Terminating ventricular tachyarrhythmias using far-field low-voltage stimuli: mechanisms and delivery protocols

Heart Rhythm. 2013 Aug;10(8):1209-17. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.04.027. Epub 2013 Apr 27.

Abstract

Background: Low-voltage termination of ventricular tachycardia (VT) and atrial fibrillation has shown promising results; however, the mechanisms and full range of applications remain unexplored.

Objectives: To elucidate the mechanisms for low-voltage cardioversion and defibrillation and to develop an optimal low-voltage defibrillation protocol.

Methods: We developed a detailed magnetic resonance imaging-based computational model of the rabbit right ventricular wall. We applied multiple low-voltage far-field stimuli of various strengths (≤1 V/cm) and stimulation rates in VT and ventricular fibrillation (VF).

Results: Of the 5 stimulation rates tested, stimuli applied at 16% or 88% of the VT cycle length (CL) were most effective in cardioverting VT, the mechanism being consecutive excitable gap decreases. Stimuli given at 88% of the VF CL defibrillated successfully, whereas a faster stimulation rate (16%) often failed because the fast stimuli did not capture enough tissue. In this model, defibrillation threshold energy for multiple low-voltage stimuli at 88% of VF CL was 0.58% of the defibrillation threshold energy for a single strong biphasic shock. Based on the simulation results, a novel 2-stage defibrillation protocol was proposed. The first stage converted VF into VT by applying low-voltage stimuli at times of maximal excitable gap, capturing large tissue volume and synchronizing depolarization; the second stage terminated VT. The energy required for successful defibrillation using this protocol was 57.42% of the energy for low-voltage defibrillation when stimulating at 88% of VF CL.

Conclusions: A novel 2-stage low-voltage defibrillation protocol using the excitable gap extent to time multiple stimuli defibrillated VF with the least energy by first converting VF into VT and then terminating VT.

Keywords: AF; CL; Computer simulation; DFT; Electric countershock; Electric stimulation; RV; Tachycardia, Ventricular; V(m); VEP; VF; VT; Ventricular fibrillation; atrial fibrillation; cycle length; defibrillation threshold; extracellular potential; right ventricle/ventricular; transmembrane potential; ventricular fibrillation; ventricular tachycardia; virtual electrode polarization; Φ(e).

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Computer Simulation
  • Defibrillators
  • Electric Countershock / methods*
  • Electric Stimulation Therapy / methods*
  • Heart Ventricles / physiopathology*
  • Rabbits
  • Tachycardia, Ventricular / therapy*
  • Ventricular Fibrillation / therapy*