Long-term variations of FFR and iFR after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Int J Cardiol. 2020 Oct 15:317:37-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.05.085. Epub 2020 Jun 3.

Abstract

Long-term variations of fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-free-ratio (iFR) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) have not been previously assessed. A total of 23 coronary lesions in 14 patients with aortic stenosis (AS) underwent physiology assessment at baseline, immediately after TAVI and at 14(7-29) months of follow-up. The angiographic severity of the lesions did not progress at follow-up (54[45-64] vs 54[49-63], p = .53). Overall, FFR (0.87[0.85-0.92] vs 0.88[0.82-0.92], p = .45) and iFR (0.88[0.85-0.96] vs 0.91[0.86-0.97], p = .30) did not change significantly compared with the baseline. FFR decreased in 3(13%) lesions with abnormal baseline value, whereas it remained stable in lesions with FFR > 0.80. Conversely, iFR did not show a systematic trend at long-term after TAVI. However, iFR demonstrated a higher reclassification rate at follow-up compared with FFR (p = .02). In conclusions, in this exploratory study, only minor variations of coronary physiology indices were observed at long-term after TAVI. Nevertheless, caution should be exercised in the interpretation of borderline FFR and iFR values in severe AS.

Keywords: Aortic stenosis; Coronary artery disease; Fractional flow reserve; Instantaneous wave-free ratio; Long-term; Transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

MeSH terms

  • Cardiac Catheterization
  • Coronary Angiography
  • Coronary Artery Disease*
  • Coronary Stenosis*
  • Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial*
  • Humans
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement* / adverse effects