Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prognostic impact of cancer history in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clinical Research in Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The benefit of TAVI in cancer patients is currently unclear.

Objectives

The purpose of this study is to investigate prognostic impact of cancer status (active cancer or previous cancer) in severe aortic stenosis (AS) patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

Methods

Consecutive TAVI patients in the Heart Center Bonn were enrolled and we stratified the patients into three groups: current cancer (active cancer), non-current cancer (previous cancer), or no cancer. The primary outcome was all-cause death within a 5-year follow-up. We evaluated mean aortic pressure gradient (mPG) values following TAVI (baseline mPG) and at the final follow-up (follow-up mPG).

Results

In total, 1568 TAVI patients were eligible and 298 patients (19.0%) had active or previous cancer. At the 5-year follow-up, cancer patients had a significantly worse prognosis than non-cancer patients (log rank, P < 0.001). In a multivariable analysis, previous cancer was a significant predictor for 5-year mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.56; P < 0.001). Estimated mortality rates at 5-year follow-up rates among active cancer, previous cancer, and non-cancer were 84.0%, 65.8%, and 50.2% (long-rank P < 0.001), respectively. The hazard ratios of active cancer and previous cancer for 5-year mortality were 2.79 (P < 0.001) and 1.38 (P = 0.019) compared to non-cancer patients. We found significantly higher mPG during follow-up than at baseline in cancer patients (follow-up 8.10 vs baseline 7.40 mmHg; Wilcoxon P = 0.012).

Conclusions

Active, and also previous, cancer status are associated with less beneficial long-term prognosis in TAVI patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Collaborators. GCoD (2016) Global, regional, and national age-sex specific mortality for 264 causes of death, 1980–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet 390:1151–1210

    Google Scholar 

  2. Koene RJ, Prizment AE, Blaes A, Konety SH (2016) Shared risk factors in cardiovascular disease and cancer. Circulation 133:1104–1114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Masoudkabir F, Sarrafzadegan N, Gotay C, Ignaszewski A, Krahn AD, Davis MK, Franco C, Mani A (2017) Cardiovascular disease and cancer: evidence for shared disease pathways and pharmacologic prevention. Atherosclerosis 263:343–351

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tabata N, Sueta D, Yamamoto E, Takashio S, Arima Y, Araki S, Yamanaga K, Ishii M, Sakamoto K, Kanazawa H, Fujisue K, Hanatani S, Soejima H, Hokimoto S, Izumiya Y, Kojima S, Yamabe H, Kaikita K, Tsujita K (2018) Outcome of current and history of cancer on the risk of cardiovascular events following percutaneous coronary intervention: a Kumamoto University Malignancy and Atherosclerosis (KUMA) study. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes 4:290–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tourmousoglou CE, Apostolakis E, Dougenis D (2014) Simultaneous occurrence of coronary artery disease and lung cancer: what is the best surgical treatment strategy? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 19:673–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kreatsoulas C, Anand SS, Subramanian SV (2014) An emerging double burden of disease: the prevalence of individuals with cardiovascular disease and cancer. J Intern Med 275:494–505

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rodes-Cabau J (2011) Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: current and future approaches. Nat Rev Cardiol 9:15–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mack MJ, Leon MB, Smith CR, Miller DC, Moses JW, Tuzcu EM, Webb JG, Douglas PS, Anderson WN, Blackstone EH, Kodali SK, Makkar RR, Fontana GP, Kapadia S, Bavaria J, Hahn RT, Thourani VH, Babaliaros V, Pichard A, Herrmann HC, Brown DL, Williams M, Akin J, Davidson MJ, Svensson LG (2015) 5-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement or surgical aortic valve replacement for high surgical risk patients with aortic stenosis (PARTNER 1): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 385:2477–2484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hofer F, Hengstenberg C, Goliasch G, Grygier M, Mascherbauer J, Siller-Matula JM (2019) Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low-risk patients: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Clin Res Cardiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-019-01571-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nguyen V, Michel M, Eltchaninoff H, Gilard M, Dindorf C, Iung B, Mossialos E, Cribier A, Vahanian A, Chevreul K, Messika-Zeitoun D (2018) Implementation of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in France. J Am Coll Cardiol 71:1614–1627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Frank D, Abdel-Wahab M, Gilard M, Digne F, Souteyrand G, Caussin C, Collart F, Letocart V, Wohrle J, Kuhn C, Hovorka T, Baumgartner H (2019) Characteristics and outcomes of patients ≤ 75 years who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation: insights from the SOURCE 3 Registry. Clin Res Cardiol 108:763–771

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kataruka A, Otto CM (2018) Valve durability after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Thorac Dis 10:S3629–S3636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bavaria JE, Szeto WY, Roche LA, Walsh EK, Buckley-Blaskovich V, Solometo LP, Burtch KE, Desai ND, Herrmann HC (2011) The progression of a transcatheter aortic valve program: a decision analysis of more than 680 patient referrals. Ann Thorac Surg 92:2072–2076 (discussion 2076–2077)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Landes U, Iakobishvili Z, Vronsky D, Zusman O, Barsheshet A, Jaffe R, Jubran A, Yoon SH, Makkar RR, Taramasso M, Russo M, Maisano F, Sinning JM, Shamekhi J, Biasco L, Pedrazzini G, Moccetti M, Latib A, Pagnesi M, Colombo A, Tamburino C, Arrigo P, Windecker S, Pilgrim T, Tchetche D, De Biase C, Guerrero M, Iftikhar O, Bosmans J, Bedzra E, Dvir D, Mylotte D, Sievert H, Watanabe Y, Sondergaard L, Dagnegard H, Codner P, Kodali S, Leon M, Kornowski R (2019) Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in oncology patients with severe aortic stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 12:78–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tabata N, Sueta D, Yamamoto E, Takashio S, Arima Y, Araki S, Yamanaga K, Ishii M, Sakamoto K, Kanazawa H, Fujisue K, Hanatani S, Soejima H, Hokimoto S, Izumiya Y, Kojima S, Yamabe H, Kaikita K, Matsui K, Tsujita K (2019) A retrospective study of arterial stiffness and subsequent clinical outcomes in cancer patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. J Hypertens 37:754–764

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, De Bonis M, Hamm C, Holm PJ, Iung B, Lancellotti P, Lansac E, Rodriguez Munoz D, Rosenhek R, Sjogren J, Tornos Mas P, Vahanian A, Walther T, Wendler O, Windecker S, Zamorano JL (2017) 2017 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 38:2739–2791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kapadia SR, Leon MB, Makkar RR, Tuzcu EM, Svensson LG, Kodali S, Webb JG, Mack MJ, Douglas PS, Thourani VH, Babaliaros VC, Herrmann HC, Szeto WY, Pichard AD, Williams MR, Fontana GP, Miller DC, Anderson WN, Akin JJ, Davidson MJ, Smith CR (2015) 5-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared with standard treatment for patients with inoperable aortic stenosis (PARTNER 1): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 385:2485–2491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bach DS, Cimino N, Deeb GM (2007) Unoperated patients with severe aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 50:2018–2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Samuels LE, Kaufman MS, Morris RJ, Styler M, Brockman SK (1999) Open heart surgery in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Leuk Res 23:71–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Eichler S, Salzwedel A, Harnath A, Butter C, Wegscheider K, Chiorean M, Voller H, Reibis R (2018) Nutrition and mobility predict all-cause mortality in patients 12 months after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Clin Res Cardiol 107:304–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee K, Ahn JM, Kang DY, Ko E, Kwon O, Lee PH, Lee SW, Kim DH, Kim HJ, Kim JB, Choo SJ, Park DW, Park SJ (2020) Nutritional status and risk of all-cause mortality in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement assessment using the geriatric nutritional risk index and the controlling nutritional status score. Clin Res Cardiol 109(2):161–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ridker PM, MacFadyen JG, Thuren T, Everett BM, Libby P, Glynn RJ (2017) Effect of interleukin-1beta inhibition with canakinumab on incident lung cancer in patients with atherosclerosis: exploratory results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 390:1833–1842

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tabata N, Al-Kassou B, Sugiura A, Shamekhi J, Treede H, Ishii M, Tsujita K, Werner N, Grube E, Nickenig G, Sinning JM (2019) Predictive value of the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in cancer patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardio Oncol 1:159–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dipasco PJ, Misra S, Koniaris LG, Moffat FL Jr (2011) Thrombophilic state in cancer, part I: biology, incidence, and risk factors. J Surg Oncol 104:316–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Khorana AA, Francis CW, Culakova E, Kuderer NM, Lyman GH (2007) Thromboembolism is a leading cause of death in cancer patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy. J Thromb Haemost 5:632–634

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Chakravarty T, Sondergaard L, Friedman J, De Backer O, Berman D, Kofoed KF, Jilaihawi H, Shiota T, Abramowitz Y, Jorgensen TH, Rami T, Israr S, Fontana G, de Knegt M, Fuchs A, Lyden P, Trento A, Bhatt DL, Leon MB, Makkar RR (2017) Subclinical leaflet thrombosis in surgical and transcatheter bioprosthetic aortic valves: an observational study. Lancet 389:2383–2392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sondergaard L, De Backer O, Kofoed KF, Jilaihawi H, Fuchs A, Chakravarty T, Kashif M, Kazuno Y, Kawamori H, Maeno Y, Bieliauskas G, Guo H, Stone GW, Makkar R (2017) Natural history of subclinical leaflet thrombosis affecting motion in bioprosthetic aortic valves. Eur Heart J 38:2201–2207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Vollema EM, Kong WKF, Katsanos S, Kamperidis V, van Rosendael PJ, van der Kley F, de Weger A, Ajmone N, Marsan N, Delgado V, Bax JJ (2017) Transcatheter aortic valve thrombosis: the relation between hypo-attenuated leaflet thickening, abnormal valve haemodynamics, and stroke. Eur Heart J 38:1207–1217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hein M, Minners J, Jander N, Breitbart P, Stratz C, Pache G, Neumann FJ, Ruile P (2019) Haemodynamic prosthetic valve performance in patients with early leaflet thrombosis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Clin Res Cardiol 108:1017–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Ms. Meghan Campbell, a scientific coordinator in the Heart Center Bonn, for proofreading English.

Funding

Dr. Tabata was supported financially in part by the Fellowship of Astellas Foundation for Research on Metabolic Disorders and Uehara Memorial Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan-Malte Sinning.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

Drs. Sinning, Werner, and Nickenig have received speaker honoraria and research grants from Abbott, Abiomed, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr. Tsujita has received grants from Abbott Vascular Japan, Medtronic Japan, and Boston Scientific Japan. The other authors report no conflicts of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

392_2020_1615_MOESM1_ESM.tiff

Supplementary Figure 1. Distribution of cancers in total subjects. The distribution of cancer diseases showed that prostate, breast, colorectal, leukemia, and bladder cancer had the highest prevalence (TIFF 26369 kb)

392_2020_1615_MOESM2_ESM.tiff

Supplementary Figure 2. Additional study flowchart. Cancer patients and non-cancer patients were matched by a propensity score matching method and were examined for baseline and follow-up mean pressure gradients. F.U., follow-up; TTE, transthoracic echocardiography (TIFF 26369 kb)

Supplementary file3 (DOCX 39 kb)

Supplementary file4 (DOCX 39 kb)

Supplementary file5 (DOCX 41 kb)

Supplementary file6 (DOCX 40 kb)

Supplementary file7 (DOCX 29 kb)

Supplementary file8 (DOCX 28 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tabata, N., Al-Kassou, B., Sugiura, A. et al. Prognostic impact of cancer history in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Clin Res Cardiol 109, 1243–1250 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-020-01615-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-020-01615-y

Keywords

Navigation