The role of P21-activated kinase (Pak1) in sinus node function

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjmcc.2023.04.004Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The loss of p21-activated kinase (Pak1) results in sinoatrial node (SAN) bradycardia.

  • Pak1 regulates the SAN pacemaker's membrane clock component by attenuating class II HDAC4 activity.

  • During atrial fibrillation (AF), downregulation of Pak1 can contribute to SAN bradycardia through ERK1/2 activation.

Abstract

Sinoatrial node (SAN) dysfunction (SND) and atrial arrhythmia frequently occur simultaneously with a hazard ratio of 4.2 for new onset atrial fibrillation (AF) in SND patients. In the atrial muscle attenuated activity of p21-activated kinase 1 (Pak1) increases the risk for AF by enhancing NADPH oxidase 2 dependent production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). However, the role of Pak1 dependent ROS regulation in SAN function has not yet been determined. We hypothesize that Pak1 activity maintains SAN activity by regulating the expression of the hyperpolarization activated cyclic nucleotide gated cation channel (HCN).

To determine Pak1 dependent changes in heart rate (HR) regulation we quantified the intrinsic sinus rhythm in wild type (WT) and Pak1 deficient (Pak1−/−) mice of both sexes in vivo and in isolated Langendorff perfused hearts. Pak1−/− hearts displayed an attenuated HR in vivo after autonomic blockage and in isolated hearts. The contribution of the Ca2+ clock to pacemaker activity remained unchanged, but Ivabradine (3 μM), a blocker of HCN channels that are a membrane clock component, eliminated the differences in SAN activity between WT and Pak1−/− hearts. Reduced HCN4 expression was confirmed in Pak1−/− right atria. The reduced HCN activity in Pak1−/− could be rescued by class II HDAC inhibition (LMK235), ROS scavenging (TEMPOL) or attenuation of Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase (ERK) 1/2 activity (SCH772984). No sex specific differences in Pak1 dependent SAN regulation were determined.

Our results establish Pak1 as a class II HDAC regulator and a potential therapeutic target to attenuate SAN bradycardia and AF susceptibility.

Introduction

The heart's pacemaker, the sinoatrial node (SAN), consists of specialized muscle fibers that rhythmically generate electrical activity. This basal automaticity or intrinsic sinus rhythm (SR) is under constant control of the autonomic nervous system (ANS). SAN bradycardia, a manifestation of sinus node dysfunction (SND), describes the inability of the heart's natural pacemaker to generate cardiac excitation at an appropriate frequency [1]. SND and atrial arrhythmia frequently coincide [[1], [2], [3]] and SND itself increases the hazard ratio for atrial fibrillation (AF) by promoting dispersion of repolarization, reentry, and atrial ectopy [[4], [5], [6]]. In patients with AF and animal models of atrial tachyarrhythmia on the other hand, SAN automaticity is attenuated but can recover after cardioversion indicating an arrhythmia induced remodeling of the pacemaker mechanism [5,7,8].

The SAN pacemaker cells exhibit distinct electrophysiological and calcium (Ca2+) handling properties that allow them to rhythmically generate action potentials (APs). Due to the scarcity of the inward rectifier potassium (K+) channel (IK1, Kir2.1–2.4), SAN cells exhibit a depolarized maximum diastolic potential and a progressive depolarization of the resting membrane potential (Vm) during diastole (diastolic depolarization). The diastolic depolarization is driven by two coupled cellular pacemaker mechanisms that have been termed the Ca2+- and membrane- clock [1,9,10]. Due to their coordinated action and interdependence, they make up the coupled-clock mechanism.

The contribution of the Ca2+ clock to SAN pacemaker activity depends on the release of Ca2+ from the sarcoplasmic reticulum through the activation of ryanodine or inositol 1,4,5-tris phosphate receptor (RyR and IP3R, respectively) channels [[9], [10], [11], [12]]. These release events that increase in frequency toward the end of diastole [12,13], are translated into a depolarization of Vm by the electrogenic sodium‑calcium exchanger (NCX) which in the forward mode extrudes one Ca2+ ion by bringing 3 Na+ ions into the cell [11,[13], [14], [15]]. The rate of depolarization by the Ca2+ clock depends on the interplay between the Ca2+-load of the SR, the open probability of the Ca2+ release channels, as well as the expression and activity of NCX [10,16]. One driver of the membrane clock is the pacemaker current (If) through the hyperpolarization-activated, cyclic-nucleotide gated cation channel (HCN) [4,[17], [18], [19]]. The current is activated upon repolarization, counters further hyperpolarization of Vm, and contributes to the early phase of the diastolic depolarization [4,17]. Of the 4 HCN protein isoforms identified, HCN4 predominates in the human and rodent SAN and its deletion in animal models leads to a significant reduction of If, SAN bradycardia, and frequent sinus pauses [18,20,21]. In humans, loss of function mutations in the HCN4 channel or its auxiliary proteins have been associated with SAN bradycardia as well as AF, AV-block, and tachy-bradycardia [20,22,23]. In addition, voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels (VDCCs), tetrodotoxin (TTX)-sensitive Na+ channels (INa,TTX) [24,25], as well as transient receptor potential (TRPM and TRPC) [26] channels have been shown to contribute to the membrane clock. The T- type (Cav3.1) and L-type (Cav1.2, Cav1.3) channels expressed in SAN tissue, not only contribute to the membrane clock by furthering the depolarization, but also critically modulate the Ca clock mechanism. VDCC dependent Ca influx regulates the SR load and thereby the RyR open probability, and the frequency of the spontaneous Ca release events [13,[27], [28], [29]].

The serine/threonine protein kinase p21-activated kinase (Pak1), activated by Ras related small G-protein, exerts cardioprotective signaling [[30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35]]. Pak1 attenuates cardiac hypertrophic remodeling by counteracting mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activity [34] and in atrial and ventricular myocytes we demonstrated that Pak1 regulates the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by antagonizing the activity of the nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase 2 (NOX2). Attenuation of Pak1 activity consequently increases cellular ROS production and the propensity for arrhythmic Ca2+ release in the atria and ventricle after ischemia reperfusion injury [33,35].

A ROS dependent remodeling of SAN pacemaker activity has been described in animal models of hypertension [36,37], diabetes [38], ischemia reperfusion [39], and cardiomyopathy [40]. The disease induced SAN bradycardia was shown to be a consequence of enhanced NOX2 as well as mitochondrial ROS production [36,39,40]. The ROS mediated reduction in pacemaker function was attributed to altered activity of the Ca2+ calmodulin kinase II (CaMKII) [37,41] and a subsequent increase in pacemaker cell apoptosis or a reduction in RyR open probability and subsequent attenuation of Ca2+ clock activity, respectively. As an alternative mechanism, a ROS dependent increase in class II histone deacetylase 4 (HDAC4) activity was linked to attenuated HCN4 protein expression [40]. Pak1 can regulate cardiac pacemaker activity by counteracting the positive chronotropic effect of β-adrenergic stimulation through activation of its downstream target protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) and the reduction of L-type Ca2+ channel and inwardly rectifying K+-channel activity [42]. Under physiological conditions however, when the heart rate (HR) is under the influence of the ANS, no differences in pacemaker activity were determined between WT and Pak1−/− animals [34,35]. The impact of Pak1 on SAN function in the absence of ANS control has yet to be determined. Since loss of Pak1 activity increases the susceptibility for AF and SAN dysfunction can be the cause and consequence of AF, in the current study, we aimed to determine the role of Pak1 in the regulation of cardiac pacemaker activity. In vivo, in the whole heart, and on the cellular level we tested the hypothesis, that Pak1 maintains SAN activity by regulating the expression of HCN through attenuation of NOX2 dependent ROS production and suppression of class II HDAC activity.

Section snippets

Animals

Hearts were isolated from 3- to 6-month-old male and female WT (FVB/N; The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME USA) and Pak1 deficient mice (Pak1−/−) [31,33,35]. Animals were maintained at a 12–12-h light-dark cycle and food and water were provided ad libitum. To determine the role of class II HDACs, ROS production and β-adrenergic signaling in the remodeling of SAN function, WT and Pak1−/− animals were treated with either class II HDAC inhibitor LMK235 (intraperitoneal (IP) injections,

Intrinsic heart rate

In SAN cells the stimulation of Pak1 attenuates the response to β-adrenergic stimulation [42] however, loss of Pak1 in vivo, did not alter the sinus rhythm (SR). To quantify the intrinsic HR independent from ANS regulation, we recorded ECGs under isoflurane anesthesia from male and female WT and Pak1−/− mice under basal conditions and after ANS block. Parasympathetic signaling was suppressed with the muscarinic receptor blocker atropine (1 mg/kg) whereas sympathetic signaling was attenuated

Discussion

In the present study we demonstrate for the first time that in male and female hearts Pak1 plays an important role in maintaining the intrinsic SAN frequency by regulating HCN4 expression and the contribution of If to pacemaker activity. Pak1 activity attenuates ERK1/2 phosphorylation and thereby antagonizes the class II HDAC dependent suppression of MEF-2 and HCN4 expression.

Limitations

In our experimental approach we have not further quantified the current densities and kinetics of If, VDCCs [13,[27], [28], [29]], INa,TTX [24,25], TRPM and TRPC channels [26] by voltage clamp recordings. Accordingly, we can't entirely rule out that differences in these parameters, especially the current kinetic, exist. However, we would expect these differences to be minor given that a) the difference in pacemaker activity was eliminated by IVA, b) the difference in If contribution can be

Conclusion

Our results demonstrate that Pak regulates intrinsic pacemaker activity by maintaining HCN expression. Attenuation of Pak1 enhances NOX2 dependent ROS production and increases ERK1/2 activity, which results in enhanced class II HDAC activity and a decrease in If. We demonstrated that in Pak1−/− hearts, attenuation of ROS but not attenuation of SAN bradycardia is protective against AF. Our results establish Pak1 as a class II HDAC regulator and potential therapeutic target for SAN dysfunction.

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Declaration of Competing Interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by funding from the National Institutes for Health R01s to KB (HL128330, HL155762, and HL164453).

References (80)

  • N. Black et al.

    Circadian rhythm of cardiac electrophysiology, arrhythmogenesis, and the underlying mechanisms

    Heart Rhythm.

    (2019)
  • Y. Yaniv et al.

    New evidence for coupled clock regulation of the normal automaticity of sinoatrial nodal pacemaker cells: bradycardic effects of ivabradine are linked to suppression of intracellular Ca(2+) cycling

    J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol.

    (2013)
  • S.Y. Han et al.

    Effects of tertiapin-Q and ZD7288 on changes in sinoatrial pacemaker rhythm during vagal stimulation

    Auton. Neurosci.

    (2015)
  • D. Varma et al.

    Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor - reactive oxygen signaling domain regulates excitation-contraction coupling in atrial myocytes

    J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol.

    (2022)
  • J.P. Fahrenbach et al.

    Decreased intercellular coupling improves the function of cardiac pacemakers derived from mouse embryonic stem cells

    J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol.

    (2008)
  • V. Vedantham et al.

    Spatiotemporal regulation of an Hcn4 enhancer defines a role for Mef2c and HDACs in cardiac electrical patterning

    Dev. Biol.

    (2013)
  • T. Ago et al.

    A redox-dependent pathway for regulating class II HDACs and cardiac hypertrophy

    Cell.

    (2008)
  • D. Zhang et al.

    Converse role of class I and class IIa HDACs in the progression of atrial fibrillation

    J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol.

    (2018)
  • M. Choudhury et al.

    Biology of the sinus node and its disease

    Arrhythmia Electrophysiol. Rev.

    (2015)
  • E.E. Egom et al.

    Impaired sinoatrial node function and increased susceptibility to atrial fibrillation in mice lacking natriuretic peptide receptor C

    J. Physiol. Lond.

    (2015)
  • P.-S. Yang et al.

    Risk of sick sinus syndrome in patients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation: a population-based cohort

    J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol.

    (2021)
  • D. DiFrancesco

    HCN4, sinus bradycardia and atrial fibrillation

    Arrhythmia Electrophysiol. Rev.

    (2015)
  • A. Elvan et al.

    Pacing-induced chronic atrial fibrillation impairs sinus node function in dogs. Electrophysiological remodeling

    Circulation.

    (1996)
  • J.J. Kim et al.

    Bradycardia alters Ca2+ dynamics enhancing dispersion of repolarization and arrhythmia risk

    Am. J. Physiol. Heart C

    (2013)
  • E.G. Manios et al.

    Sinus pacemaker function after cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation: is sinus node remodeling related with recurrence?

    J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol.

    (2001)
  • Y.-H. Yeh et al.

    Funny current downregulation and sinus node dysfunction associated with atrial tachyarrhythmia: a molecular basis for tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome

    Circulation

    (2009)
  • V.A. Maltsev et al.

    Dynamic interactions of an intracellular Ca2+ clock and membrane ion channel clock underlie robust initiation and regulation of cardiac pacemaker function

    Cardiovasc. Res.

    (2008)
  • N. Kapur et al.

    Inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate-mediated spontaneous activity in mouse embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes

    J. Physiol. Lond.

    (2007)
  • T.M. Vinogradova et al.

    Rhythmic ryanodine receptor Ca2+ releases during diastolic depolarization of sinoatrial pacemaker cells do not require membrane depolarization

    Circ. Res.

    (2004)
  • J. Huser et al.

    Intracellular Ca2+ release contributes to automaticity in cat atrial pacemaker cells

    J. Physiol. Lond.

    (2000)
  • T.M. Vinogradova et al.

    Rhythmic Ca2+ oscillations drive sinoatrial nodal cell pacemaker function to make the heart tick

    Ann N Y Acad Sci

    (2005)
  • K.Y. Bogdanov et al.

    Sinoatrial nodal cell ryanodine receptor and Na(+)-ca(2+) exchanger: molecular partners in pacemaker regulation

    Circ. Res.

    (2001)
  • T.M. Vinogradova et al.

    Sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ pumping kinetics regulates timing of local Ca2+ releases and spontaneous beating rate of rabbit sinoatrial node pacemaker cells

    Circ. Res.

    (2010)
  • J. Stieber et al.

    The hyperpolarization-activated channel HCN4 is required for the generation of pacemaker action potentials in the embryonic heart

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2003)
  • E. Nof et al.

    Point mutation in the HCN4 cardiac Ion channel pore affecting synthesis, trafficking, and functional expression is associated with familial asymptomatic sinus bradycardia

    Circulation.

    (2007)
  • E.A. Accili et al.

    From funny current to HCN channels: 20 years of excitation

    News Physiol. Sci.

    (2002)
  • M. Baruscotti et al.

    Deep bradycardia and heart block caused by inducible cardiac-specific knockout of the pacemaker channel gene Hcn4

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.

    (2011)
  • M. Lei et al.

    Sinus node dysfunction following targeted disruption of the murine cardiac sodium channel gene Scn5a

    J. Physiol.

    (2005)
  • M. Lei et al.

    Requirement of neuronal- and cardiac-type sodium channels for murine sinoatrial node pacemaking

    J. Physiol.

    (2004)
  • M. Demion et al.

    TRPM4, a Ca2+−activated nonselective cation channel in mouse sino-atrial node cells

    Cardiovasc. Res.

    (2007)
  • View full text