Clinical paperCharacteristics and outcomes of cardiac arrest survivors with acute pulmonary embolism
Introduction
Acute pulmonary embolism (PE), one of the manifestations of venous thromboembolic disease affects an estimated 300,000–600,000 individuals in United States each year, causing around 100,000 deaths.1, 2, 3 It is estimated that around 5% of these PE cases may progress to cardiac arrest with a mortality rate of up to 90%.4, 5 PE is responsible for 10–13% of outside hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and 6% of in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA).6, 7, 8, 9 Studies have suggested that the occurrences of cardiac arrest could be even higher as many cases are detected only at the time of autopsy after death.10 The American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology resuscitation guidelines make no distinction in resuscitation procedures for a patient with suspected PE. However, the European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommends a longer 60–90 min cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in patients who receive intravenous thrombolytic compared to the normal resuscitation protocol.9, 11, 12 However, the relative outcomes of patients with cardiac arrest secondary to PE in comparison to other causes of cardiac arrest are still unknown. Describing the characteristics of these patients and their outcomes could provide us with an insight into epidemiology and natural history of this subset of cardiac arrest patients. Therefore, we described the clinical characteristics of cardiac arrest survivors with PE and their outcomes in comparison with non-PE cardiac arrest patients.
Section snippets
Patient population and settings
This is a retrospective cohort study conducted at a large tertiary care hospital with a large catchment area covering western North Carolina. We performed a chart review of 4047 consecutive patients that had a diagnosis of cardiac arrest at Wake Forest Baptist Hospital over a period of 6 years (January 1, 2012–December 31, 2017). We included all adult consecutive patients with out of hospital and in hospital cardiac arrest that survived after a successful CPR beyond 24 h or more. Cardiac arrest
Baseline characteristics
Among 996 successfully resuscitated cardiac arrest patients included in the study, 87 (8.7%) patients were diagnosed with acute central PE. The baseline characteristics of the patients are given in Table 1. Both study groups were of similar age (acute PE 63.8 ± 14.2 years vs.no PE 62.4 ± 14.8 years) and had similar distribution of men (acute PE 66% vs. no PE 60%). The prevalence of smokers and in-hospital cardiac arrest were higher while the use of targeted temperature management was lower in
Discussion
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that has evaluated the survival in cardiac arrest PE survivors and compared with those without PE. We observed that the mortality of cardiac arrest survivors with and without PE was not significantly different. We also did not observe a significant impact of thrombolytics on mortality in this group. There were several predictors of mortality in PE patients including age, female sex, diabetes, end-stage renal disease and use of targeted
Conclusions
In conclusion, the study demonstrated that patients with cardiac arrest and PE had a similar survival outcome as those without PE. The use of thrombolytic did not have survival benefit in patients with cardiac arrest survivors with acute PE. The study also highlights the importance of early diagnosis and prevention of acute PE as the outcomes are poor after cardiac arrest even in best institutions with mechanical circulatory devices.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Bhupendar Tayal: Methodology. Kristian Hay Kragholm: Validation. Youssef Masmoudi: Data curation. John Azizian: Data curation. Lawson Mcdonald: Data curation. Amandeep Goyal: Writing - review & editing. Peter Sogaard: Conceptualization. Waqas T. Qureshi: Formal analysis.
References (26)
- et al.
Management strategies and determinants of outcome in acute major pulmonary embolism: results of a multicenter registry
J Am Coll Cardiol
(1997) - et al.
Causes of in-hospital cardiac arrest — incidences and rate of recognition
Resuscitation
(2015) - et al.
European Resuscitation Council guidelines for resuscitation 2015: section 4. Cardiac arrest in special circumstances
Resuscitation
(2015) - et al.
Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: CHEST guideline and expert panel report
Chest
(2016) - et al.
Thrombolysis during resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest caused by pulmonary embolism increases 30-day survival: findings from the French National Cardiac Arrest Registry
Chest
(2019) - et al.
Pulmonary embolism related sudden cardiac arrest admitted alive at hospital: management and outcomes
Resuscitation
(2017) - et al.
Thrombolysis during resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest caused by pulmonary embolism increases 30-day survival: findings from the French National Cardiac Arrest Registry
Chest
(2019) - et al.
European Resuscitation Council guidelines for resuscitation: 2017 update
Resuscitation
(2018) - et al.
Cardiac arrest due to pulmonary embolism
Indian Heart J
(2018) - et al.
European resuscitation council guidelines for resuscitation: 2018 update — antiarrhythmic drugs for cardiac arrest
Resuscitation
(2019)
Major bleeding complications in cardiopulmonary resuscitation: the place of thrombolytic therapy in cardiac arrest due to massive pulmonary embolism
Resuscitation.
Secular trends in occurrence of acute venous thromboembolism: the Worcester VTE study (1985–2009)
Am J Med
Cardiology patient pages. The Surgeon General’s call to action to prevent deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism
Circulation
Cited by (4)
Resuscitation highlights in 2020
2021, ResuscitationCitation Excerpt :Current guidelines suggest thrombolysis for cardiac arrest caused by pulmonary embolism (PE), and the use of extracorporeal-CPR (ECPR) in those settings where it is feasible.3,65 In a US observational study of both OHCA and IHCA survivors at 24 h post CPR, 87 (8.7%) out of 996 patients were diagnosed with an acute PE.66 Survival in the acute PE group was similar to the non-PE group (68.3% vs. 64%) with a medial follow up of 14 days (IQR 3–302 days).
Clinical Experiences of High-Risk Pulmonary Thromboembolism Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Single Institution
2022, Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases