  • Atrial Fibrillation / therapy*
  • Atrial Function, Left*
  • Biomarkers / blood
  • Blood Coagulation / drug effects
  • Cardiac Catheterization* / adverse effects
  • Cardiac Catheterization* / instrumentation
  • Drug Administration Schedule
  • Female
  • Fibrinolytic Agents / administration & dosage*
  • Fibrinolytic Agents / adverse effects
  • Heart Rate
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Peptide Fragments / blood
  • Peptide Hydrolases / blood
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors / administration & dosage*
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors / adverse effects
  • Prospective Studies
  • Prothrombin
  • Risk Assessment
  • Risk Factors
  • Thrombosis / blood
  • Thrombosis / diagnostic imaging
  • Thrombosis / etiology
  • Thrombosis / prevention & control*
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Anticoagulants
  • Biomarkers
  • Fibrinolytic Agents
  • Peptide Fragments
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
  • antithrombin III-protease complex
  • prothrombin fragment 1.2
  • Antithrombin III
  • Prothrombin
  • Peptide Hydrolases