Clinical Investigation
Measurement of Chamber Volumes by Real-Time 3D TTE
Test-Retest Variability of Volumetric Right Ventricular Measurements Using Real-Time Three-Dimensional Echocardiography

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2011.02.007Get rights and content

Background

Substantial variability in sequential echocardiographic right ventricular (RV) quantification may exist. Interobserver and intraobserver values are well known, but acquisition (test-retest) variability has been rarely assessed. The objective of this study was to determine the test-retest variability of sequential RV volume and ejection fraction (EF) measurements by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography in patients with congenital heart disease and healthy controls.

Methods

Twenty-eight participants (21 patients with congenital heart disease, seven healthy controls; mean age, 30 ± 14 years; 43% men) underwent a series of three echocardiographic studies. To obtain interobserver and intraobserver test-retest variability, two sonographers acquired sequential RV data sets in each participant during one outpatient visit. RV volumetric quantification was done using semiautomated three-dimensional border detection. The variability data were analyzed using correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman analysis, and coefficients of variation.

Results

Absolute mean differences for sequential intraobserver acquisitions were 12 ± 12 mL for end-diastolic volume, 7 ± 6 mL for end-systolic volume, and 4 ± 3% for EF. Interobserver and intraobserver test-retest variability, respectively, were 7% and 7% for RV end-diastolic volume, 14% and 7% for end-systolic volume, and 8% and 6% for EF.

Conclusions

Good test-retest variability, besides the practical nature of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography for RV volume and EF assessment, makes it a valuable technique for serial follow-up. Although it may be challenging to diminish all factors that can influence echocardiographic examination for serial follow-up, standardization of RV size and functional measurements should be a goal to produce more interchangeable data.

Section snippets

Study Design

We prospectively recruited 33 participants (21 patients with complex and/or surgically repaired CHD and 12 healthy controls) in sinus rhythm, who all underwent RT3DE. The patients were referred to the echocardiography laboratory for routine measurements of their cardiac function and had sufficient acoustic windows. The healthy controls were employees of the university or the hospital who had no medical histories or current symptoms suggestive of cardiovascular disease, including hypertension

Results

Of the original 33 participants, five were excluded from analysis for echocardiographic images of insufficient quality (four because of poor acoustic windows and one because of the inability to include the RV lateral wall and apex). The baseline characteristics of 28 participants (mean age, 30 ± 14 years; 43% men) are listed in Table 1. The patients who were included had the following types of CHD: atrial septal defect (n = 5), tetralogy of Fallot (n = 3), aortic valve pathology (n = 5),

Discussion

In this study, we investigated the test-retest variability of RT3DE for RV volumes and EF assessment. To include a heterogeneous population with wider ranges of observed measurements, we included not only healthy controls but patients with various types of CHD as well. The smallest coefficients of variation were found for end-diastolic volume and EF. The larger variability found in the end-systolic volumes can be attributed to the more difficult endocardial border identification in end-systole

Conclusions

The good test-retest variability of RT3DE for RV volume and EF assessment makes it a valuable technique for serial follow-up. Furthermore, sequential use of this technique is attractive because no ionizing radiation is needed and patient discomfort is minimal. In clinical practice, different approaches to echocardiographic examination for repeated studies influence the acquisition variability adversely. Even though it may be challenging to diminish these influences, standardization of RV size

References (22)

  • A.L. Knauth et al.

    Ventricular size and function assessed by cardiac MRI predict major adverse clinical outcomes late after tetralogy of Fallot repair

    Heart

    (2008)
  • Cited by (34)

    • Strengths and weaknesses of echocardiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension

      2018, International Journal of Cardiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      There are two distinct approaches to 3-dimensional imaging of the RV: use of a special matrix-array transducer to fully cover the entire RV and knowledge-based reconstruction of the RV based on 2-dimensional images with spatial position and orientation of the probe defined by a magnetic field tracking system [44,45]. Three-dimensional echo RV measurements are reproducible [46], and both approaches agree reasonably well with cardiac magnetic resonance volumes [44]. While the appeal of the knowledge-based approach, since it requires additional proprietary hardware, may be fading with improvements in 3-dimensional image acquisition, the anterior sub-sternal position of the RV precludes complete acquisition in a substantial minority of patients [35].

    • Three-dimensional Echocardiography in Congenital Heart Disease: An Expert Consensus Document from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography

      2017, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
      Citation Excerpt :

      The disparity between 3DE and MRI becomes larger in the severely dilated RV where there are particular difficulties in the incorporation of the whole RV, particularly the RV outflow tract in a single volume.105,106,108,114 Intraobserver, interobserver, and test–retest reliability varies among studies, but is generally acceptable (Table 4).104,106,107 In children with hypoplastic left heart syndrome, 3DE has good reproducibility during serial follow-up.115

    • Accuracy and Test-Retest Reproducibility of Two-Dimensional Knowledge-Based Volumetric Reconstruction of the Right Ventricle in Pulmonary Hypertension

      2015, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
      Citation Excerpt :

      The reproducibility of FAC postprocessing alone (not including variability in image acquisition) has also been shown to have significant interobserver bias and wide limits of agreement in children after surgical repair of tetralogy of Fallot compared with 2D KBR.22 The test-retest reproducibility of 2D KBR RV volumetric quantification is also improved compared with that previously demonstrated by 3DE in either congenital heart disease15 or acquired PH.7 The superior reproducibility of 2D KBR compared with conventional 2DE and that previously reported for 3DE may be accounted for by several reasons.

    • Accuracy and reproducibility of right ventricular quantification in patients with pressure and volume overload using single-beat three-dimensional echocardiography

      2015, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
      Citation Excerpt :

      This is important clinically, as follow-up studies will vary depending on operator experience for both acquisition and postprocessing. Few studies so far have addressed 3D echocardiographic test-retest reproducibility for both the acquisition and postprocessing stages.22,41 Our interobserver test-retest study demonstrated a second operator bias for EDV underestimation, conferring lower SV and EF measurements.

    • Right ventricular normal measurements: Time to index?

      2012, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
      Citation Excerpt :

      Measurement variation seems to be concentrated around two main factors: the user and the image. Different users measuring the same image account for similar variation as the same user measuring two images of the same subject.31 This suggests that the potential source of variation is the individual interpretation of where each measurement should be made.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text