Clinical Investigation
Predicting Heart Failure Risk from Echocardiograms of Coronary Artery Disease Patients
Association of Machine Learning–Derived Phenogroupings of Echocardiographic Variables with Heart Failure in Stable Coronary Artery Disease: The Heart and Soul Study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2019.09.010Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Echocardiographic phenogroups in stable CAD can be derived with a clustering algorithm.

  • Patients with stable CAD had differential associations with HF hospitalization.

  • The phenogroups independently predicted HF hospitalizations equally as well as HFI.

Background

Many individual echocardiographic variables have been associated with heart failure (HF) in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD), but their combined utility for prediction has not been well studied.

Methods

Unsupervised model-based cluster analysis was performed by researchers blinded to the study outcome in 1,000 patients with stable CAD on 15 transthoracic echocardiographic variables. We evaluated associations of cluster membership with HF hospitalization using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.

Results

The echo-derived clusters partitioned subjects into four phenogroupings: phenogroup 1 (n = 85) had the highest levels, phenogroups 2 (n = 314) and 3 (n = 205) displayed intermediate levels, and phenogroup 4 (n = 396) had the lowest levels of cardiopulmonary structural and functional abnormalities. Over 7.1 ± 3.2 years of follow-up, there were 198 HF hospitalizations. After multivariable adjustment for traditional cardiovascular risk factors, phenogroup 1 was associated with a nearly fivefold increased risk (hazard ratio [HR] = 4.8; 95% CI, 2.4-9.5), phenogroup 2 was associated with a nearly threefold increased risk (HR = 2.7; 95% CI, 1.4-5.0), and phenogroup 3 was associated with a nearly twofold increased risk (HR = 1.9; 95% CI, 1.0-3.8) of HF hospitalization, relative to phenogroup 4.

Conclusions

Transthoracic echocardiographic variables can be used to classify stable CAD patients into separate phenogroupings that differentiate cardiopulmonary structural and functional abnormalities and can predict HF hospitalization, independent of traditional cardiovascular risk factors.

Section snippets

Methods

The Heart and Soul Study is a prospective cohort study evaluating the impact of psychosocial factors on cardiovascular outcomes. The study methods have been previously described in detail.10 Participants were enrolled between 2000 and 2002 from two veterans' affairs hospitals, an academic medical center, and nine public health clinics in the San Francisco area. All participants had CAD defined by either a history of myocardial infarction, angiographic evidence of ≥50% stenosis in a coronary

Construction of Echocardiographic Phenogroupings

We identified four distinct echocardiographic phenogroups using an unsupervised (i.e., agnostic of outcomes) automated clustering method. We started with generating Spearman correlations among the 15 echocardiographic variables. In unadjusted analysis, we found moderately strong correlations (r ≥ 0.5) among LVEDVI, LVESVI, LVEF, and WMSI and between VTILVOT and VTIRVOT (Figure 1); all other correlations were moderate (r < 0.5) to weak (r < 0.3). The strongest correlation was between LVEDVI and

Discussion

In this cohort of 1,000 participants with stable CAD, we found that automated model-based unsupervised clustering based on 15 echocardiographic measures identifies four distinct phenogroupings, which successfully partition subjects into categories of risk of HF hospitalization. Our group had previously used multivariable Cox proportional hazard models to select five of these 15 echocardiographic measures to create an HFI that independently predicted HF hospitalizations in the same cohort.6 We

Conclusion

Automated unsupervised clustering of echocardiographic measures successfully partitioned a population with stable CAD into phenogroupings of risk for HF hospitalization. This machine learning algorithm performed as well as the HFI, derived previously in the same cohort using traditional scalar methods. This suggests the possibility that automated machine learning algorithms could be applied to echocardiographic measurements to derive phenogroupings by being incorporated into echocardiographic

References (29)

Cited by (13)

  • Cardiac Structure and Function Phenogroups and Risk of Incident Heart Failure (from the Multi-ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis)

    2023, American Journal of Cardiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Furthermore, some studies found significant associations between phenogroup classes and adverse outcomes such as sudden death or death from HF, all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalization, and HF hospitalization.22–24 Other statistical methods have also been used for phenogroup identification.10,22–25 In a study of 397 patients with HFpEF, Shah et al used unbiased hierarchical cluster analysis and penalized model-based clustering to identify 3 distinct phenogroups that differed in clinical characteristics, cardiac structure and function, and outcomes.10

  • Artificial intelligence in heart failure and transplant

    2023, Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Practice: How AI Technologies Impact Medical Research and Clinics
  • Artificial intelligence applied to support medical decisions for the automatic analysis of echocardiogram images: A systematic review

    2021, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    The RF model was better, with an AUC of 0.881 for LVDD and 0.785 for LVH. Mishra et al. [111] highlighted that many individual echocardiographic variables are associated with patients with CAD. However, they have not been combined in prediction models.

  • Machine Learning in Cardiac Imaging: Exploring the Art of Cluster Analysis

    2021, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
View all citing articles on Scopus

Dr. Tison received support from the National Institutes of Health (NHLBI K23HL135274). The Heart and Soul Study was supported by grants from the Department of Veterans Affairs, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL079235), the American Federation for Aging Research, and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

Conflicts of Interest: None

Dr. Mishra acted as the corresponding author during the submission of this manuscript, but passed away prior to the article’s publication.

View full text