Elsevier

JACC: Heart Failure

Volume 7, Issue 12, December 2019, Pages 1069-1078
JACC: Heart Failure

Special Issue: Heart Failure in the Elderly
Clinical Research
Clinical Outcomes After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation in Older Adults: An INTERMACS Analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchf.2019.10.004Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

Abstract

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to examine outcomes after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation in older adults (>75 years of age).

Background

An aging heart failure population together with improvements in mechanical circulatory support (MCS) technology have led to increasing LVAD implantations in older adults. However, data presenting age-specific outcomes are limited.

Methods

Adult patients in the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) who required durable MCS between 2008 and 2017 were included. Patients were stratified by 4 age groups: <55 years of age, 55 to 64 years of age, and >75 years of age. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were used to assess post-LVAD outcomes, with log-rank testing used to compare groups. Univariate and multivariate cox proportional hazard regression models were used to determine predictors of survival and complications.

Results

A total of 20,939 individuals received an LVAD during the study period: 7,743 (37.0%) were <55 years of age, 6,755 (32.3%) were 55 to 64 years of age, 5,418 (25.9%) were 65 to 74 years of age, and 1,023 (4.9%) were ≥75 years of age or older. After multivariate adjustment, adults ≥75 years of age had increased mortality post-LVAD implantation. Elderly patients with LVADs had a higher incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding but lower rates of device thrombosis. Compared to 84.5% of patients <55 years of age who were discharged home, only 46.8% of adults ≥75 years of age were discharged home following implantation (p < 0.001). Use of a RVAD, serum albumin level, and 6-min walk test distances were identified as predictors of outcomes in the oldest cohort.

Conclusions

Despite careful selection of older adults for LVAD implantation, age remains a significant predictor of mortality. Higher bleeding and lower clotting risk in elderly patients with LVADs support the use of a less intense antithrombotic regimen in this unique population.

Key Words

age
elderly
geriatrics
heart failure
ventricular assist device

Abbreviations and Acronyms

6MWT
6-min walk test
BSA
body surface area
BMI
body mass index
GI
gastrointestinal
HF
heart failure
INTERMACS
Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support
LVAD
left ventricular assist device
RVAD
right ventricular assist device

Cited by (0)

Dr. Desai is a consultant for Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, and Relypsa. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Drs. Caraballo and DeFilippis contributed equally to this manuscript as co-first authors.

Drs. Ahmad and Topkara contributed equally to this manuscript as co-senior authors.