Elsevier

The American Journal of Cardiology

Volume 130, 1 September 2020, Pages 85-93
The American Journal of Cardiology

Comparison of Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure With Versus Without Lead-Induced Tricuspid Regurgitation After Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices Implantations

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.05.039Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The etiology of worsened tricuspid regurgitation (TR) after cardiac implantable electronic devices implantations are classified into lead-induced and non-lead-induced TR.

  • Three-dimensional echocardiography is helpful in diagnosis the etiology of worsened TR.

  • Severities of non-lead-induced TR change depending on heart failure (HF) status by HF therapy.

  • Lead-induced TR persists and causes refractory HF.

  • Lead-induced TR is associated with a poorer prognosis than non-lead-induced TR.

Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) implantations may cause lead-induced tricuspid regurgitation (LITR). Although patients with CIED have the risk of functional non-lead induced TR (Non-LITR). This study aimed to compare of clinical outcome between LITR and Non-LITR. The mechanism of TR was determined by 3-dimensional echocardiography. The primary end point was heart failure (HF) hospitalizations after CIED implantation. In patients with HF events, subsequent clinical outcomes after HF hospitalization were compared between no TR, LITR, and Non-LITR groups. In eligible 373 patients, 67 patients had HF hospitalization, of whom worsened TR was observed in 49 patients. In the remaining 307 patients, worsened TR was observed in only 10 patients (3.3%). Of the 49 patients with worsened TR, 18 patients (37%) had LITR. In 67 patients with HF hospitalization, 25 patients (37%) met rehospitalization. All severe LITR persisted after HF events. Meanwhile, severe Non-LITR improved to moderate or mild level. Cox proportional hazard model analyses revealed LITR was the independent risk factor of rehospitalization. Both LITR and Non-LITR were common at HF events after CIED implantations. However, LITR persisted and might contribute to a worse prognosis. In patients with TR after CIED implantations, 3-dimensional echocardiography should be performed to diagnose the LITR accurately, which may contribute to improving the clinical outcome.

Section snippets

Methods

Retrospectively, patients who were followed after CIED implantation from April 2011 to May 2017 at the University of Tsukuba hospital were enrolled. Patients who had moderate or more TR before CIED implantation were excluded. The hospital ethics committee approved the research protocol, and we provided information about this study online to allow patients to opt out (http://www.md.tsukuba.ac.jp/clinical-med/cardiology/research_group/research_group07.html).

First, we compared the baseline and

Results

Finally, 373 patients were studied among 379 patients with CIED implantation who were followed in the University of Tsukuba Hospital. The excluded 4 patients had moderate or severe TR at baseline, and the remaining 2 patients had inadequate echocardiographic images to determine the cause of worsened TR.

During a follow-up period of 6 to 24 months (median: 11 months), 67 (18%) patients hospitalized due to HF (Table 1). As compared with patients without HF events, the HF events group had

Discussion

The major findings are as follows: (1) worsened TR was observed in more than a half of patients with HF events after CIED implantation, of which LITR was less than half but had severe grade in all cases; (2) all patients with LITR were hospitalized due to HF, which was observed more in patients with CRT; (3) LITR was associated with poor clinical outcomes after discharge of HF events compared with Non-LITR, and was selected as the independent risk factor of rehospitalization; and (4) the course

The contribution of each author is as fllows

Yoshihiro Seo: Conceptualization, Writing-Original Draft, Writing - Review & Editing, Visualization. Hideki Nakajima: Development or design of methodology; creation of models, Writing-Original Draft, Visualization. Tomoko Ishizu, Noriko Iida, Kimi Sato, Masayoshi Yamamoto, Tomoko Machino-Ohtsuka: Investigation and Formal analysis. Akihiko Nogami, Nobuyuki Ohte and Masaki Ieda: Supervision and Project administration

Declaration of Interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relations that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this study.

Cited by (8)

View all citing articles on Scopus

Funding sources: None

Declarations of interest: None

View full text