State-of-the-Art Review
Peridevice Leak After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Incidence, Mechanisms, Clinical Impact, and Management

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2022.12.006Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

Highlights

  • PDL after LAAO are common and are associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events.

  • Comprehensive assessment of a PDL should consider not only its dimensions but also its potential mechanisms.

  • Closure of PDL can be performed using plugs, occluders, coils, or radiofrequency ablation. However, long-term data on these approaches are limited.

  • Novel devices, steerable sheaths, and computational simulation may aid in mitigating the risk of PDL in the future.

Abstract

Left atrial appendage occlusion is an increasingly adopted stroke prevention strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, peridevice leaks after the procedure are not infrequent and have recently been shown to confer a higher risk for subsequent ischemic events. In this paper, the authors review the available research on the frequency, mechanisms, clinical significance, and management of peridevice leak after percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion.

Key Words

anticoagulation
atrial fibrillation
left atrial appendage occlusion
stroke

Abbreviations and Acronyms

AF
atrial fibrillation
CT
computed tomography
LAA
left atrial appendage
LAAO
left atrial appendage occlusion
NCDR
National Cardiovascular Data Registry
PDL
peridevice leak
TEE
transesophageal echocardiography

Cited by (0)

Ignacios Amat-Santos, MD, served as Guest Editor for this paper.

Lars Søndergaard, MD, served as Guest Editor-in-Chief for this paper.

The authors attest they are in compliance with human studies committees and animal welfare regulations of the authors’ institutions and Food and Drug Administration guidelines, including patient consent where appropriate. For more information, visit the Author Center.