Elsevier

Journal of Cardiac Failure

Volume 26, Issue 12, December 2020, Pages 1050-1059
Journal of Cardiac Failure

Metabolomic Profile in HFpEF vs HFrEF Patients

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2020.07.010Get rights and content

ABSTRACT

Background

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are associated with metabolic derangements, which may have different pathophysiological implications.

Methods and Results

In new-onset HFpEF (EF of ≥50%, n = 46) and HFrEF (EF of <40%, n = 75) patients, 109 endogenous plasma metabolites including amino acids, phospholipids and acylcarnitines were assessed using targeted metabolomics. Differentially altered metabolites and associations with clinical characteristics were explored. Patients with HFpEF were older, more often female with hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and diabetes compared with patients with HFrEF. Patients with HFpEF displayed higher levels of hydroxyproline and symmetric dimethyl arginine, alanine, cystine, and kynurenine reflecting fibrosis, inflammation and oxidative stress. Serine, cGMP, cAMP, l-carnitine, lysophophatidylcholine (18:2), lactate, and arginine were lower compared with patients with HFrEF. In patients with HFpEF with diabetes, kynurenine was higher (P = .014) and arginine lower (P = .014) vs patients with no diabetes, but did not differ with diabetes status in HFrEF. Decreasing kynurenine was associated with higher eGFR only in HFpEF (Pinteraction = .020).

Conclusions

Patients with new-onset HFpEF compared with patients with new-onset HFrEF display a different metabolic profile associated with comorbidities, such as diabetes and kidney dysfunction. HFpEF is associated with indices of increased inflammation and oxidative stress, impaired lipid metabolism, increased collagen synthesis, and downregulated nitric oxide signaling. Together, these findings suggest a more predominant systemic microvascular endothelial dysfunction and inflammation linked to increased fibrosis in HFpEF compared with HFrEF. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03671122 https://clinicaltrials.gov

Section snippets

Patients

From 2015 to 2018 patients with new-onset HF were recruited to the Preserved and Reduced Ejection Fraction Epidemiological Regional Study (PREFERS study) at five hospital-based HF clinics in Stockholm. The study protocol has previously been described.12. The present analysis includes patients enrolled in 2015 and 2016. In brief, patients with previously undiagnosed HF presented to hospital either with acute signs and symptoms of HF or in stable condition at the outpatient clinic with an N

Results

The clinical characteristics of the 46 patients with HFpEF and 75 patients with HFrEF are presented in Table 1. Most patients were in New York Heart Association functional class II at the time of assessment. Patients with HFpEF were more than 10 years older, more often female with a nonsignificantly higher body mass index, and a higher prevalence of hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and diabetes compared with HFrEF. Filling pressure estimates were moderately increased in both groups with a

Discussion

In this exploratory study, patients with new-onset HFpEF had a diverging metabolite pattern compared with patients with new-onset HFrEF, reflecting potential differences in pathophysiologic mechanisms. First, patients with HFpEF displayed elevated hydroxyproline reflecting fibrosis, elevated SDMA indicating oxidative stress, and elevated alanine, cystine, and kynurenine, reflecting a state of increased inflammation compared with patients with HFrEF. Second, patients with HFpEF had lower levels

Serine

We found lower serine levels in HFpEF compared with HFrEF replicating similar findings on sphingomyelins in HFpEF9 and atrial fibrillation. In HFpEF mouse models, serine deficiency has been associated with oxidative stress23 and reversely serine supply to decrease cardiac fibrosis and left ventricular mass index may be due to decreased transforming growth factor-β signaling.24 In addition to lower levels of lysoPC (18:2) in our patients with HFpEF, our findings indicate further dysregulation in

Limitations

The PREFERS study was designed before the European Society of Cardiology HFpEF criteria were established in 2016 and therefore did not include specific requirements for structural impairments. However, in the HFpEF group 84% fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for HFpEF according to European Society of Cardiology guidelines.1 It would have been valuable to have had healthy subjects as controls; however, this option was not available at the time. We provide two methods (OPLS-DA and logistic

Conclusions

In patients with new-onset HF, HFpEF was associated with increased hydroxyproline, SDMA, alanine, cystine, and kynurenine and decreased cGMP, cAMP, serine, l-carnitine, lysoPC (18:2), lactate, and arginine compared with HFrEF. In HFpEF but not in HFrEF, metabolites were modulated by comorbidities such as diabetes and kidney dysfunction. The overall HFpEF metabolic profile in this exploratory study reflects increased inflammation and oxidative stress, impaired lipid metabolism, increased

Disclosures

CH reports consulting fees from Novartis and Roche Diagnostics and speaker and honoraria from MSD; CL reports research grants, speaker honoraria and consulting fees from Medtronic, Abbot, Impulse Dynamics, Novartis, Bayer, Vifor, Microport, Boston Scientific, AstraZeneca and Orion Pharma. HP reports research grants from AstraZeneca; HW reports speakers fee from Bayer AG and Fujimori Kogyo Co, and research grants from Boehringer Ingelheim and Fujimori Kogyo Co. ME reports consulting fee and

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Ulrika Löfström (MD), Ulla Wedén (MD), Carin Corovic Cabrera (MD), Per Eldhagen (MD), Jenny Stenudd (JS), Eva Andersson (RN), Karin Karlsson (RN), Fauzia Abdullahi-Moalim (RN), Gunnel Löfgren (RN), and Emma Berg (RN) for organizational work at the HF clinics and taking care of patients.

References (38)

  • S Bahri et al.

    Citrulline: from metabolism to therapeutic use

    Nutrition

    (2013)
  • P Ponikowski et al.

    2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure

    Eur J Heart Fail

    (2016)
  • PB Sandesara et al.

    The prognostic significance of diabetes and microvascular complications in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

    Diabetes Care

    (2018)
  • CS Lam et al.

    Microvascular endothelial dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

    Heart

    (2016)
  • BN Zordoky et al.

    Metabolomic fingerprint of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

    PLoS One

    (2015)
  • WG Hunter et al.

    Metabolic dysfunction in heart failure: diagnostic, prognostic, and pathophysiologic insights from metabolomic profiling

    Curr Heart Fail Rep

    (2016)
  • C Linde et al.

    Rationale and design of the PREFERS (Preserved and Reduced Ejection Fraction Epidemiological Regional Study) Stockholm heart failure study: an epidemiological regional study in Stockholm county of 2.1 million inhabitants

    Eur J Heart Fail

    (2016)
  • J Trygg et al.

    Orthogonal projections to latent structures (O-PLS)

    J Chemometrics

    (2002)
  • M Bylesjö et al.

    OPLS discriminant analysis: combining the strengths of PLS-DA and SIMCA classification

    J Chemometrics

    (2006)
  • Cited by (47)

    • Cardiac macrophage metabolism in health and disease

      2024, Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism
    • Immunometabolism at the Heart of Cardiovascular Disease

      2023, JACC: Basic to Translational Science
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Funding: Supported by a collaborative grant from Astra Zeneca; Gothenburg, Sweden to the Science for Life Laboratory (No. 1377).

    View full text