T2STIR preparation for single-shot cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial edema imaging

J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2019 Nov 21;21(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12968-019-0583-y.

Abstract

Background: Myocardial edema in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is commonly imaged using dark-blood short tau inversion recovery turbo spin echo (STIR-TSE) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). The technique is sensitive to cardiac motion and coil sensitivity variation, leading to myocardial signal nonuniformity and impeding reliable depiction of edematous tissues. T2-prepared balanced steady state free precession (T2p-bSSFP) imaging has been proposed, but its contrast is low, and averaging is commonly needed. T2 mapping is useful but requires a long scan time and breathholding. We propose here a single-shot magnetization prepared sequence that increases the contrast between edema and normal myocardium and apply it to myocardial edema imaging.

Methods: A magnetization preparation module (T2STIR) is designed to exploit the simultaneous elevation of T1 and T2 in edema to improve the depiction of edematous myocardium. The module tips magnetization down to the -z axis after T2 preparation. Transverse magnetization is sampled at the fat null point using bSSFP readout and allows for single-shot myocardial edema imaging. The sequence (T2STIR-bSSFP) was studied for its contrast behavior using simulation and phantoms. It was then evaluated on 7 healthy subjects and 7 AMI patients by comparing it to T2p-bSSFP and T2 mapping using the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and the contrast ratio as performance indices.

Results: In simulation and phantom studies, T2STIR-bSSFP had improved contrast between edema and normal myocardium compared with the other two edema imaging techniques. In patients, the CNR of T2STIR-bSSFP was higher than T2p-bSSFP (5.9 ± 2.6 vs. 2.8 ± 2.0, P < 0.05) but had no significant difference compared with that of the T2 map (T2 map: 6.6 ± 3.3 vs. 5.9 ± 2.6, P = 0.62). The contrast ratio of T2STIR-bSSFP (2.4 ± 0.8) was higher than that of the T2 map (1.3 ± 0.1, P < 0.01) and T2p-bSSFP (1.4 ± 0.5, P < 0.05).

Conclusion: T2STIR-bSSFP has improved contrast between edematous and normal myocardium compared with commonly used bSSFP-based edema imaging techniques. T2STIR-bSSFP also differentiates between fat that was robustly suppressed and fluids around the heart. The technique is useful for single-shot edema imaging in AMI patients.

Keywords: Edema; Short tau inversion recovery; Single-shot imaging; T2STIR.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Case-Control Studies
  • Computer Simulation
  • Contrast Media / administration & dosage
  • Edema, Cardiac / diagnostic imaging*
  • Female
  • Gadolinium DTPA / administration & dosage
  • Humans
  • Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging* / instrumentation
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Models, Cardiovascular
  • Phantoms, Imaging
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Contrast Media
  • Gadolinium DTPA