Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Polymer-free drug-coated vs. bare-metal coronary stents in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a subgroup analysis of the LEADERS FREE trial

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clinical Research in Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aims

To compare the outcomes of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery (NCS) after PCI with either a drug-coated stent (DCS) or a bare-metal stent (BMS), followed by 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy and to explore the impact of the timing of NCS.

Methods

This is a subgroup analysis of the LEADERS FREE trial. The primary safety end point was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis, and the primary efficacy end point was clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR).

Results

Out of 2432 patients included in the LEADERS FREE trial, 278 (11.4%) underwent NCS within 1 year after PCI. Among NCS patients, the 1-year safety end point was numerically lower with DCS; however, this difference was not significant as compared to BMS (4.7% vs. 10.1%, HR: 0.459 [0.178–1.183], p = 0.099), clinically driven TLR was significantly lower after DCS (2.4% vs. 8.3%, HR: 0.281 [0.079—0.996], p = 0.036), and BARC 3–5 bleeding was similar with DCS vs. BMS (10.2% vs. 7.5%, p = 0.438). In patients treated with BMS, NCS within 3 months after PCI was associated with higher incidence of the safety end point than NCSs performed later: 14.9% vs. 4.4%, HR: 3.586 [1.012–12.709], p = 0.034. The timing of surgery had no impact on patients treated with DCS (4.7% vs. 4.7%, p = 0.947).

Conclusions

Among patients undergoing NCS after PCI, DCS-treated patients had a lower probability of clinically driven TLR compared with BMS. However, there was no significant difference in the occurrence of the primary composite safety end point or bleeding complications. Early NCS after BMS-PCI was associated with impaired safety, while the timing of NCS had no such influence after DCS implantation.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hawn MT, Graham LA, Richman JS, Itani KM, Henderson WG, Maddox TM (2013) Risk of major adverse cardiac events following noncardiac surgery in patients with coronary stents. JAMA 310(14):1462–1472. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.278787

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gandhi NK, Abdel-Karim AR, Banerjee S, Brilakis ES (2011) Frequency and risk of noncardiac surgery after drug-eluting stent implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 77(7):972–976. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.22744

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hawn MT, Graham LA, Richman JR, Itani KM, Plomondon ME, Altom LK et al (2012) The incidence and timing of noncardiac surgery after cardiac stent implantation. J Am Coll Surg. 214(4):658–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.12.011(discussion 66-7)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stone GW, Rizvi A, Newman W, Mastali K, Wang JC, Caputo R et al (2010) Everolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 362(18):1663–1674. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0910496

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, Montalescot G, Ruzyllo W, Gottlieb S et al (2007) Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 357(20):2001–2015. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0706482

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Urban P, Mehran R, Colleran R, Angiolillo DJ, Byrne RA, Capodanno D et al (2019) Defining high bleeding risk in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation 140(3):240–261. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.040167

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Colleran R, Kastrati A (2018) Percutaneous coronary intervention: balloons, stents and scaffolds. Clin Res Cardiol 107(Suppl 2):55–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-018-1328-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Valgimigli M, Bueno H, Byrne RA, Collet JP, Costa F, Jeppsson A et al (2018) 2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS: The Task Force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J 39(3):213–260. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, Bailey SR, Bittl JA, Cercek B et al (2011) 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol 58(24):e44–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Levine GN, Bates ER, Bittl JA, Brindis RG, Fihn SD, Fleisher LA et al (2016) 2016 ACC/AHA Guideline Focused Update on Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 68(10):1082–1115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fleisher LA, Fleischmann KE, Auerbach AD, Barnason SA, Beckman JA, Bozkurt B et al (2014) 2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 64(22):e77–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.07.944

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Varenhorst C, Lindholm M, Sarno G, Olivecrona G, Jensen U, Nilsson J et al (2018) Stent thrombosis rates the first year and beyond with new- and old-generation drug-eluting stents compared to bare metal stents. Clin Res Cardiol 107(9):816–823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-018-1252-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Hidvegi R, Puelacher C, Gualandro DM, Lampart A, Lurati Buse G, Hammerer-Lerchner A et al (2020) Obesity paradox and perioperative myocardial infarction/injury in non-cardiac surgery. Clin Res Cardiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-020-01605-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Berger PB, Kleiman NS, Pencina MJ, Hsieh WH, Steinhubl SR, Jeremias A et al (2010) Frequency of major noncardiac surgery and subsequent adverse events in the year after drug-eluting stent placement results from the EVENT (Evaluation of Drug-Eluting Stents and Ischemic Events) Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 3(9):920–927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2010.03.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kaluza GL, Joseph J, Lee JR, Raizner ME, Raizner AE (2000) Catastrophic outcomes of noncardiac surgery soon after coronary stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol 35(5):1288–1294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Siller-Matula JM, Petre A, Delle-Karth G, Huber K, Ay C, Lordkipanidze M et al (2017) Impact of preoperative use of P2Y12 receptor inhibitors on clinical outcomes in cardiac and non-cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 6(8):753–770. https://doi.org/10.1177/2048872615585516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Urban P, Meredith IT, Abizaid A, Pocock SJ, Carrie D, Naber C et al (2015) Polymer-free drug-coated coronary stents in patients at high bleeding risk. N Engl J Med 373(21):2038–2047. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1503943

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tada N, Virmani R, Grant G, Bartlett L, Black A, Clavijo C et al (2010) Polymer-free biolimus a9-coated stent demonstrates more sustained intimal inhibition, improved healing, and reduced inflammation compared with a polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting cypher stent in a porcine model. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 3(2):174–183. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.877522

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Garot P, Morice MC, Tresukosol D, Pocock SJ, Meredith IT, Abizaid A et al (2017) 2-year outcomes of high bleeding risk patients after polymer-free drug-coated stents. J Am Coll Cardiol 69(2):162–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.10.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Simoons ML, Chaitman BR, White HD et al (2012) Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 60(16):1581–1598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.08.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, Boam A, Cohen DJ, van Es GA et al (2007) Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation 115(17):2344–2351. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.685313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mehran R, Rao SV, Bhatt DL, Gibson CM, Caixeta A, Eikelboom J et al (2011) Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Circulation 123(23):2736–2747. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.009449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Merritt JC, Bhatt DL (2004) The efficacy and safety of perioperative antiplatelet therapy. J Thromb Thrombolysis 17(1):21–27. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:THRO.0000036025.07348.f1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Burger W, Chemnitius JM, Kneissl GD, Rucker G (2005) Low-dose aspirin for secondary cardiovascular prevention—cardiovascular risks after its perioperative withdrawal versus bleeding risks with its continuation—review and meta-analysis. J Intern Med 257(5):399–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2796.2005.01477.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mehran R, Baber U, Steg PG, Ariti C, Weisz G, Witzenbichler B et al (2013) Cessation of dual antiplatelet treatment and cardiac events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PARIS): 2 year results from a prospective observational study. Lancet 382(9906):1714–1722. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61720-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Richardt G, Maillard L, Nazzaro MS, Abdel-Wahab M, Carrie D, Iniguez A et al (2019) Polymer-free drug-coated coronary stents in diabetic patients at high bleeding risk: a pre-specified sub-study of the LEADERS FREE trial. Clin Res Cardiol 108(1):31–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-018-1308-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kaiser C, Galatius S, Erne P, Eberli F, Alber H, Rickli H et al (2010) Drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents in large coronary arteries. N Engl J Med 363(24):2310–2319. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1009406

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Windecker S, Latib A, Kedhi E, Kirtane AJ, Kandzari DE, Mehran R et al (2020) Polymer-based or polymer-free stents in patients at high bleeding risk. N Engl J Med 382(13):1208–1218. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1910021

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lipiecki J, Brunel P, Morice MC, Roguelov C, Walsh SJ, Richardt G et al (2018) Biolimus A9 polymer-free coated stents in high bleeding risk patients undergoing complex PCI: evidence from the LEADERS FREE randomised clinical trial. EuroIntervention 14(4):e418–e425. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Egholm G, Kristensen SD, Thim T, Olesen KK, Madsen M, Jensen SE et al (2016) Risk associated with surgery within 12 months after coronary drug-eluting stent implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 68(24):2622–2632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.09.967

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Holcomb CN, Graham LA, Richman JS, Rhyne RR, Itani KM, Maddox TM et al (2014) The incremental risk of noncardiac surgery on adverse cardiac events following coronary stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol 64(25):2730–2739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mahmoud KD, Sanon S, Habermann EB, Lennon RJ, Thomsen KM, Wood DL et al (2016) Perioperative cardiovascular risk of prior coronary stent implantation among patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 67(9):1038–1049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.11.063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wijeysundera DN, Wijeysundera HC, Yun L, Wasowicz M, Beattie WS, Velianou JL et al (2012) Risk of elective major noncardiac surgery after coronary stent insertion: a population-based study. Circulation 126(11):1355–1362. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.102715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Ms. Sara Sadozai Slama for the great statistical support.

Funding

LEADERS FREE is funded by Biosensors Europe.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdelhakim Allali.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

M.-C. Morice is the chief executive officer and a shareholder of the Cardiovascular European Research Center (CERC). S. Copt and H.-P. Stoll are full-time employees of the sponsor company (Biosensors). P. Urban is a paid consultant to Biosensors, has received honoraria from Edwards Lifesciences during the past 12 months, and is a shareholder of the Cardiovascular European Research Center (CERC). All other authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 2005 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Richardt, G., Abdelghani, M., Allali, A. et al. Polymer-free drug-coated vs. bare-metal coronary stents in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a subgroup analysis of the LEADERS FREE trial. Clin Res Cardiol 110, 162–171 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-020-01672-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-020-01672-3

Keywords

Navigation