Elsevier

Heart Rhythm

Volume 17, Issue 12, December 2020, Pages 2154-2163
Heart Rhythm

Clinical
Imaging/Mapping
Simultaneous epicardial–endocardial mapping of the sinus node in humans with structural heart disease: Impact of overdrive suppression on sinoatrial exits

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.06.034Get rights and content

Background

The 3-dimensional (3D) nature of sinoatrial node (SAN) function has not been characterized in the intact human heart.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to characterize the 3D nature of SAN function in patients with structural heart disease (SHD) using simultaneous endocardial–epicardial (endo–epi) phase mapping.

Methods

Simultaneous intraoperative endo–epi SAN mapping was performed during sinus rhythm at baseline (SRbaseline) and postoverdrive suppression at 600 ms (SRpost-pace600) and 400 ms (SRpost-pace400) using 2 Abbott Advisor HD Grid Mapping Catheters. Unipolar and bipolar electrograms (EGMs) were exported for phase analysis to determine (1) activation exits; (2) wavefront propagation sequence; (3) endo–epi dissociation; and (4) fractionation. Comparison of these variables was made among the 3 rhythms from an endo–epi perspective.

Results

Sixteen patients with SHD were included. SRbaseline activations were unicentric and predominantly exited cranially (87.5%) with endo–epi synchrony. However, with overdrive suppression, a tendency for caudal exit shift and endo–epi asynchrony was observed: SRpost-pace600 vs SRbaseline: cranial endo 75% vs 87.5% (P = .046); cranial epi 68.8% vs 87.5% (P = 0.002); caudal endo 12.5% vs 6.2% (P = 0.215); caudal epi 25% vs 6.2% (P = .0003); and SRpost-pace400 vs SRbaseline: cranial endo 81.3% vs 87.5% (P = 0.335); cranial epi 68.7% vs 87.5% (P = 0.0034; caudal endo 12.5% vs 6.2% (P = .148); caudal epi 31.2% vs 6.2% (P = 0.0017), consistent with multicentricity. EGM fractionation was more prevalent with overdrive suppression.

Conclusion

During mapping of the intact human heart, SAN demonstrated redundancy of sinoatrial exits with postoverdrive shift in sites of earliest activation and epi–endo dissociation of sinoatrial exits.

Introduction

The sinoatrial node (SAN) is a collection of specialized cells that are situated at the junction of the superior vena cava (SVC) and right atrium (RA) in the epicardial sulcus terminalis and extend a variable distance along the long axis of the crista terminalis inferiorly.1,2 Human mapping studies have suggested an extensive integrated sinus pacemaker complex with dynamic variation in the site of earliest activation.3, 4, 5

Recent studies using integrated intramural optical mapping combined with 3-dimensional (3D) histologic reconstruction in isolated preparations have demonstrated the 3D nature of the SAN. Multiple pacemaker sites and multiple preferential sinoatrial conduction pathways (SACPs) exist with both endocardial and epicardial exits. With suppression of 1 pacemaker or conduction pathway, activation of a subsidiary pacemaker with conduction over an alternate pathway maintains SAN function.6,7 This redundancy of pacemakers and conduction pathways results in a robust system that is resistant to failure.

Sick sinus syndrome is the most common indication for bradycardia pacing and usually occurs in the context of advanced SAN and atrial remodeling.4,8, 9, 10 In this setting, atrial arrhythmias frequently coexist, and pauses usually occur immediately after termination of atrial fibrillation (AF).11 Although the 3D nature of atrial conduction has been demonstrated in isolated preparations, the relative importance of endocardial and epicardial SAN exits and how they are modified by overdrive suppression in the intact atrium has not been evaluated.

In this study, we used simultaneous endocardial and epicardial phase mapping of the SAN during sinus rhythm (SR) and after overdrive suppression to further characterize the preferential nature of sinoatrial conduction in humans with structural heart disease (SHD) undergoing cardiac surgery.

Section snippets

Study population

Patients undergoing cardiac surgery for ischemic and/or valvular heart disease at Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia, were included. Patients with a history of catheter ablation for atrial arrhythmias were excluded. All patients gave written informed consent before the surgery. The study protocol was approved by the research and ethics committee of Melbourne Health.

Data acquisition

After median sternotomy and before cardiopulmonary bypass, simultaneous epicardial and endocardial mapping of the

Baseline characteristics

We studied 16 patients (12 male; age 60.5 ± 4.1 years) who underwent cardiac surgery for ischemic heart disease or valvulopathy. None of the patients had symptomatic SAN dysfunction. Mean left atrial volume of the cohort was 58 ± 12.4 mL/m2. A minority of patients (n = 3) had a history of paroxysmal AF. Baseline characteristics of the study population are given in Table 1.

Sinus node exits: Baseline vs postoverdrive suppression

A total of 149 activations were analyzed (9.3 ± 1.4 per patient). Mean cycle length during SRbaseline was 902 ± 126 ms.

Discussion

Simultaneous endo–epi phase mapping of human SAN in patients with SHD at baseline and postoverdrive suppression revealed the following key findings. (1) Predominant cranial exits with symmetrical activation sites on the endocardial and epicardial surfaces during SRbaseline. (2) Postpacing caudal shift in the activation exits with marked asymmetry in endo–epi exit sites consistent with multicentricity and redundancy of sinoatrial conduction. Differential epi–endo breakout sites resulted in

Conclusion

In the current study, we performed simultaneous epi–endo mapping of the human sinus node in the intact heart to further characterize the 3D characteristics of sinus node function and the impact of overdrive suppression. After overdrive suppression there was a tendency to caudal shift in exits, differential and hence multicentric endo–epi breakthroughs, asymmetrical wavefront propagation associated with EED, and increased EGM fractionation.

References (19)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (11)

  • Three-dimensional functional anatomy of the human sinoatrial node for epicardial and endocardial mapping and ablation

    2023, Heart Rhythm
    Citation Excerpt :

    Furthermore, ex vivo NIOM studies suggest that transmural conduction from intramural SAN pacemaker through superior and/or inferior SACP to atria can lead to differences between epicardial vs endocardial layers where exits from the SAN head could be predicted to be seen earlier on epicardium vs endocardium, whereas exits from SAN tail will be seen earlier on endocardium vs epicardium (Figure 5D).20,21 Using simultaneous endocardial and epicardial mapping of the human SAN, Parameswaran et al44 demonstrated postpacing caudal shift in SAN exits with marked asymmetry in endo–epicardial exit sites, resulting in significant postpacing endo–epicardial dissociation of activation (Figure 5E). These findings of complex intramural SAN activation and exit patterns add to the challenges of meaningful electrode mapping.

  • Characterization of the pace-and-drive capacity of the human sinoatrial node: A 3D in silico study

    2022, Biophysical Journal
    Citation Excerpt :

    These observations highlight the importance of the SEP dimensions, which modulate the hyperpolarizing effect of the CT cells on the SAN cells. Robust SAN pace-and-drive capacity depends on the ability to shift the LPS to avoid exit block and overcome the source-sink mismatch (2,6,7,11,18,24,25,40,54), combined with the variability of the default LPS location from one patient to another (52). However, the reasons that lead to an LPS shift remained largely unclear, and Kharche et al., for instance, modeled this phenomenon by displacing the LPS arbitrarily to different locations (25).

  • Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia: Etiology, Pathophysiology, and Management: JACC Review Topic of the Week

    2022, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Historically, sinus impulse was envisioned as originating from a discrete focus at the superior vena cava (SVC)/right atrial junction and propagating through specialized atrial conducting tissue.12 However, advances in multi-electrode mapping have led to the identification of the 3-dimensional complexity of the sinus node with different exits at various heart rates.13 In addition, Brennan et al14 demonstrated the presence of spatially distinct dual sino atrial (SA) nodal sites.

  • Sinus node exit, crista terminalis conduction, interatrial connection, and wavefront collision: Key features of human atrial activation in sinus rhythm

    2022, Heart Rhythm
    Citation Excerpt :

    Considerable efforts have been invested in understanding atrial activation during sinus rhythm. However, most studies conducted over the past decades have faced one of the following pitfalls: (1) abnormal tissue remodeling, when fibrotic atria with altered wavefront propagation were included for analysis; (2) low spatial resolution, due to poor reconstruction accuracy or recording density as provided by early electroanatomic mapping systems; and (3) piecemeal electrophysiological study, when limited to 1 atrium or even 1 atrial structure.4–12 To circumvent these limitations, we sought to comprehensively characterize normal atrial activation in patients with preserved voltage using stepwise biatrial high-density mapping focused on the interplay between distinct activation sequences in sinus rhythm.

  • Endo-Epicardial Mapping of In Vivo Human Sinoatrial Node Activity

    2021, JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Previous research has shown that EEA in the atrial wall plays an important role in the development of atrial tachyarrhythmias and may initiate re-entry (9,19,20). A recent study by Parameswaran et al. (6) also identified EEA at SAN exit sites (4 × 4 electrodes, 3-mm interelectrode distance). EEA was determined by: 1) comparing regional differences in distribution of SAN exit sites; 2) assessing the endo-epicardial wave front propagation sequence; and 3) determining the difference in phase value ≥20 ms between opposing endo-epicardial electrodes.

View all citing articles on Scopus

Funding sources/Disclosures: Drs Parameswaran, Nalliah, Wong, Anderson, Voskoboinik, Sugumar, and Chieng are supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) research scholarship. Drs Kalman and Sanders are supported by practitioner fellowships from the NHMRC. Dr Morris is supported by a British Heart Foundation Intermediate Fellowship; has reported receiving research support from Boston Scientific and Medtronic; and has served on the advisory board of Boston Scientific and Biosense Webster. Dr Kalman has reported receiving research support from Biosense Webster, Boston Scientific, Abbott, and Medtronic; and has served on the advisory board of Boston Scientific and Biosense Webster. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

View full text