Differential Impact of Class I and Class II Panel Reactive Antibodies on Post-Heart Transplant Outcomes

J Card Fail. 2021 Jan;27(1):40-47. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2020.07.012. Epub 2020 Aug 1.

Abstract

Background: Sensitized patients awaiting heart transplantation spend a longer time on the waitlist and have higher mortality. We are now able to further characterize sensitization by discriminating antibodies against class I and II, but the differential impact of these has not been assessed systematically.

Methods and results: Using United Network for Organ Sharing data (2004-2015), we analyzed 17,361 adult heart transplant patients whose class I and II panel reactive antibodies were reported. Patients were divided into 4 groups: class I and II ≤25% (group 1); class I ≤25% and class II ˃25% (group 2); class II ≤25% and class I >25% (group 3); and both class I and II >25% (group 4). Outcomes assessed were treated rejection at 1-year mortality, all-cause mortality, and rejection-related mortality. Compared with group 1, only group 4 was associated with a higher risk of treated rejection at 1 year (odds ratio 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.64), all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.24, 95% CI 1.06-1.46), and mortality owing to rejection (subhazard ratio 1.84, 95% CI 1.18-2.85), whereas groups 2 and 3 were not (P > .05).

Conclusions: Combined elevation in class I and II panel reactive antibodies seem to increase the risk of treated rejection and all-cause mortality, whereas risk with isolated elevation is unclear.

Keywords: Heart transplantation; allograft rejection; panel reactive antibody.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Graft Rejection / epidemiology
  • Heart Failure*
  • Heart Transplantation*
  • Humans
  • Isoantibodies
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Factors

Substances

  • Isoantibodies