<div><h4>Outcomes of Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.</h4><i>Ahmad D, Yousef S, Kliner D, Brown JA, ... Thoma FW, Sultan I</i><br /><AbstractText>Structural valve degeneration is increasingly seen given the higher rates of bioprosthetic heart valve use for surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Valve-in-valve TAVR (VIV-TAVR) is an attractive alternate for patients who are otherwise at high risk for reoperative surgery. We compared patients who underwent VIV-TAVR and native valve TAVR through a retrospective analysis of our institutional transcatheter valve therapy (TVT) database from 2013 to 2022. Patients who underwent either a native valve TAVR or VIV-TAVR were included. VIV-TAVR was defined as TAVR in patients who underwent a previous surgical aortic valve replacement. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to obtain survival estimates. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used for the multivariable analysis of mortality. A total of 3,532 patients underwent TAVR, of whom 198 (5.6%) underwent VIV-TAVR. Patients in the VIV-TAVR cohort were younger than patients who underwent native valve TAVR (79.5 vs 84 years, p <0.001), with comparable number of women and a higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score (6.28 vs 4.46, p <0.001). The VIV-TAVR cohort had a higher incidence of major vascular complications (2.5% vs 0.8%, p = 0.008) but lower incidence of permanent pacemaker placement (2.5% vs 8.1%, p = 0.004). The incidence of stroke was comparable between the groups (VIV-TAVR 2.5% vs native TAVR 2.4%, p = 0.911). The 30-day readmission rates (VIV-TAVR 7.1% vs native TAVR 9%, p = 0.348), as well as in-hospital (VIV-TAVR 2% vs native TAVR 1.4%, p = 0.46), and overall (VIV-TAVR 26.3% vs native TAVR 30.8%, p = 0.18) mortality at a follow-up of 1.8 years (0.83 to 3.5) were comparable between the groups. The survival estimates were also comparable between the groups (log-rank p = 0.27). On multivariable Cox regression analysis, VIV-TAVR was associated with decreased hazards of death (hazard ratio 0.68 [0.5 to 0.9], p = 0.02). In conclusion, VIV-TAVR is a feasible and safe strategy for high-risk patients with bioprosthetic valve failure. There may be potentially higher short-term morbidity with VIV-TAVR, with no overt impact on survival.</AbstractText><br /><br />Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.<br /><br /><small>Am J Cardiol: 15 Mar 2024; 215:1-7</small></div>

<div><h4>Clinical Impact of In-Stent Calcification in Coronary Arteries: Optical Coherence Tomography Study.</h4><i>Jinnouchi H, Sakakura K, Taniguchi Y, Yamamoto K, ... Seguchi M, Fujita H</i><br /><AbstractText>In-stent restenosis with neoatherosclerosis has been known as the predictor of target lesion revascularization (TLR) after percutaneous coronary intervention. However, the impact of in-stent calcification (ISC) alone on clinical outcomes remains unknown since neoatherosclerosis by optical coherence tomography includes in-stent lipid and calcification. We aimed to assess the effect of ISC on clinical outcomes and clinical differences among different types of ISC. We included 126 lesions that underwent optical coherence tomography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention and divided those into the ISC group (n = 38) and the non-ISC group (n = 88) according to the presence of ISC. The cumulative incidence of clinically driven TLR (CD-TLR) was compared between the ISC and non-ISC groups. The impact of in-stent calcified nodule and nodular calcification on CD-TLR was evaluated using the Cox hazard model. The incidence of CD-TLR was significantly higher in the ISC group than in the non-ISC group (p = 0.004). In the multivariate Cox hazard model, ISC was significantly associated with CD-TLR (hazard ratio [HR] 3.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33 to 9.65, p = 0.01). In-stent calcified nodule/nodular calcification and in-stent nodular calcification alone were also the factors significantly associated with CD-TLR (HR 3.34, 95%CI 1.15 to 9.65, p = 0.03 and HR 5.21, 95%CI 1.82 to 14.91, p = 0.002, respectively). ISC without in-stent calcified nodule/nodular calcification, which was defined as in-stent smooth calcification, was not associated with CD-TLR. In conclusion, ISC was associated with a higher rate of CD-TLR. The types of calcifications that led to a high rate of CD-TLR were in-stent calcified nodule/nodular calcification and in-stent nodular calcification alone but not in-stent smooth calcification. In-stent calcified nodule and nodular calcification should be paid more attention.</AbstractText><br /><br />Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.<br /><br /><small>Am J Cardiol: 01 Mar 2024; 214:115-124</small></div>

<div><h4>Effects of reduced sedentary time on resting, exercise and post-exercise blood pressure in inactive adults with metabolic syndrome - a six-month exploratory RCT.</h4><i>Norha J, Sjöros T, Garthwaite T, Laine S, ... Kalliokoski KK, Heinonen IHA</i><br /><AbstractText>Evidence on the long-term effects of reducing sedentary behaviour (SB) on blood pressure (BP) is scarce. Therefore, we performed a sub-analysis of the BP effects of a six-month intervention that aimed at reducing SB by 1 h/day and replacing it with non-exercise activities. Sixty-four physically inactive and sedentary adults with metabolic syndrome (58% female, 58 [SD 7] years, BP 143/88 [16/9] mmHg, SB 10 [1] h/day) were randomised into intervention (INT, n = 33) and control (CON, n = 31) groups. Resting BP and BP at each stage during and after a graded maximal bicycle ergometer test were measured before and after the intervention. SB, standing, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), and light physical activity (LPA) were measured in six-second intervals at baseline and during the whole six-month intervention using hip-worn accelerometers. The analyses were adjusted for BP medication status. The intervention resulted in a 40 min/day reduction in SB and concomitant 20 min/day increase in MVPA. Resting systolic BP was lower in the CON group before and after the intervention. No group x time interactions were observed in resting BP or BP during exercise at submaximal or maximal intensities, or during recovery. The changes in LPA and MVPA were inversely correlated with the changes in BP during light-to-moderate intensity exercise. An intervention that resulted in a 40 min/day reduction in SB for six months was not sufficient at influencing BP at rest, during or after exercise in adults with metabolic syndrome. However, successfully increasing LPA or MVPA might lower BP during light-to-moderate-intensity activities.</AbstractText><br /><br />© 2024. The Author(s).<br /><br /><small>J Hum Hypertens: 01 Apr 2024; 38:314-321</small></div>