Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 401, Issue 10373, 28 January 2023, Pages 269-280
The Lancet

Articles
Momelotinib versus danazol in symptomatic patients with anaemia and myelofibrosis (MOMENTUM): results from an international, double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02036-0Get rights and content

Summary

Background

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors approved for myelofibrosis provide spleen and symptom improvements but do not meaningfully improve anaemia. Momelotinib, a first-in-class inhibitor of activin A receptor type 1 as well as JAK1 and JAK2, has shown symptom, spleen, and anaemia benefits in myelofibrosis. We aimed to confirm the differentiated clinical benefits of momelotinib versus the active comparator danazol in JAK-inhibitor-exposed, symptomatic patients with anaemia and intermediate-risk or high-risk myelofibrosis.

Methods

MOMENTUM is an international, double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study that enrolled patients at 107 sites across 21 countries worldwide. Eligible patients were 18 years or older with a confirmed diagnosis of primary myelofibrosis or post-polycythaemia vera or post-essential thrombocythaemia myelofibrosis. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive momelotinib (200 mg orally once per day) plus danazol placebo (ie, the momelotinib group) or danazol (300 mg orally twice per day) plus momelotinib placebo (ie, the danazol group), stratified by total symptom score (TSS; <22 vs ≥22), spleen size (<12 cm vs ≥12 cm), red blood cell or whole blood units transfused in the 8 weeks before randomisation (0 units vs 1–4 units vs ≥5 units), and study site. The primary endpoint was the Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) TSS response rate at week 24 (defined as ≥50% reduction in mean MFSAF TSS over the 28 days immediately before the end of week 24 compared with baseline). MOMENTUM is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT04173494, and is active but not recruiting.

Findings

195 patients were randomly assigned to either the momelotinib group (130 [67%]) or danazol group (65 [33%]) and received study treatment in the 24-week randomised treatment period between April 24, 2020, and Dec 3, 2021. A significantly greater proportion of patients in the momelotinib group reported a 50% or more reduction in TSS than in the danazol group (32 [25%] of 130 vs six [9%] of 65; proportion difference 16% [95% CI 6–26], p=0·0095). The most frequent grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events with momelotinib and danazol were haematological abnormalities by laboratory values: anaemia (79 [61%] of 130 vs 49 [75%] of 65) and thrombocytopenia (36 [28%] vs 17 [26%]). The most frequent non-haematological grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events with momelotinib and danazol were acute kidney injury (four [3%] of 130 vs six [9%] of 65) and pneumonia (three [2%] vs six [9%]).

Interpretation

Treatment with momelotinib, compared with danazol, resulted in clinically significant improvements in myelofibrosis-associated symptoms, anaemia measures, and spleen response, with favourable safety. These findings support the future use of momelotinib as an effective treatment in patients with myelofibrosis, especially in those with anaemia.

Funding

Sierra Oncology.

Introduction

Myelofibrosis is a chronic, progressive myeloproliferative neoplasm that might present de novo (ie, primary) or develop from essential thrombocythaemia or polycythaemia vera (ie, secondary).1 Dysregulated Janus kinase (JAK)-mediated signalling, leading to uncontrolled myeloproliferation and elevated inflammatory cytokine production, is characteristic of myelofibrosis and typically manifests as bone marrow fibrosis, anaemia, splenomegaly, and debilitating symptoms (ie, fatigue, cachexia, fever, night sweats).2 Patients with mild myelofibrosis-associated anaemia (defined as haemoglobin ≥10 g/dL but below sex-adjusted lower limit of normal) have a median survival of 4·9 years, those with moderate myelofibrosis-associated anaemia (haemoglobin between 8 g/dL and <10 g/dL) have a median survival of 3·4 years, and patients with severe myelofibrosis-associated anaemia (haemoglobin <8 g/dL or transfusion dependent) have a median survival of 2·1 years.3 Approved JAK inhibitors provide spleen and symptom improvements but do not address—and might induce or worsen—anaemia.4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 Disease-associated or treatment-exacerbated cytopenias might necessitate attenuated JAK inhibitor dosing or discontinuation, which limit treatment efficacy and are associated with poor survival.10, 11, 12

Research in context

Evidence before this study

Dysregulated Janus kinase (JAK)-mediated signalling leading to uncontrolled clonal proliferation and elevated inflammatory cytokine production is characteristic of myelofibrosis and typically manifests as bone marrow fibrosis, anaemia, splenomegaly, and debilitating symptoms. JAK inhibitors approved for the treatment of myelofibrosis provide spleen and symptom improvements but fail to address—and might induce or worsen—anaemia. The investigational agent momelotinib has a unique mechanism of action in that it inhibits not only disease drivers JAK1 and JAK2, but also activin A receptor type 1 (ACVR1), a key regulator of iron metabolism. In the phase 3 SIMPLIFY-1 trial in patients who are naive to JAK inhibitors, momelotinib was non-inferior to ruxolitinib in reducing spleen volume by 35% at week 24 from baseline, and patients who received momelotinib had improvements in transfusion independence rates, haemoglobin concentrations, and roughly half the transfusion burden compared with patients who received ruxolitinib. Preclinical and translational data showed a significant impact on anaemia benefits. Momelotinib did not show non-inferiority to ruxolitinib in reducing total symptom score by at least 50% at week 24 compared with baseline in SIMPLIFY-1, although patients treated with momelotinib reported a 28% symptom response rate. In the phase 3 SIMPLIFY-2 trial in patients previously treated with ruxolitinib, additional symptom responses were observed with momelotinib treatment compared with best available therapy, which was ruxolitinib in 89% of patients. However, superiority of momelotinib in providing additional spleen volume reductions of at least 35% immediately following ruxolitinib treatment without washout was not achieved in SIMPLIFY-2, necessitating a third, redesigned phase 3 study to fully understand the clinical profile of momelotinib in myelofibrosis.

Added value of this study

MOMENTUM is the first randomised, phase 3 study to assess an inhibitor of JAK1, JAK2, and ACVR1 in patients with myelofibrosis and anaemia. The study demonstrated clinically significant benefits in myelofibrosis-associated symptoms, anaemia measures, and spleen responses in symptomatic patients with myelofibrosis and anaemia and previous JAK inhibitor exposure. Furthermore, momelotinib was safe and well tolerated in this advanced patient population, with the overall safety profile of momelotinib consistent with that in previous reports.

Implications of all the available evidence

Anaemia is common in patients with myelofibrosis and is associated with poor survival. Currently approved JAK inhibitors do not meaningfully improve anaemia and can exacerbate anaemia, often requiring attenuated dosing or treatment discontinuation. The clinical benefit seen with momelotinib in patients with myelofibrosis and anaemia, including the reduction of transfusion burden for patients, underscores the potential for momelotinib as a treatment option for this population with high medical need. Given also the favourable safety profile of momelotinib, future research will explore momelotinib in combination with other agents for the treatment of patients with myelofibrosis.

Approaches to managing myelofibrosis-associated anaemia include red blood cell transfusions, erythropoiesis stimulating agents, corticosteroids, androgens such as danazol, immunomodulatory drugs, and splenectomy.10, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 These strategies have shown modest and transient clinical benefit, and none directly target chronic inflammation and iron restriction within erythroid progenitors, which are key mechanistic contributors to myelofibrosis-associated anaemia.18, 19

Momelotinib is a first-in-class oral inhibitor of activin A receptor type 1 (ACVR1), also known as activin receptor-like kinase 2, as well as an inhibitor of JAK1 and JAK2 that has been previously studied in phase 1–3 clinical trials in myelofibrosis.20, 21, 22, 23 In the head-to-head comparison of momelotinib with ruxolitinib in JAK inhibitor-naive patients in SIMPLIFY-1, the primary endpoint of non-inferiority in reducing spleen volume by 35% at week 24 from baseline was met.20 Further, patients who received momelotinib had a higher week 24 transfusion independence rate, increased haemoglobin concentrations, and roughly half the transfusion burden compared with patients who received ruxolitinib.20, 22 Preclinical and translational studies showed that momelotinib's observed anaemia and transfusion benefits are linked to its suppression of ACVR1-mediated hepcidin production, which leads to increased serum iron availability and stimulation of erythropoiesis.24, 25 Notably, elevated hepcidin concentration is significantly associated with shortened overall survival in patients with myelofibrosis.26 Nonetheless, momelotinib did not show non-inferiority to ruxolitinib in reducing total symptom score (TSS) by at least 50% at week 24 compared with baseline in SIMPLIFY-1, although patients treated with momelotinib had a 28% symptom response rate.20 In patients previously treated with ruxolitinib in SIMPLIFY-2, additional symptom responses were observed with momelotinib treatment despite an absence of a ruxolitinib washout period.21 However, superiority of momelotinib in providing additional spleen volume reductions of at least 35% immediately following ruxolitinib treatment without washout was not achieved in SIMPLIFY-2,21 necessitating a third, redesigned phase 3 study to fully understand the clinical profile of momelotinib in myelofibrosis.

We report in this Article results from the MOMENTUM trial of momelotinib versus danazol in symptomatic patients with anaemia and primary, post-essential thrombocythaemia, or post-polycythaemia vera myelofibrosis who previously received JAK inhibitor therapy.

Section snippets

Study design and patients

MOMENTUM is an international, double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study. Patients were enrolled at 107 sites (78 in Europe, 14 in North America, ten in Asia, and five in Australia) in 21 countries. Eligible patients were 18 years or older with a confirmed diagnosis of primary myelofibrosis (per WHO 2016 criteria) or post-polycythaemia vera or post-essential thrombocythaemia myelofibrosis (per International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment criteria) who were

Results

From April 24, 2020, to Dec 3, 2021, 195 patients were enrolled and received blinded study treatment in the 24-week randomised treatment period (130 [67%] in the momelotinib group and 65 [33%] in the danazol group; figure 1). 94 (72%) of 130 patients in the momelotinib group and 38 (58%) of 65 in the danazol group completed randomised treatment; the most common reasons for early treatment discontinuation were adverse events (16 [12%] patients in the momelotinib group and 11 [17%] in the danazol

Discussion

The randomised, phase 3 MOMENTUM study met all prespecified primary and key secondary efficacy endpoints as demonstrated by clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvements in myelofibrosis-associated symptoms, anaemia measures, and spleen size in patients treated with momelotinib compared with danazol. The overall safety profile, including the pattern of adverse events, is consistent with completed clinical studies of momelotinib.20, 21

Current treatment of myelofibrosis is

Data sharing

Sierra Oncology commits to sharing clinical study data with qualified researchers to enable enhancement of public health. As such, Sierra will share anonymised patient-level data on request or if required by law or regulation. Qualified scientific and medical researchers can request patient-level data for studies of Sierra pharmaceutical substances listed on ClinicalTrials.gov and approved by health authorities in the USA and the EU. Patient-level data for studies of newly approved

Declaration of interests

SV reports consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Incyte, Novartis, and Sierra Oncology. ATG reports consulting fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Constellation/MorphoSys, CTI Biopharma, Novartis, Pharma Essentia, and Sierra Oncology. ATK reports grants from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Prelude, and Sierra; consulting fees from AbbVie and Prelude; honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, and Novartis; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board

References (32)

  • S Verstovsek et al.

    A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ruxolitinib for myelofibrosis

    N Engl J Med

    (2012)
  • C Harrison et al.

    JAK inhibition with ruxolitinib versus best available therapy for myelofibrosis

    N Engl J Med

    (2012)
  • A Pardanani et al.

    Safety and efficacy of fedratinib in patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis: a randomized clinical trial

    JAMA Oncol

    (2015)
  • J Mascarenhas et al.

    Pacritinib vs best available therapy, including ruxolitinib, in patients with myelofibrosis: a randomized clinical trial

    JAMA Oncol

    (2018)
  • NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines): myeloproliferative neoplasms....
  • F Palandri et al.

    Life after ruxolitinib: reasons for discontinuation, impact of disease phase, and outcomes in 218 patients with myelofibrosis

    Cancer

    (2020)
  • Cited by (49)

    • Small-molecule agents for cancer immunotherapy

      2024, Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    A complete list of principal investigators for the MOMENTUM study is provided in the appendix (pp 2–3)

    View full text