Letter to the EditorReply to Letter: Merigo et al., “De trop” meta-analyses and systematic reviews in cardiopulmonary resuscitation – A way to rapidly improve authors’ citation index at a price of real science
Section snippets
Disclosures
Authors report no conflicts of interest. PPD reports recent or current funding from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Pittsburgh Emergency Medicine Foundation, Clinical and Translational Science Institute of the University of Pittsburgh.
Declaration of Competing Interest
Authors report no conflicts of interest. PPD reports recent or current funding from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Pittsburgh Emergency Medicine Foundation, Clinical and Translational Science Institute of the University of Pittsburgh.
Acknowledgements
None.
References (4)
- et al.
“De trop” meta-analyses and systematic reviews in cardiopulmonary resuscitation – a way to rapidly improve authors’ citation index at a price of real science
Resuscitation
(2023) - et al.
Nearly 80 systematic reviews were published each day: Observational study on trends in epidemiology and reporting over the years 2000–2019
J Clin Epidemiol
(2021)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (0)
© 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.