Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
Clinical InvestigationsTransesophageal Echocardiographic Imaging of the Mitral ValveDiagnostic Accuracy of Transesophageal Echocardiographic Commissural-Biplane Approach in Identifying Mitral Valve Anatomy
Introduction
Mitral regurgitation (MR) is the most common valvular disorder encountered in clinical practice, and the second most prevalent valvular disorder to require percutaneous or surgical intervention.1,2 Mitral regurgitation is classified into primary, resulting from structural abnormalities of the mitral valve (MV) components, and secondary, due to left ventricular (LV; or atrial) dilation without significant MV structural defects.3 Three-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) imaging complemented by surgical exploration of the MV anatomy is the reference standard in determining MR etiology and identifying the involved segments.4, 5, 6 Surgical MV intervention, including repair and replacement, is recommended for symptomatic significant primary MR and asymptomatic severe MR with left ventricle dysfunction.7
Surgical intervention of the MV is considered the procedure of choice in treating MR of all etiologies.8,9 Different surgical techniques are used in MV intervention based on valve morphology; thus, detailed information about the anatomy and extent of leaflet involvement is a critical presurgical requisite to plan suitability for surgical repair versus replacement.10,11
Transesophageal echocardiography is considered the imaging modality of choice for the evaluation of MV structure, assessment of the involved leaflet/scallops, and MR severity before surgery.12 The multiplane TEE imaging algorithm (i.e., the multiplane approach [MPA]) is the approach recommended by the American Society of Echocardiography.11, 12, 13, 14 The multiplane approach has an excellent overall diagnostic accuracy in identifying the affected posterior MV scallops (lateral, P1; middle, P2; and medial, P3) and anterior (lateral, A1; middle, A2; and medial, A3) segments. With this approach, the accuracy varies among different MV scallops/segments, which range between 97% with the P2 scallop and 90% with the A3 segment;11 however, a proper assessment of commissural involvement is still a limitation.
More recently, Hahn et al.15,16 have proposed a new commissural-biplane approach (CBA) for assessing MV abnormalities using the bicommissural view and simultaneous biplane sweep over the lateral (A1/P1), middle (A2/P2), and medial aspects (A3/P3) of the MV leaflets. This approach, which avails itself of newer echocardiographic technology recently introduced in commercially available platforms, has not been fully validated. In this study, we aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the TEE multiplane and CBA approaches when compared with findings from 3D-TEE as the standard method.
Section snippets
Methods
We prospectively enrolled patients with moderate and severe MR on transthoracic echocardiography who were referred for TEE between January 2019 and December 2020 to assess the etiology and severity of MR. Patients who subsequently underwent surgical MV intervention were enrolled in the final analysis. Individuals with severe MR who underwent MV clip or declined surgical intervention were excluded. The study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee. All patients signed informed
Results
One hundred two consecutive patients with severe MR underwent surgical intervention. The mean age at the time of the surgery was (65 ± 11) years (range, 19-86 years), and 37 (36.3%) were female. The indications for surgery were symptoms of heart failure in 82 (80.4%) and reduced LVEF or LV chamber dilatation in 9 (8.8%); the remaining 11 (10.8%) were due to symptoms as well as reduced LVEF. Other baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1.
Preoperative LVEF was normal in 80.4% of the
Discussion
In this study we investigated the diagnostic performance of TEE conventional multiplane and bicommissural approaches compared with 3D-TEE with intraoperative surgical findings in identifying MV abnormalities. We found that both approaches have an excellent diagnostic accuracy in defining the affected MV segments/scallops. However, the bicommissural method was significantly more accurate in diagnosing commissural defects.
Multiple TEE imaging protocols have been proposed to identify the affected
Conclusion
The new commissural TEE approach has a higher sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy than the conventional approach in evaluating MV commissures when compared with the intraoperative findings, and it may have a role complementary to other TEE approaches in the assessment of MV abnormalities.
References (25)
- et al.
Mitral regurgitation
Lancet
(2009) - et al.
Multiperspective three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiographic assessment of mitral valve area in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis
J Am Soc Echocardiogr
(2023) - et al.
Variations in mitral valve leaflet and scallop anatomy on three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography
J Am Soc Echocardiogr
(2022) - et al.
Diagnostic accuracy of transillumination in mitral valve prolapse: Side-by-side comparison of standard transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiography against surgical findings
J Am Soc Echocardiogr
(2021) - et al.
The value of three-dimensional echocardiography derived mitral valve parametric maps and the role of experience in the diagnosis of pathology
J Am Soc Echocardiogr
(2011) - et al.
A near 100% repair rate for mitral valve prolapse is achievable in a reference center: implications for future guidelines
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
(2012) - et al.
Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography accurately predicts mitral valve anatomy and suitability for repair
J Am Soc Echocardiogr
(2002) - et al.
Recommendations for noninvasive evaluation of native valvular regurgitation: a report from the American Society of echocardiography developed in Collaboration with the Society for Cardiovascular magnetic resonance
J Am Soc Echocardiogr
(2017) - et al.
Guidelines for performing a comprehensive transesophageal echocardiographic examination: recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists
J Am Soc Echocardiogr
(2013) - et al.
Recommended standards for the performance of transesophageal echocardiographic Screening for structural heart intervention: from the American Society of echocardiography [published correction appears in J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2022 Apr;35(4):447]
J Am Soc Echocardiogr
(2022)
Accurate localization of mitral regurgitant defects using multiplane transesophageal echocardiography
Ann Thorac Surg
ASE/SCA guidelines for performing a comprehensive intraoperative multiplane transesophageal echocardiography examination: recommendations of the American Society of echocardiography Council for intraoperative echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Task Force for Certification in Perioperative transesophageal echocardiography
J Am Soc Echocardiogr
Cited by (2)
Transesophageal Echocardiographic Imaging Approaches for Identifying Mitral Valve Anatomy
2024, Journal of the American Society of EchocardiographyBiplane Imaging: In the Land of the Blind, the One-Eyed Man Is King
2023, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
Conflicts of Interest: None.