Background: This study evaluates our 18-year experience of total arch replacement in the octogenarian and nonagenarian population.
Methods: Between October 1999 and March 2018, a total of 740 patients underwent total arch replacement at our institution. A total of 139 patients were aged 80 years or more (83.1 ± 2.8 years), and 601 patients were aged less than 80 years (66.9 ± 11.3 years). Early and late outcomes were compared between the groups.
Results: In the group aged 80 years or more, operative mortality occurred in 12 patients (8.6%) and significantly improved over time (P = .010). Operative mortality was significantly higher in the group aged 80 years or more (P = .033) when compared with the group aged less than 80 years (4.0%). Regarding postoperative complications, deep sternal wound infection, pneumonia, and tracheostomy occurred in significantly more patients in the group aged 80 years or more. In the group aged 80 years or more, there were 52 late deaths, with 4 aortic-related deaths. Overall survival was 55.4% ± 5.0% at 5 years and 32.2% ± 6.1% at 8 years. Multivariable Cox-hazard regression analysis demonstrated that chronic kidney disease, nonelective surgery, and concurrent procedures were significant risk factors for overall survival in the group aged 80 years or more. Cumulative incidence for reoperation was significantly lower in the group aged 80 years or more (8.7% at 5 years) compared with the group aged less than 80 years (14.2% at 5 years).
Conclusions: Total arch replacement was performed with an acceptable overall survival in octogenarians and nonagenarians, although operative mortality was higher than in younger patients. However, older patients had a lesser burden of reoperation compared with younger patients.
Keywords: aortic arch; aortic dissection; aortic operation.
Copyright © 2019 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.