Clinical Investigation
Factors Associated With Patient Delay in Seeking Care After Worsening Symptoms in Heart Failure Patients

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2011.04.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

To receive optimal treatment and care, it is essential that heart failure (HF) patients react adequately to worsening symptoms and contact a health care provider early. This specific “patient delay” is an important part of the total delay time. The purpose of this study was to assess patient delay and its associated variables in HF patients.

Methods and Results

In this cross-sectional study, data of 911 hospitalized HF patients from 17 Dutch hospitals (mean age 71 ± 12 years; 62% male; left ventricular ejection fraction 34 ± 15%) were analyzed. During the index hospitalization, patient delay and HF symptoms were assessed by interview. Patients completed questionnaires on depressive symptoms, knowledge and compliance. Clinical and demographic data were collected from medical charts and interviews by an independent data collector. Logistic regression analysis was performed to examine independent associations with patient delay. Median patient delay was 48 hours; 296 patients reported short delay (<12 h) and 341 long delay (≥168 h). A history of myocardial infarction (MI) (odds ratio [OR] 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34-0.71) or stroke (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.24-0.76) was independently associated with short patient delay. Male gender, more HF knowledge, and more HF symptoms were associated with long patient delay. No differences were found between patients with and without a history of HF.

Conclusions

Patients with a history of a life-threatening event (MI or stroke) had a shorter delay than patients without such an event. Patients without a life-threatening event might need to be educated on the recognition and need for appropriate action in a different way then those with an acute threatening previous experience.

Section snippets

Methods

This descriptive cross-sectional study on patient delay is a secondary analysis of COACH (Coordinating study evaluating Outcomes of Advising and Counseling in Heart failure). COACH was a randomized, multicenter, controlled study in which 1,023 hospitalized HF patients were included between November 2002 and February 2005 (registered at trialregister.nl, no. NTC98675639).18, 19 Patients were included in the study during an admission for HF (New York Heart Association [NYHA] functional class

Characteristics of the Study Population

A total of 1,023 patients participated in COACH. Of these patients, 112 had a patient delay time of 0 hours and, at the same time, were in NYHA functional class IV at admission and were therefore excluded from analyses. Those patients did not significantly differ in age, gender, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from the 911 patients included in this substudy. The mean age of the study population (n = 911) was 71 ± 12 years, and 62% were male. The mean length of HF symptoms was 32 ±

Discussion

Although delay in HF patients was assessed in earlier studies, those studies assessed the time from worsening symptoms to arrival at the hospital. The scope of the present study was on patient delay, reflecting the time from worsening symptoms to actually contacting a health care provider. The most important findings of this study were that a history of MI or stroke was independently associated with short patient delay. We also found that male gender, more HF knowledge, and the presence of

Conclusion and Implications

Patients with a history of a serious, life-threatening event, such as MI or stroke, contacted a health care provider earlier in case of worsening HF symptoms, compared with those without such events. More HF knowledge, male gender, and more HF symptoms were also independently associated with long patient delay in all patients and those with a history of HF. Although these results might suggest a profile of HF patients vulnerable to long delay in seeking care after worsening symptoms, further

Disclosures

None.

References (32)

  • G. de Luca et al.

    Time delay to treatment and mortality in primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: every minute of delay counts

    Circulation

    (2004)
  • D.K. Moser et al.

    Reducing delay in seeking treatment by patients with acute coronary syndrome and stroke: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on cardiovascular nursing and stroke council

    Circulation

    (2006)
  • M.M. Friedman et al.

    Heart failure patients” time, symptoms, and actions before a hospital admission

    J Cardiovasc Nurs

    (2008)
  • C.Y. Jurgens et al.

    Why do elders delay responding to heart failure symptoms?

    Nurs Res

    (2009)
  • C.H. Rasmussen et al.

    Patient delay from onset of chest pain suggesting acute coronary syndrome to hospital admission

    Scand Cardiovasc J

    (2003)
  • S.E. Sheifer et al.

    Time to presentation with acute myocardial infarction in the elderly: associations with race, sex, and socioeconomic characteristics

    Circulation

    (2000)
  • Cited by (31)

    • Symptom Status Questionnaire – Heart Failure – Brazilian Version: cross-cultural adaptation and content validation

      2021, Heart and Lung
      Citation Excerpt :

      Brazil has similar numbers of HF-related hospitalizations and deaths, with over 880,000 hospitalizations and 98,000 deaths from the disease since 2016.2 In patients with HF, persistent symptoms even after therapeutic optimization are prevalent,3–6 indicate poor prognosis,7 and are common causes for hospitalization.7–10 In addition, HF symptoms are associated with impaired functional capacity and limited performance of activities of daily living11 and are the most important predictors of quality of life,7,12 which is considerably poorer than that of age- and gender-matched elders.13

    • Computerized auditory cognitive training to improve cognition and functional outcomes in patients with heart failure: Results of a pilot study

      2015, Heart and Lung
      Citation Excerpt :

      Such cognitively impaired patients with HF are 30% more likely to have poor self-care,8–10 medication adherence,11,12 and quality of life.13–15 Additionally, such patients delay seeking medical care for HF symptoms,16–18 and have higher mortality rates.19 Although multiple cognitive intervention studies in older adults have demonstrated improvements in cognition,20,21 there is scant research on interventions to improve cognitive function among patients with HF,22 which could potentially improve self-care.

    • Prolonged impact of home versus clinic-based management of chronic heart failure: Extended follow-up of a pragmatic, multicentre randomized trial cohort

      2014, International Journal of Cardiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Significantly, as in our previous trials [3,16], group survival curves deviate at the point of application of the pivotal home visit at 7–14 days post-discharge. This phenomenon suggests immediate benefits in terms of detecting and managing residual/de novo clinical instability in a patient population in whom delay to treatment is common [24]. As suggested by the survival data presented in Fig. 1 and Appendix IV, whatever difference home-based management makes initially, it is probably reinforced with further home visits in survivors and persists over the longer-term.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supported by the Netherlands Heart Foundation (grant 2000Z003).

    See page 662 for disclosure information.

    View full text