Doubly Robust Estimation of Causal Effect: Upping the Odds of Getting the Right Answers

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Jan;13(1):e006065. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.006065. Epub 2019 Dec 31.

Abstract

Propensity score-based methods or multiple regressions of the outcome are often used for confounding adjustment in analysis of observational studies. In either approach, a model is needed: A model describing the relationship between the treatment assignment and covariates in the propensity score-based method or a model for the outcome and covariates in the multiple regressions. The 2 models are usually unknown to the investigators and must be estimated. The correct model specification, therefore, is essential for the validity of the final causal estimate. We describe in this article a doubly robust estimator which combines both models propitiously to offer analysts 2 chances for obtaining a valid causal estimate and demonstrate its use through a data set from the Lindner Center Study.

Keywords: health status; odds ratio; propensity score; research; risk.

MeSH terms

  • Abciximab / therapeutic use
  • Causality*
  • Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic
  • Coronary Artery Disease / therapy
  • Humans
  • Models, Statistical*
  • Multivariate Analysis
  • Observational Studies as Topic / statistics & numerical data*
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention / adverse effects
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention / instrumentation
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention / mortality
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors / therapeutic use
  • Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex / antagonists & inhibitors
  • Propensity Score
  • Risk Assessment
  • Risk Factors
  • Stents
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
  • Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex
  • Abciximab