Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical outcomes and thrombus resolution in patients with solid left atrial appendage thrombi: results of a single-center real-world registry

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clinical Research in Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Data on thrombus resolution and clinical outcome data after a therapy of LAA thrombus with novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are scarce.

Methods

In this single-center study, we retrospectively analyzed 78 patients diagnosed with a solid LAA thrombus by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). We assessed baseline clinical and echocardiographic characteristics, the anticoagulatory regimens and outcomes of patients with (responders) and without (non-responders) thrombus resolution.

Results

Mean age was 76.1 ± 8.3 years, patients were male in 57.7% and presented with a high risk for thromboembolism (CHA2DS2-VASc: 4.3 ± 1.1). At thrombus diagnosis, 44.9% patients were treated with a NOAC, while 41.0% were under therapy with a VKA. Complete thrombus resolution was achieved after a mean of 116 ± 79 days in a total of 51.3% of patients, 35.9% showed a reduction of thrombus size, whereas 12.8% showed no changes in thrombus dimensions. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of LAA thrombus resolution between VKA and NOACs (41.2 vs. 57.1%, p = 0.18). However, in cases in which only the therapy with a NOAC led to complete thrombus resolution, the time needed was significantly shorter than with VKA (81 ± 38 vs. 129 ± 46 days, p = 0.03). Regarding safety outcomes, no differences in bleeding or thromboembolism were observed between patients with and without thrombus resolution.

Conclusions

In this registry, approximately 85% of LAA thrombi were diagnosed in patients with ongoing OAC. Thrombus resolution was observed in nearly 50% of cases. Although there was no difference in the rate of LAA thrombus resolution between VKA and NOACs, the resolution time was shorter in patients prescribed a NOAC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AF:

Atrial fibrillation

CHA2DS2VASC:

CHA2DS2VASC-score

DAPT:

Dual antiplatelet therapy

Dmax/Dmin:

Maximal/minimal diameter (of the LAA thrombus)

DRT:

Device-related thrombus

HASBLED:

HASBLED-score

ISTH:

International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis

GFR:

Glomerular filtration rate

LA:

Left atrium

LAA:

Left atrial appendage

LVAD:

Left ventricular assist device

LVEF:

Left ventricular ejection fraction

NOAC:

Novel oral anticoagulant

SEC:

Spontaneous echo contrast

TEE:

Transesophageal echocardiography

VKA:

Vitamin-K antagonist

VTE:

Venous thromboembolism

References

  1. Reers S, Agdirlioglu T, Kellner M et al (2016) Incidence of left atrial abnormalities under treatment with dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and vitamin K antagonists. Eur J Med Res 21:41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Scherr D, Sharma K, Dalal D et al (2009) Incidence and predictors of periprocedural cerebrovascular accident in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 20:1357–1363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wallace TW, Atwater BD, Daubert JP et al (2010) Prevalence and clinical characteristics associated with left atrial appendage thrombus in fully anticoagulated patients undergoing catheter-directed atrial fibrillation ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 21:849–852

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen YY, Liu Q, Liu L et al (2016) Effect of metabolic syndrome on risk stratification for left atrial or left atrial appendage thrombus formation in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Chin Med J 129:2395–2402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Iwama M, Kawasaki M, Tanaka R et al (2012) Left atrial appendage emptying fraction assessed by a feature-tracking echocardiographic method is a determinant of thrombus in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. J Cardiol 59:329–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Petersen M, Roehrich A, Balzer J et al (2015) Left atrial appendage morphology is closely associated with specific echocardiographic flow pattern in patients with atrial fibrillation. Europace: Eur Pacing Arrhythmias Cardiac Electrophysiol 17:539–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sedaghat A, Nickenig G, Hammerstingl C (2014) Left atrial appendage closure in a patient with atrial fibrillation after mechanical mitral valve replacement and cardio-embolic stroke despite effective oral anticoagulant therapy: a case report. Clin Res Cardiol 103:587–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Al-Saady NM, Obel OA, Camm AJ (1999) Left atrial appendage: structure, function, and role in thromboembolism. Heart (British Cardiac Society) 82:547–554

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Watson T, Shantsila E, Lip GY (2009) Mechanisms of thrombogenesis in atrial fibrillation: Virchow's triad revisited. Lancet (London, England) 373:155–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Corrigendum to: 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J 2017;39:1109–1109

  11. Hohnloser SH, Basic E, Nabauer M (2019) Uptake in antithrombotic treatment and its association with stroke incidence in atrial fibrillation: insights from a large German claims database. Clin Res Cardiol 108:1042–1052

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. McNamara K, Witry M, Bryant G et al (2019) A prospective, multi-center cohort study: investigating the ability of warfarin-treated patients to predict their INR. Clin Res Cardiol 108:212–217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lip GY, Hammerstingl C, Marin F et al (2016) Left atrial thrombus resolution in atrial fibrillation or flutter: results of a prospective study with rivaroxaban (X-TRA) and a retrospective observational registry providing baseline data (CLOT-AF). Am Heart J 178:126–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sedaghat A, Schrickel JW, Andrie R, Schueler R, Nickenig G, Hammerstingl C (2017) Thrombus formation after left atrial appendage occlusion with the amplatzer amulet device. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 3:71–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bulic M, Nelles D, Luetkens J, Nickenig G, Sedaghat A (2020) 'What you see is what you'll get': giant extra-appendage left atrial thrombus after left atrial appendageocclusion for persisting left atrial appendage thrombus. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 21(4):465

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Troughton RW, Asher CR, Klein AL (2003) The role of echocardiography in atrial fibrillation and cardioversion. Heart (British Cardiac Society) 89:1447–1454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Beppu S, Nimura Y, Sakakibara H, Nagata S, Park YD, Izumi S (1985) Smoke-like echo in the left atrial cavity in mitral valve disease: its features and significance. J Am Coll Cardiol 6:744–749

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Douglas PS, Garcia MJ, Haines DE et al. ACCF/ASE/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR (2011) Appropriate use criteria for echocardiography. a report of the american college of cardiology foundation appropriate use criteria task force, American Society of Echocardiography, American Heart Association, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Critical Care Medicine, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Endorsed by the American College of Chest Physicians. J Am Coll Cardiol 57:1126–66

  19. Gottdiener JS, Bednarz J, Devereux R et al (2004) American Society of Echocardiography recommendations for use of echocardiography in clinical trials. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 17:1086–1119

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Queiros S, Morais P, Barbosa D, Fonseca JC, Vilaca JL, D'Hooge J (2018) MITT: medical image tracking toolbox. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 37:2547–2557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaatz S, Ahmad D, Spyropoulos AC, Schulman S (2015) Definition of clinically relevant non-major bleeding in studies of anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolic disease in non-surgical patients: communication from the SSC of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost 13:2119–2126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim S, Hwang S, Jang HR et al (2019) Creatinine- and cystatin C-based estimated glomerular filtration rate slopes for the prediction of kidney outcome: a comparative retrospective study. BMC Nephrol 20:214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Avezum A, Oliveira GBF, Diaz R et al (2018) Efficacy and safety of dabigatran versus warfarin from the RE-LY trial. Open heart 5:e000800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dentali F, Riva N, Crowther M, Turpie AG, Lip GY, Ageno W (2012) Efficacy and safety of the novel oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Circulation 126:2381–2391

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Giugliano RP, Ruff CT, Braunwald E et al (2013) Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 369:2093–2104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJ et al (2011) Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 365:981–992

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Halperin JL, Hankey GJ, Wojdyla DM et al (2014) Efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin among elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in the Rivaroxaban once daily, oral, direct factor Xa inhibition compared with vitamin K antagonism for prevention of stroke and embolism trial in atrial fibrillation (ROCKET AF). Circulation 130:138–146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Jobski K, Hoffmann F, Herget-Rosenthal S, Dorks M (2020) Drug interactions with oral anticoagulants in German nursing home residents: comparison between vitamin K antagonists and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants based on two nested case-control studies. Clin Res Cardiol 109:465–475

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Haeusler KG, Groschel K, Kohrmann M et al (2018) Expert opinion paper on atrial fibrillation detection after ischemic stroke. Clin Res Cardiol 107:871–880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kumagai T, Matsuura Y, Yamamoto T, Ugawa Y, Fukushima T (2014) Risk factors for left atrial thrombus from transesophageal echocardiography findings in ischemic stroke patients. Fukushima J Med Sci 60:154–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Dieker W, Behnes M, Fastner C et al (2018) Impact of left atrial appendage morphology on thrombus formation after successful left atrial appendage occlusion: assessment with cardiac-computed-tomography. Sci Rep 8:1670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Jankajova M, Kubikova L, Valocik G et al (2019) Left atrial appendage strain rate is associated with documented thromboembolism in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Wien Klin Wochenschr 131:156–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ferner M, Wachtlin D, Konrad T et al (2016) Rationale and design of the RE-LATED AF–AFNET 7 trial: REsolution of Left atrial-appendage thrombus-effects of dabigatran in patients with atrial fibrillation. Clin Res Cardiol 105:29–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Jaber WA, Prior DL, Thamilarasan M et al (2000) Efficacy of anticoagulation in resolving left atrial and left atrial appendage thrombi: a transesophageal echocardiographic study. Am Heart J 140:150–156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Niku AD, Shiota T, Siegel RJ, Rader F (2019) Prevalence and resolution of left atrial thrombus in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and flutter with oral anticoagulation. Am J Cardiol 123:63–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Koziel M, Al-Saady N, Hjortshoj SP, Goudev A, Huber K, Cohen A, Lip GYH (2020) Edoxaban versus warfarin in vitamin K antagonist experienced and naive patients from the edoxaban versus warfarin in subjects undergoing cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (ENSURE-AF) randomised trial. Clin Res Cardiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-019-01594-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Ke HH, He Y, Lv XW, Zhang EH, Wei Z, Li JY (2019) Efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban on the resolution of left atrial/left atrial appendage thrombus in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients. J Thromb Thrombolysis 48:270–276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Sedaghat.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nelles, D., Lambers, M., Schafigh, M. et al. Clinical outcomes and thrombus resolution in patients with solid left atrial appendage thrombi: results of a single-center real-world registry. Clin Res Cardiol 110, 72–83 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-020-01651-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-020-01651-8

Keywords

Navigation