Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 395, Issue 10221, 1–7 February 2020, Pages 371-383
The Lancet

Therapeutics
Intersection of biology and therapeutics: type 2 targeted therapeutics for adult asthma

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)33005-3Get rights and content

Summary

Asthma is a disease of reversible airflow obstruction characterised clinically by wheezing, shortness of breath, and coughing. Increases in airway type 2 cytokine activity, including interleukin-4 (IL-4), IL-5, and IL-13, are now established biological mechanisms in asthma. Inhaled corticosteroids have been the foundation for asthma treatment, in a large part because they decrease airway type 2 inflammation. However, inhaled or systemic corticosteroids are ineffective treatments in many patients with asthma and few treatment options exist for patients with steroid resistant asthma. Although mechanisms for corticosteroid refractory asthma are likely to be numerous, the development of a new class of biologic agents that target airway type 2 inflammation has provided a new model for treating some patients with corticosteroid refractory asthma. The objective of this Therapeutic paper is to summarise the new type 2 therapeutics, with an emphasis on the biological rationale and clinical efficacy of this new class of asthma therapeutics.

Introduction

Asthma is a chronic airway disease that inflicts between 300 million and 400 million people worldwide.1 A diagnosis of asthma requires verifying the presence of reversible airflow obstruction,2 which is accomplished by showing either airflow limitation that improves following bronchodilator administration or worsening airflow obstruction in the setting of airway provocation.3 The disease is characterised by coughing, shortness of breath, chest tightness, and wheezing.4 These symptoms result from impaired airway inflammatory responses that cause mucus hypersecretion, bronchial hyper-responsiveness, and activation of airway granulocytes.5 Mouse models of asthma were used to identify pivotal roles for the cytokines interleukin-4 (IL-4), IL-5, and IL-13 in driving the pathophysiological features of allergic asthma.6, 7, 8, 9 Because T-helper-2 (Th2) cells were believed to be the principle source of these signalling molecules they were originally named Th2 cytokines,10 but other cells, including innate lymphocytes, can also produce these proteins, and the research community has since migrated to the broader term of type 2 (or T2) cytokines. Confirming the pathological role of these factors in human asthma would take nearly 25 years as initial human trials of targeted therapies returned negative results.11, 12, 13 In fact, establishing the efficacy of these cytokines for asthma in humans required a convergence of two concepts. First, that asthma was a complex heterogeneous disease, and second, that biologic therapies needed to target the population of asthma patients with elevated type 2 cytokine activity in their airways.14, 15, 16

Section snippets

Type 2-high asthma

Inspired by observations that allergic inflammation in mice was driven by Th2 cytokine activity8, 9 and that these cytokines were measured at high concentrations in the lungs of patients with asthma,17, 18, 19, 20 multiple monoclonal antibodies were developed to inhibit type 2 inflammation. Unfortunately, the first clinical trials testing the inhibition of IL-5 (and IL-4) with these antibodies were profoundly disappointing.11, 12, 13 Proving the efficacy of type 2 cytokine inhibition would have

Omalizumab

Although patients and asthma physicians are excited about the type 2-targeted biologics, the first approved biologic for asthma (omalizumab) was infact targeted to immunoglobulin E (IgE). Multiple reviews have discussed in detail the use of omalizumab as a treatment for asthma.35, 36 Free or circulating IgE binds to high-affinity IgE receptors (FcɛRI) expressed on the surface of basophils and mast cells, leading to their cellular activation. Omalizumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds to

Eosinophils and IL-5 inhibition

Eosinophils are granulocytes that release a variety of proinflammatory mediators, including proinflammatory cytokines following activation, major basic protein, eosinophil peroxidase, eosinophil cationic protein, eosinophil-derived neurotoxin, and galactin-10 or Charcot-Leyden crystals (figure 1).7 Some patients with asthma show increases in airway eosinophilia, which has been appreciated for over 100 years.45, 46 This observation prompted a considerable amount of research focused on

Adverse effects of IL-5 inhibition

The most severe adverse reaction observed with the IL-5 inhibitors was anaphylaxis. This reaction was more common with the intravenously administered reslizumab than the other IL-5 antagonists and occurred in 0·3% of patients61—the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has given the drug a black box warning in this regard (table 2). This frequency is similar to that seen with the subcutaneous anti-IgE monoclonal antibody (omalizumab).62 Hypersensitivity reactions were slightly less frequent

IL-4RA inhibition

The cytokines, IL-4 and IL-13, are complementary both in their biologic roles and in their signalling machinery. Namely, the primary receptor for IL-4 is IL-4RA, which upon binding with IL-4, complexes with the common γ-chain (γc) to signal via intracellular JAK1 or JAK3 pathways (type 1 receptor).71 IL-13 also uses the IL-4RA receptor through a heterodimerisation with IL-13RA1 that signals via JAK1, JAK2, and TYK2 (type 2 receptor).71, 72 Thus, blocking IL-4RA inhibits the primary signalling

Adverse effects of IL-4RA inhibition

Dupilumab is relatively well tolerated and the most common adverse events are injection site reactions. In addition, treatment with dupilumab increased the frequency of a poorly characterised conjunctivitis (about 10%) in the atopic dermatitis studies, an effect not yet seen in the asthma trials.92 As with the anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibodies, there was a reported increase in herpes-related events, and IL-4RA inhibition also increased blood eosinophil counts after treatment, peaking at 1–2

Comparing clinical efficacy and differing trial designs of phase 3 trials

Comparing clinical efficacy between medications requires a randomised blinded trial design directly testing the medications in a head-to-head analysis. To our knowledge, no such trial has been done and would probably require large numbers of patients. Furthermore, because study populations and analysis plans differed greatly between the type 2 biologic clinical trials, directly comparing the treatment effect sizes for each drug is difficult.94 For example, the threshold to discriminate

Fevipiprant

Although it is not a monoclonal antibody, fevipiprant is an oral medication that blocks the binding of prostaglandin D2 to its receptor, the chemoattractant receptor-homologous molecule expressed on Th2 cells (CRTH2 or PTGDR2). As the name implies, this receptor is commonly expressed on Th2 cells, and would therefore be expected to work in patients with type 2-high asthma. However, clinical trials of fevipiprant have shown mixed results, with the most consistent finding showing a small

Biomarkers of treatment response

Blood eosinophil counts are a predictor of response for each of the type 2 biologic agents.54, 90, 97, 98 Patients with blood eosinophil counts of 300 cells per μL or higher have approximately a 50% reduction in asthma exacerbation when treated with either anti-IL-5 or anti-IL-4RA therapies, whereas the clinical benefit in patients with blood eosinophil counts of less than 300 cells per μL is considerably reduced.90, 98 However, blood eosinophilia does not uniformly predict treatment response,

Indications for treatment

The American Thoracic Society and the European Respiratory Society's definition of severe asthma is the presence of poor asthma control despite maximal treatment with high doses of inhaled corticosteroids and one additional controller medication.42, 103 The relatively small percentage of patients with severe asthma (5–10%) contributes to the majority of asthma-associated health-care costs.104 The cost of health care for each patient helps to justify the high expense of these new biologic

New therapies for severe non-eosinophilic or type 2-low asthma

Treatment options for patients with type 2-low severe asthma remain limited, and aggressive efforts to identify non-type 2 treatment options remain scarce. Multiple cytokines with roles that overlap with the prototypical type 2 cytokines have been tested in asthma with mixed results. An early phase 2B trial with an inhibitor of the epithelial cell-derived cytokine thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) have been positive, with tezepelumab decreasing asthma exacerbation by 60–70%.106 By contrast,

Future directions and remaining controversies

Although the results of the clinical trials do not provide evidence that inhibition of IL-5 is superior or inferior to inhibiting IL-4RA, there are clues that heterogeneity in type 2 inflammatory-immune processes might eventually define pathobiological subgroups of patients with type 2 asthma who respond better to inhibition of one pathway versus the other. For example, airway eosinophilia can be induced by activation of Th2 cells or type 2 innate lymphoid cells. Type 2 innate lymphoid cells

Conclusion

The emergence of type 2 biologics for the treatment of severe asthma is a welcomed and much needed advance in the management of patients with asthma. Although a cure for asthma remains elusive, many patients with severe asthma show a robust and sustained response to this new class of medication. Critical needs remain regarding better biomarkers to identify patients that are most likely to respond to these drugs and a deeper understanding for how airway type 2 inflammation develops in airway

Search strategy and selection criteria

We evaluated the biological target and clinical efficacy of type 2 monoclonal antibodies in asthma. References for this Review were identified through searches of PubMed for articles published between Jan 1, 1950, and Oct 31, 2019 (last searched Nov 7, 2019). The search terms “Asthma/drug therapy” [MeSH], “Antibodies, monoclonal/therapeutic use” [MeSH], “Clinical Trial” [publication type], “Eosinophilia/drug therapy” [MeSH], “Asthma/immunology” [MeSH], “Th2 Cells/immunology” [MeSH], and “asthma

References (134)

  • ER Bleecker et al.

    Efficacy and safety of benralizumab for patients with severe asthma uncontrolled with high-dosage inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β2-agonists (SIROCCO): a randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial

    Lancet

    (2016)
  • WW Busse et al.

    Long-term safety and efficacy of benralizumab in patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma: 1-year results from the BORA phase 3 extension trial

    Lancet Respir Med

    (2019)
  • S Khatri et al.

    Assessment of the long-term safety of mepolizumab and durability of clinical response in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma

    J Allergy Clin Immunol

    (2019)
  • HL Kim et al.

    Omalizumab: practical considerations regarding the risk of anaphylaxis

    Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol

    (2010)
  • L Huang et al.

    Eosinophils in helminth infection: defenders and dupes

    Trends Parasitol

    (2016)
  • L Harbaum et al.

    Peritumoral eosinophils predict recurrence in colorectal cancer

    Mod Pathol

    (2015)
  • R Sehmi et al.

    Benralizumab attenuates airway eosinophilia in prednisone-dependent asthma

    J Allergy Clin Immunol

    (2018)
  • M Laviolette et al.

    Effects of benralizumab on airway eosinophils in asthmatic patients with sputum eosinophilia

    J Allergy Clin Immunol

    (2013)
  • BN Lambrecht et al.

    The cytokines of asthma

    Immunity

    (2019)
  • NA Hanania et al.

    Efficacy and safety of lebrikizumab in patients with uncontrolled asthma (LAVOLTA I and LAVOLTA II): replicate, phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials

    Lancet Respir Med

    (2016)
  • P Korenblat et al.

    Efficacy and safety of lebrikizumab in adult patients with mild-to-moderate asthma not receiving inhaled corticosteroids

    Respir Med

    (2018)
  • CE Brightling et al.

    Efficacy and safety of tralokinumab in patients with severe uncontrolled asthma: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial

    Lancet Respir Med

    (2015)
  • RA Panettieri et al.

    Tralokinumab for severe, uncontrolled asthma (STRATOS 1 and STRATOS 2): two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 clinical trials

    Lancet Respir Med

    (2018)
  • RJ Russell et al.

    Effect of tralokinumab, an interleukin-13 neutralising monoclonal antibody, on eosinophilic airway inflammation in uncontrolled moderate-to-severe asthma (MESOS): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial

    Lancet Respir Med

    (2018)
  • S Wenzel et al.

    Effect of an interleukin-4 variant on late phase asthmatic response to allergen challenge in asthmatic patients: results of two phase 2a studies

    Lancet

    (2007)
  • S Wenzel et al.

    Dupilumab efficacy and safety in adults with uncontrolled persistent asthma despite use of medium-to-high-dose inhaled corticosteroids plus a long-acting β2 agonist: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled pivotal phase 2b dose-ranging trial

    Lancet

    (2016)
  • W Busse et al.

    Anti-IL-5 treatments in patients with severe asthma by blood eosinophil thresholds: indirect treatment comparison

    J Allergy Clin Immunol

    (2019)
  • S Gonem et al.

    Fevipiprant, a prostaglandin D2 receptor 2 antagonist, in patients with persistent eosinophilic asthma: a single-centre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial

    Lancet Respir Med

    (2016)
  • HG Ortega et al.

    Severe eosinophilic asthma treated with mepolizumab stratified by baseline eosinophil thresholds: a secondary analysis of the DREAM and MENSA studies

    Lancet Respir Med

    (2016)
  • T To et al.

    Global asthma prevalence in adults: findings from the cross-sectional world health survey

    BMC Public Health

    (2012)
  • SD Aaron et al.

    Reevaluation of diagnosis in adults with physician-diagnosed asthma

    JAMA

    (2017)
  • JV Fahy

    Type 2 inflammation in asthma—present in most, absent in many

    Nat Rev Immunol

    (2015)
  • SP Hogan et al.

    Interleukin-5 and eosinophils induce airway damage and bronchial hyperreactivity during allergic airway inflammation in BALB/c mice

    Immunol Cell Biol

    (1997)
  • G Grünig et al.

    Requirement for IL-13 independently of IL-4 in experimental asthma

    Science

    (1998)
  • G Brusselle et al.

    Allergen-induced airway inflammation and bronchial responsiveness in wild-type and interleukin-4-deficient mice

    Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol

    (1995)
  • DS Robinson et al.

    Predominant TH2-like bronchoalveolar T-lymphocyte population in atopic asthma

    N Engl J Med

    (1992)
  • P Flood-Page et al.

    A study to evaluate safety and efficacy of mepolizumab in patients with moderate persistent asthma

    Am J Respir Crit Care Med

    (2007)
  • J Corren et al.

    A randomized, controlled, phase 2 study of AMG 317, an IL-4Ralpha antagonist, in patients with asthma

    Am J Respir Crit Care Med

    (2010)
  • PG Woodruff et al.

    T-helper type 2-driven inflammation defines major subphenotypes of asthma

    Am J Respir Crit Care Med

    (2009)
  • M Berry et al.

    Pathological features and inhaled corticosteroid response of eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic asthma

    Thorax

    (2007)
  • SE Wenzel et al.

    Evidence that severe asthma can be divided pathologically into two inflammatory subtypes with distinct physiologic and clinical characteristics

    Am J Respir Crit Care Med

    (1999)
  • TC Kotsimbos et al.

    Interleukin-13 and interleukin-4 are coexpressed in atopic asthma

    Proc Assoc Am Physicians

    (1996)
  • KJ Bodey et al.

    Cytokine profiles of BAL T cells and T-cell clones obtained from human asthmatic airways after local allergen challenge

    Allergy

    (1999)
  • PG Woodruff et al.

    Genome-wide profiling identifies epithelial cell genes associated with asthma and with treatment response to corticosteroids

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (2007)
  • M Humbert et al.

    IL-4 and IL-5 mRNA and protein in bronchial biopsies from patients with atopic and nonatopic asthma: evidence against “intrinsic” asthma being a distinct immunopathologic entity

    Am J Respir Crit Care Med

    (1996)
  • ED Gordon et al.

    Alternative splicing of interleukin-33 and type 2 inflammation in asthma

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (2016)
  • MC Peters et al.

    A transcriptomic method to determine airway immune dysfunction in T2-high and T2-low asthma

    Am J Respir Crit Care Med

    (2019)
  • JC Nussbaum et al.

    Type 2 innate lymphoid cells control eosinophil homeostasis

    Nature

    (2013)
  • MC Peters et al.

    Measures of gene expression in sputum cells can identify TH2-high and TH2-low subtypes of asthma

    J Allergy Clin Immunol

    (2014)
  • NR Bhakta et al.

    A qPCR-based metric of Th2 airway inflammation in asthma

    Clin Transl Allergy

    (2013)
  • Cited by (104)

    • Interleukin-4 as a therapeutic target

      2023, Pharmacology and Therapeutics
    • Leptin-producing monocytes in the airway submucosa may contribute to asthma pathogenesis

      2023, Respiratory Investigation
      Citation Excerpt :

      Asthma is one of the most common chronic respiratory diseases, characterized by reversible airway obstruction and increased airway hypersensitivity caused by airway inflammation [1].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text