Long-term percentage of ventricular pacing in patients requiring pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A multicenter 10-year experience

Heart Rhythm. 2020 Nov;17(11):1897-1903. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.05.040. Epub 2020 Jun 5.

Abstract

Background: Recent studies suggest that atrioventricular (AV) conduction may recover after pacemaker (PM) implantation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), but little is known about long-term follow-up of such patients.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term percentage of right ventricular pacing in patients who underwent TAVR and required PM implantation stratified based on the indication for permanent pacing.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients who underwent TAVR from February 2008 to August 2019 at 3 centers was performed. Patients already implanted with a PM/implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) before TAVR, implanted with a cardiac resynchronization therapy device, or implanted >30 days after TAVR were excluded. Eligible patients were divided into 2 groups based on the presence (persistent atrioventricular block [AVB] group) or absence (nonpersistent AVB group) of persistent third-degree AVB after TAVR.

Results: A total of 1594 patients underwent TAVR. Two hundred four patients were implanted with a PM or ICD after TAVR and 32 met exclusion criteria, so 172 patients were eligible (median time TAVR-PM implant 4 days) for a total of 352 follow-up visits analyzed. A significant difference in the percentage of ventricular pacing was observed at follow-up performed 7-90 days after implantation (98% persistent AVB group vs 8% nonpersistent AVB group; P <.001). This difference remained significant at follow-up performed 91-270 days (95% vs 3.5%; P <.001), 271-540 days (95.5% vs 3%; P = .006), and 541-900 days (97.4% vs 2.2%; P <.001) after implantation.

Conclusion: Patients requiring PM implantation due to persistent third-degree AVB after TAVR were less likely to show AV conduction recovery, whereas patients implanted for other indications showed a low percentage of pacing during follow-up.

Keywords: Atrioventricular conduction; Pacemaker; Pacing; Recovery; Transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Aortic Valve / surgery*
  • Atrioventricular Block / etiology
  • Atrioventricular Block / physiopathology
  • Atrioventricular Block / therapy*
  • Cardiac Pacing, Artificial / methods*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Heart Conduction System / physiopathology*
  • Heart Valve Diseases / surgery*
  • Heart Ventricles / physiopathology
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Postoperative Complications*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Factors
  • Time Factors
  • Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement / adverse effects*