Outcomes in cystic fibrosis lung transplant recipients infected with organisms labeled as pan-resistant: An ISHLT Registry‒based analysis

Background: The presence of pan-resistant organisms in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) potentially impacts mortality after lung transplant (LT). In this study we aimed to study LT mortality in CF patients with and without pan-resistant infection.

Methods: The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) Thoracic Transplant Registry was used to identify adults with CF, first-time, bilateral LT from 1991 to 2015. Extracted data included demographics, clinical characteristics, post-transplant outcomes, and mortality (infection-related, overall). Multivariate binary logistic regression models were created with 90-day and 1-year mortality as primary outcomes.

Results: Among 3,256 LT recipients with CF, 697 were labeled as having pan-resistant infection, the others were included as controls (n = 2,649). Pre-transplant, those labeled as pan-resistant were more likely to require ventilator support, have an infection requiring intravenous antibiotics, and have had ≥2 pneumonia episodes within 1 year. Ninety-day and 1-year mortality was similar between groups, but infection-related mortality at 90days (3.3% vs 1.88%, p = 0.01) and 1 year (6.6% vs 4.6%, p < 0.001) was higher in those labeled as pan-resistant. In multivariate analysis, presence of organisms labeled as pan-resistant was not associated with 90-day (odds ratio [OR] 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.93 to 2.42, p = 0.09) or 1-year mortality (OR 1.32, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.83, p = 0.097).

Conclusions: CF patients with pre-transplant infection from organisms labeled as pan-resistant had similar 90-day and 1-year mortality as those without. Despite increased infection-related mortality in these patients, it was not predictive of mortality in multivariate analysis. The higher occurrence of post-transplant infections in these patients warrants diligent follow-up. A multicenter cohort study will be required to validate the findings of our study.