Curriculum in Cardiology
Cardiovascular drugs that increase the risk of new-onset diabetes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2013.12.025Get rights and content

The prevalence of type 2 diabetes is increasing worldwide, and diabetes is a strong adverse prognostic factor among patients with cardiovascular (CV) disease. Four classes of drugs that are commonly used for CV risk reduction, statins, niacin, thiazide diuretics, and ß-blockers, have been shown to increase the risk of new-onset diabetes (NOD) by 9% to 43% in meta-analyses or large-scale clinical trials. Clinical predictors for drug-related NOD appear to be similar to the predictors that have been described for NOD unrelated to drugs: fasting blood glucose >100 mg/dL and features of the metabolic syndrome such as body mass index >30 kg/m2, serum triglycerides >150 mg/dL, and elevated blood pressure, among others. The mechanisms whereby these drugs increase the risk of NOD are incompletely understood, although different hypotheses have been suggested. Lifestyle intervention consisting of diet and exercise has been shown in multiple studies to reduce the risk of NOD by approximately 50%, with persistent benefit during long-term follow-up. In patients at high risk for NOD, niacin should be avoided, and for hypertension, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or even a ß1-selective blocker might be a better choice than a standard ß-blocker. For thiazide diuretics and particularly statins, benefit in terms of CV event reduction outweighs the risk of NOD.

Section snippets

Predictors of NOD

Studies in different populations have consistently identified the same cluster of risk factors for NOD. Impaired fasting glucose (IFG; defined as a fasting blood sugar from 100 to 125 mg/dL), a family history of diabetes, and features of the metabolic syndrome are associated with an increased risk of NOD.4 Lifestyle factors, low body mass index (BMI), diet, nonsmoking, moderate alcohol consumption, and regular physical activity were all associated with a reduced risk of NOD in a large cohort

Statins and NOD

In a meta-analysis of 13 large randomized placebo-controlled statin trials with 91,140 participants, of whom 4,278 developed diabetes during a mean follow-up of 4 years,8 statin treatment was associated with a 9% increased risk of diabetes (odds ratio [OR] 1.09, 95% CI 1.02-1.17). It was concluded from this meta-analysis that treatment for 225 patients with a statin for 4 years would result in one extra case of diabetes. The risk appeared to be similar for lipophilic and hydrophilic statins.

Niacin and NOD

The Coronary Drug Project was completed in 1975, but the results with respect to NOD were not published until 2013.26 During a mean follow-up of 6.2 years, the incidence of NOD was 11.4% in niacin-treated patients and 8.62% in the placebo group (HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.12-1.68, P = .012). Randomization to niacin treatment was associated with an increase in NOD both in those with a normal FBG at baseline (6.8% vs 4.9%, HR 1.41, 95% CI 0.97-2.05, P = .07) and in those with IFG (19.8% vs 15.2%, HR 1.34,

Thiazide diuretics and NOD

Shortly after the introduction of thiazide diuretics in the 1950s, it became apparent that they could worsen the control of established type 2 diabetes29 and increase the incidence of NOD.30 Despite this, thiazide diuretics continue to be recommended as first-line therapy for hypertension,31 although at lower doses than those used in the early trials. Calibrating the risk of NOD from clinical trials of antihypertensive drugs is complicated because the comparator drug is rarely placebo and may

ß-Blockers and NOD

ß-Blockers were recommended as first-line therapy for hypertensive patients with ischemic heart disease, according to the seventh Joint National Committee guidelines published in 2003.31 However, in the United Kingdom, ß-blockers have not been first- or second-line treatment since 2006.48 Recent meta-analyses suggest that for uncomplicated hypertension, compared with other antihypertensive drugs, ß-blockers are associated with an increased risk of stroke, especially in the elderly, with no

Prevention of drug-related NOD

Irrespective of whether or not drug-related NOD affects long-term CV risk, its prevention is important. New-onset diabetes increases the health care burden at both a population level and an individual level. The patient with NOD will likely require more medications, more medical visits, more laboratory tests, and glucose monitoring. In some health care systems, such a patient may have to pay more for health insurance. The cumulative effect of these changes is likely to worsen quality of life,

Acknowledgements

No extramural funding was used to support this work. The authors are solely responsible for the design and conduct of this work, the drafting and editing of the manuscript, and its final contents.

References (67)

  • J.B. Kostis et al.

    Long-term effect of diuretic-based therapy on fatal outcomes in subjects with isolated systolic hypertension with and without diabetes

    Am J Cardiol

    (2005)
  • S. Bangalore et al.

    A meta-analysis of 94,492 patients with hypertension treated with beta blockers to determine the risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus

    Am J Cardiol

    (2007)
  • O. Vardeny et al.

    Opposing effects of β blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on development of new-onset diabetes mellitus in patients with stable coronary artery disease

    Am J Cardiol

    (2011)
  • S. Jacob et al.

    Antihypertensive therapy and insulin sensitivity: do we have to redefine the role of beta-blocking agents?

    Am J Hypertens

    (1998)
  • J. Lindström et al.

    Sustained reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes by lifestyle intervention: follow-up of the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study

    Lancet

    (2006)
  • P. Deedwania et al.

    Reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients with coronary heart disease and metabolic syndrome: analysis of the Treating to New Targets study

    Lancet

    (2006)
  • International Diabetes Federation

    IDF diabetes atlas update

  • M.K. Ali et al.

    Achievement of goals in U.S. diabetes care, 1999-2010

    N Engl J Med

    (2013)
  • K.L. Ong et al.

    Trends in C-reactive protein levels in US adults from 1999 to 2010

    Am J Epidemiol

    (2013)
  • J.P. Reis et al.

    Lifestyle factors and risk for new-onset diabetes: a population-based cohort study

    Ann Intern Med

    (2011)
  • P.W. Wilson et al.

    Prediction of incident diabetes mellitus in middle-aged adults: the Framingham Offspring Study

    Arch Intern Med

    (2007)
  • D. Preiss et al.

    Risk of incident diabetes with intensive-dose compared to moderate-dose statin therapy: a meta-analysis

    JAMA

    (2011)
  • R.R. Holman et al.

    Atorvastatin in Factorial with Omega-3 EE90 Risk Reduction in Diabetes (AFORRD): a randomized controlled trial

    Diabetalogia

    (2009)
  • C.B. Newman et al.

    The safety and tolerability of atorvastatin 10 mg in the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS)

    Diab Vasc Dis Res

    (2008)
  • R.H. Knopp et al.

    Efficacy and safety of atorvastatin in the prevention of cardiovascular end points in subjects with type 2 diabetes

    Diabetes Care

    (2006)
  • MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol-lowering with simvastatin in 5963 people with diabetes: a randomised placebo-controlled trial

    Lancet

    (2003)
  • H.M. Colhoun et al.

    Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with atorvastatin in type 2 diabetes in the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS): multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial

    Lancet

    (2004)
  • Efficacy of cholesterol-lowering therapy in 18 686 people with diabetes in 14 randomised trials of statins: a meta-analysis

    Lancet

    (2008)
  • J. Shepherd et al.

    Effect of lowering LDL cholesterol substantially below currently recommended levels in patients with coronary heart disease and diabetes

    Diabetes Care

    (2006)
  • M. Ishikawa et al.

    Distinct effects of pravastatin, atorvastatin, and simvastatin on insulin secretion from a beta-cell line, MIN6 cells

    J Atheroscler Thromb

    (2006)
  • M. Kanda et al.

    Effects of atorvastatin and pravastatin on glucose tolerance in diabetic rats mildly induced by streptozotocin

    Biol Pharm Bull

    (2003)
  • R.P. Narayanan et al.

    Atorvastatin administration is associated with dose-related changes in IGF bioavailability

    Eur J Endocrinol

    (2013)
  • J.E. Mallinson et al.

    Blunted Akt/FOXO signalling and activation of genes controlling atrophy and fuel use in statin myopathy

    J Physiol

    (2009)
  • Cited by (26)

    • Liver fat accumulation assessed by computed tomography is an independent risk factor for diabetes mellitus in a population-based study: SESSA (Shiga Epidemiological Study of Subclinical Atherosclerosis)

      2020, Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
      Citation Excerpt :

      And the effect of self-selection bias might remain. Finally, we did not consider the medication class effect which relate to insulin secretion or sensitivity although some of the antihypertensive and lipid-lowering agents were reported to be related with the new onset of diabetes [42] or reduce the risk of it [43–45]. In conclusion, the L/S ratio, indicating liver fat accumulation as assessed by CT, was associated with a higher risk for diabetes mellitus during a 5-year follow-up in a Japanese community-based study.

    • Cardiovascular drugs promoting diabetes

      2019, Archives des Maladies du Coeur et des Vaisseaux - Pratique
    • Ageing and fasting glucose values - The role of cardiovascular events

      2015, European Geriatric Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Our evaluation reveals some limitations, because the study participants were patients attending a medical outdoor center. A further critical aspect is the influence of cardiovascular medication with an influence on the risk of new-onset diabetes [38], especially regarding the effects of statin therapy with a possible association between statin use and incident diabetes in patients with underlying risk factors [39]. However, fasting glucose levels were already higher at entry to the evaluation – and thus years before the cardiovascular complication – in patients with a future CVE.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    d

    K.L.O. was supported by the program grant (1037903) from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia and a Grant-in-Aid (G 12S 6681) from the National Heart Foundation of Australia.

    View full text