Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Genomic profiling informs diagnoses and treatment in vascular anomalies

Abstract

Vascular anomalies are malformations or tumors of the blood or lymphatic vasculature and can be life-threatening. Although molecularly targeted therapies can be life-saving, identification of the molecular etiology is often impeded by lack of accessibility to affected tissue samples, mosaicism or insufficient sequencing depth. In a cohort of 356 participants with vascular anomalies, including 104 with primary complex lymphatic anomalies (pCLAs), DNA from CD31+ cells isolated from lymphatic fluid or cell-free DNA from lymphatic fluid or plasma underwent ultra-deep sequencing thereby uncovering pathogenic somatic variants down to a variant allele fraction of 0.15%. A molecular diagnosis, including previously undescribed genetic causes, was obtained in 41% of participants with pCLAs and 72% of participants with other vascular malformations, leading to a new medical therapy for 63% (43/69) of participants and resulting in improvement in 63% (35/55) of participants on therapy. Taken together, these data support the development of liquid biopsy-based diagnostic techniques to identify previously undescribed genotype–phenotype associations and guide medical therapy in individuals with vascular anomalies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Clinical overview.
Fig. 2: Methods and technical aspects of the study.
Fig. 3: Molecular yield and findings.
Fig. 4: Medical impact of molecular testing.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

De-identified next-generation sequencing data for participants are available through controlled access at dbGaP with accession number phs003197.v1.p1. Data will be made available for secondary research only after investigators have obtained approval from the NIH to use the requested data for a particular project. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Makinen, T., Boon, L. M., Vikkula, M. & Alitalo, K. Lymphatic malformations: genetics, mechanisms and therapeutic strategies. Circ. Res. 129, 136–154 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Queisser, A., Seront, E., Boon, L. M. & Vikkula, M. Genetic basis and therapies for vascular anomalies. Circ. Res. 129, 155–173 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wassef, M. et al. Vascular anomalies classification: recommendations from the international society for the study of vascular anomalies. Pediatrics 136, e203–e214 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Li, D. et al. ARAF recurrent mutation causes central conducting lymphatic anomaly treatable with a MEK inhibitor. Nat. Med. 25, 1116–1122 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Adams, D. M. et al. Efficacy and safety of sirolimus in the treatment of complicated vascular anomalies. Pediatrics 137, e20153257 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Ricci, K. W. et al. Efficacy of systemic sirolimus in the treatment of generalized lymphatic anomaly and Gorham-Stout disease. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 66, e27614 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Hammill, A. M. et al. Sirolimus for the treatment of complicated vascular anomalies in children. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 57, 1018–1024 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Triana, P. et al. Sirolimus in the treatment of vascular anomalies. Eur. J. Pediatr. Surg. 27, 86–90 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Foster, J. B. et al. Kaposiform lymphangiomatosis effectively treated with MEK inhibition. EMBO Mol. Med. 12, e12324 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Dori, Y. et al. Severe lymphatic disorder resolved with MEK inhibition in a patient with Noonan syndrome and SOS1 mutation. Pediatrics 146, e20200167 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chowers, G., et al. Treatment of severe kaposiform lymphangiomatosis positive for NRAS mutation by MEK inhibition. Pediatr Res. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-022-01986-0 (2022).

  12. Pfeiffer, F. et al. Systematic evaluation of error rates and causes in short samples in next-generation sequencing. Sci. Rep. 8, 10950 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Smith, T., Heger, A. & Sudbery, I. UMI-tools: modeling sequencing errors in unique molecular identifiers to improve quantification accuracy. Genome Res. 27, 491–499 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu, M. et al. Genetics etiologies and genotype phenotype correlations in a cohort of individuals with central conducting lymphatic anomaly. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 30, 1022–1028 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mackie, A. S., Veldtman, G. R., Thorup, L., Hjortdal, V. E. & Dori, Y. Plastic bronchitis and protein-losing enteropathy in the Fontan patient: evolving understanding and emerging therapies. Can. J. Cardiol. 38, 988–1001 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dori, Y. & Smith, C. L. Lymphatic disorders in patients with single ventricle heart disease. Front Pediatr. 10, 828107 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Ghosh, R. M. et al. Prevalence and cause of early Fontan complications: does the lymphatic circulation play a role? J. Am. Heart Assoc. 9, e015318 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Li, D. et al. Pathogenic variant in EPHB4 results in central conducting lymphatic anomaly. Hum. Mol. Genet. 27, 3233–3245 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Byrne, A. B. et al. Pathogenic variants in MDFIC cause recessive central conducting lymphatic anomaly with lymphedema. Sci. Transl. Med. 14, eabm4869 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Li, D. et al. Expanded phenotypic spectrum of JAG1-associated diseases: central conducting lymphatic anomaly with a pathogenic variant in JAG1. Clin. Genet. 99, 742–743 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Konczyk, D. J. et al. Arteriovenous malformation MAP2K1 mutation causes local cartilage overgrowth by a cell-non autonomous mechanism. Sci. Rep. 10, 4428 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Zenner, K. et al. Cell-free DNA as a diagnostic analyte for molecular diagnosis of vascular malformations. Genet. Med. 23, 123–130 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sun, Y. et al. Cell-free DNA from plasma as a promising alternative for detection of gene mutations in patients with Maffucci syndrome. Hereditas 159, 4 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Wiggins, J. M., Ali, S. & Polsky, D. Cell-free DNA in dermatology research. J. Invest. Dermatol. 142, 1523–1528 e1521 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Palmieri, M. et al. Cell-free DNA next-generation sequencing liquid biopsy as a new revolutionary approach for arteriovenous malformation. JVS Vasc. Sci. 1, 176–180 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Biderman Waberski, M. et al. Urine cell-free DNA is a biomarker for nephroblastomatosis or Wilms tumor in PIK3CA-related overgrowth spectrum (PROS). Genet. Med. 20, 1077–1081 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen, W. L. et al. The utility of cerebrospinal fluid-derived cell-free DNA in molecular diagnostics for the PIK3CA-related megalencephaly-capillary malformation (MCAP) syndrome: a case report. Cold Spring Harb. Mol. Case Stud. 8, a006188 (2022).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Allen-Rhoades, W. et al. Cellular variant of kaposiform lymphangiomatosis: a report of three cases, expanding the morphologic and molecular genetic spectrum of this rare entity. Hum. Pathol. 122, 72–81 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Barclay, S. F. et al. A somatic activating NRAS variant associated with kaposiform lymphangiomatosis. Genet. Med. 21, 1517–1524 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Schuart, C. et al. Cutis marmorata telangiectatica congenita being caused by postzygotic GNA11 mutations. Eur. J. Med. Genet. 65, 104472 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rofes, P. et al. Mosaicism in PTEN-new case and comment on the literature. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 30, 641–644 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhou, X. P. et al. Germline and germline mosaic PTEN mutations associated with a Proteus-like syndrome of hemihypertrophy, lower limb asymmetry, arteriovenous malformations and lipomatosis. Hum. Mol. Genet. 9, 765–768 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Caux, F. et al. Segmental overgrowth, lipomatosis, arteriovenous malformation and epidermal nevus (SOLAMEN) syndrome is related to mosaic PTEN nullizygosity. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 15, 767–773 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Konczyk, D. J. et al. Arteriovenous malformation associated with a HRAS mutation. Hum. Genet. 138, 1419–1421 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Rodriguez-Laguna, L. et al. Somatic activating mutations in PIK3CA cause generalized lymphatic anomaly. J. Exp. Med. 216, 407–418 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Sheppard, S. E. et al. Lymphatic disorders caused by mosaic, activating KRAS variants respond to MEK inhibition. JCI Insight https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.155888 (2023).

  37. Homayun-Sepehr, N. et al. KRAS-driven model of Gorham-Stout disease effectively treated with trametinib. JCI Insight 6, e149831 (2021).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Nozawa, A. et al. A somatic activating KRAS variant identified in an affected lesion of a patient with Gorham-Stout disease. J. Hum. Genet. 65, 995–1001 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Chang, C. A. et al. Novel findings and expansion of phenotype in a mosaic RASopathy caused by somatic KRAS variants. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 185, 2829–2845 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. DePristo, M. A. et al. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat. Genet. 43, 491–498 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Wang, K., Li, M. & Hakonarson, H. ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, e164 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Cingolani, P. et al. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly 6, 80–92 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Dunn, T. et al. Pisces: an accurate and versatile variant caller for somatic and germline next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 35, 1579–1581 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Wu, L. R., Chen, S. X., Wu, Y., Patel, A. A. & Zhang, D. Y. Multiplexed enrichment of rare DNA variants via sequence-selective and temperature-robust amplification. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 1, 714–723 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Villefranc, J. A., Amigo, J. & Lawson, N. D. Gateway compatible vectors for analysis of gene function in the zebrafish. Dev. Dyn. 236, 3077–3087 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Jung, H. M. et al. Development of the larval lymphatic system in zebrafish. Development 144, 2070–2081 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the patients and their families for participating in the research. We also thank the Comprehensive Vascular Anomaly Program for clinical care. The work was supported by a Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Frontier Program Grant (D.M.A., H.H.), Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia K-Readiness Grant (S.E.S.), the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under award number 5R21TR003331 (D.L.), a research grant from the Lymphatic Malformation Institute (D.L.), and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development under award number ZIA-HD009003-01 (S.E.S.). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. We thank A. Hoofring of NIH Medical Arts for his assistance with the preparation of Fig. 2c.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

D.L., S.E.S. and H.H. conceived the study. D.L., S.E.S., A.J.B., F.W., M.E.M., C.S. designed the methodology. M.E.M., M.R.B., L.S.M., C.S., M.C.M. and S.M.P. performed functional investigations. D.L., S.E.S., M.E.M., L.S.M., L.F.S., A.S.S., G.K., E.P., A.J.B., A.D.B., L.B., M.Q., J.R.R., J.A.N., D.W.L., S.V., J.T., C.L.S., A.M.C., K.M.S., D.M.A., Y.D. and H.H. carried out formal analysis. D.L., S.E.S., M.E.M., L.S.M., L.F.S., A.S.S., A.J.B., E.P., A.D.B., M.Q., J.R.R., J.A.N., D.W.L., S.V., J.T., C.L.S., A.M.C., K.M.S., D.M.A., Y.D., H.H., L.T., F.W., J.D., R.P.S., S.N.C., C.H., C.K. and K.N. conducted investigation. D.L., S.E.S., M.E.M., L.S.M., L.F.S., A.S.S., E.P., A.J.B., M.Q., J.R.R., J.A.N., D.W.L., S.V., J.T., C.L.S., A.M.C., K.M.S., D.M.A., Y.D., H.H. and J.D. performed data curation. D.L., S.E.S., L.F.S., A.S.S., A.J.B., S.R., J.D., M.E.M. and C.S. provided visualization. B.N., T.S., N.O., A.T. and L.W. carried out project administration. D.L. and S.E.S. wrote the original draft. All authors performed reviewing and editing. D.L., S.E.S., M.C., D.M.A., Y.D. and H.H. provided supervision. D.L., S.E.S., D.M.A., Y.D. and H.H. acquired funding. D.M.A., Y.D. and H.H. contributed equally to this manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Dong Li or Hakon Hakonarson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

H.H. and CHOP are equity holders in Nobias Therapeutics, which is developing MEK inhibitor therapy for complex lymphatic anomalies. D.M.A. is a consultant for Novartis Pharmaceuticals and Nobias. K.M.S. is a consultant for Novartis Pharmaceuticals, which makes Vijoice (alpelisib), a selective PI3Ka inhibitor. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Medicine thanks Douglas Marchuk and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling editor: Anna Maria Ranzoni, in collaboration with the Nature Medicine team.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Functional characterization of BRAF-F486S, RAF1-T145P, and KRAS-A146T.

Transduction of BRAF-F486S (a) or RAF1-T145P (c) significantly increased the level of p-ERKs and Trametinib treatment led to a significant reduction of p-ERKs. Three-dimensional lymphatic spheroid sprouting assay showed elevated sprouting activity in HDLECs expressing BRAF-F486S (b) or RAF1-T145P (d) compared to its WT as measured by both cumulative sprout length and number of sprouts. Trametinib treatment led to a significant reduction of both cumulative sprout length and number of sprouts. For a-d, three independent experiments were performed. P values were calculated using 2-sided t-tests and included in each panel (degree of freedom was included in the Source Data for Extended Data Fig. 1), and corrected for multiple testing using the FDR (Benjamini and Hochberg) method. Bar graphs in panels a and c represent mean fold change in the ratio of pERK to GAPDH, normalized to the untreated wild type. Error bars represent standard deviations. In the box and whisker plots in panels b and d, the line in the middle of the box represents the medians, tops and bottoms of the boxes represent the 25th and 75th quartiles respectively, and the whiskers extend to 1.5 times the interquartile range beyond the 25th and 75th quartiles. All the data points that are summarized by the boxplots are superimposed as dots on the plots; minima and maxima can be determined by the highest and lowest dots. e, e’, Expression of KRASWT had no impact on lymphatic vessel morphology in trunk. f, f’, Expression of KRASA146T resulted in lymphatic tissue expansion (asterisks) and dilation of the thoracic duct (dotted line). Red: Expression of transgene in trunk of zebrafish at 5dpf, Green: mrc1a:GFF labeling lymphatic vessels. g, Quantitation of WT EK larvae that were assayed for pericardial edema at 5 dpf. Injected embryos were screened for transgenic mCherry expression in endothelial cells prior to quantitation so that only transgenic expressing embryos were counted. The p-values in the graph were calculated via Fisher’s Exact tests (two-sided) between samples as indicated, followed by Bonferroni correction. Indicated n are the total number of larvae assayed per condition.

Source data

Supplementary information

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Table 1

Molecular findings for the cohort and validation.

Supplementary Table 2

Molecular findings in blood or saliva samples in patients who typically have germline variants.

Supplementary Table 3

Molecular findings from deep exome sequencing.

Supplementary Table 4

Molecular findings from UMI panel ultra-deep sequencing.

Supplementary Table 5

Molecular findings from FFPE samples.

Supplementary Table 6

Molecular findings from body fluid samples.

Supplementary Table 7

Molecular findings from cfDNA.

Supplementary Table 8

PIK3CA variants were identified in 45 patients with blood and lymphatic malformations.

Supplementary Table 9

BDA and qPCR oligonucleotide sequences.

Source data

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 1

Unprocessed western blots.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 1

Statistical source data.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, D., Sheppard, S.E., March, M.E. et al. Genomic profiling informs diagnoses and treatment in vascular anomalies. Nat Med 29, 1530–1539 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02364-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02364-x

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research