Elsevier

Resuscitation

Volume 182, January 2023, 109639
Resuscitation

Clinical paper
Does time heal fatigue, psychological, cognitive and disability problems in people who experience an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest? Results from the DANCAS survey study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.11.005Get rights and content

Abstract

Aims

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survivors may suffer short-term fatigue, psychological, cognitive and disability problems, but we lack information on the proportion of survivors with these problems in the long-term. Hence, we investigated these problems in survivors 1–5 years post-OHCA and whether the results are different at different time points post-OHCA.

Methods

All adults who survived an OHCA in Denmark from 2016 to 2019 were identified using the Danish Cardiac Arrest Registry and invited to participate in a survey between October 2020 and March 2021. The survey included the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, “Two simple questions” (everyday activities and mental recovery), and the 12-item World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. To investigate results at different time points, survivors were divided into four time-groups (12–24, 25–36, 37–48 and 49–56 months post-OHCA). Differences between time-groups were determined using the Kruskall-Wallis test for the mean scores and Chi-square test for the proportion of survivors with symptoms.

Results

Total eligible survey population was 2116, of which 1258 survivors (60 %) responded. Overall, 29 % of survivors reported fatigue, 20 % anxiety, 15 % depression, and 27 % disability. When survivors were sub-divided by time since OHCA, no significant difference was found on either means scores or proportion between time groups (p = 0.28 to 0.88).

Conclusion

Up to a third of survivors report fatigue, anxiety, depression, reduced mental function and disability 1–5 years after OHCA. This proportion is the same regardless of how much time has passed supporting early screening and tailored post-OHCA interventions to help survivors adapt to their new situation.

Introduction

Successful advances in community resuscitation and acute hospital interventions have led to increasing numbers of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survivors.1 Yet, survival after OHCA can be complicated by fatigue, psychological, cognitive and disability problems.[2], [3], [4], [5] The growing focus on life after OHCA has led to ‘Recovery’ being included in the Chain of survival6 and international post-resuscitation guidelines now recommend referral to fatigue-, psychosocial- and cognitive-based support/rehabilitation.2 However, these recommendations are primarily based on studies with survivors < 12 months after OHCA26 and it is possible, that with time, the problems described in these short-term studies may improve without the need for specific post-OHCA interventions.

Where surveys have been conducted with survivors > 12-months after the event, studies are generally very small, [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16] or include a highly select group of survivors, for example, as part of target temperature management studies,[11], [13], [15] or only investigate global measures of neurological status and/or health-related quality of life[7], [17], [18], [19], [20] (see Supplementary Table 1). These global measures are important outcomes for assessing the effect of prehospital or acute hospital interventions, and providing information on overall survivor status. However, to develop, tailor and deliver effective post-OHCA interventions, we need to know what proportion of survivors have domain-specific problems, for example, fatigue or anxiety, and whether this changes with time.

Hence, we investigated fatigue, symptoms of anxiety and depression, mental recovery and disability in survivors 1–5 years since OHCA and, whether the results are different at different time points post-OHCA.

Section snippets

Study design, setting and population

This study has a cross-sectional study design using a sub-set of data from the DANCAS (DANish Cardiac Arrest Survivorship) survey described in the published protocol21 and is reported according to the STROBE guidelines.22 The Danish Cardiac Arrest Registry was used to identify people, ≥18 years of age and resident in Denmark, who suffered an OHCA from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2019 and were alive 30-days after OHCA. We chose the 1–5 years timeframe because this provides both a long-term

Results

Total eligible survey population was 2116, of which 1258 survivors (59.5 %) responded (Fig. 1). Survey participant characteristics are described in Table 1. Mean age was 62.4 (SD 12.8) and 80.7 % were male. Compared to non-respondents, survey respondents were significantly older, male, with longer education, receiving a higher income; more were Western-born, had an OHCA in a public place, and received bystander resuscitation, and they had shorter hospital length of stay and less co-morbidities (

Discussion

As far as we know, this is the largest study of OHCA survivors reporting outcomes up to five years after event. Overall, the proportion of survivors reporting fatigue was 29 %, anxiety 20 %, depression 15 %, and 27 % disability. When asked specifically about their recovery after OHCA, 11 % of survivors felt they now needed help with their everyday activities and a third that they had not fully recovered mentally. As time since OHCA does not seem to change these self-reported problems, our

Conclusion

Up to a third of survivors report fatigue, anxiety, depression, reduced mental recovery and disability 1–5 years after OHCA. This proportion is the same regardless of how much time has passed post-OHCA supporting the need for early screening and tailored post-OHCA interventions to help survivors adapt to their new situation.

Sources of funding

This project was supported by infrastructure provided by REHPA, The Danish knowledge center for rehabilitation and palliative care, Odense Univeristy Hospital which receives funding from the Danish Government. This project is part of a PhD partially funded by a PhD faculty scholarship from the University of Denmark and a stipendium from the Region of Southern Denmark (19/15041).

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Vicky L. Joshi: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation. Lars Hermann Tang: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. Tina Broby Mikkelsen: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. Jørgen Feldbæk Nielsen: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. Line Zinckernagel: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. Britt Borregaard: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. Sachin Agarwal: Methodology, Writing – review & editing. Annette Kjær Ersbøll:

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the OHCA survivors who took the time to complete the survey. Thank you to Helle Collatz Christensen, Kristian Bundgaard Ringgren and everyone involved in the Danish Cardiac Arrest Registy for their help with this project. Thank you to OPEN (Open Patient Data Explorative Network) and Tanja Gram Petersen for their help with the Danish registires. Finally, thank you to Jahan Shabnam, Jens-Jakob Kjer Møller, Josefine Oredson Krone, Nikolaj Nielsen, Sofie Raahauge

References (55)

  • Z. Nehme et al.

    Sex differences in the quality-of-life and functional outcome of cardiac arrest survivors

    Resuscitation

    (2019)
  • J. Soar et al.

    European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: adult advanced life support

    Resuscitation

    (2021)
  • W.T. Longstreth et al.

    Two simple questions to assess neurologic outcomes at 3 months after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: experience from the public access defibrillation trial

    Resuscitation

    (2010)
  • L.B. Strober et al.

    Tired of not knowing what that fatigue score means? Normative data of the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS)

    Mult Scler Relat Disord

    (2020)
  • A. Peskine et al.

    Long-term disabilities of survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the Hanox study

    Chest

    (2021)
  • K.L. Haywood et al.

    Long term outcomes of participants in the PARAMEDIC2 randomised trial of adrenaline in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

    Resuscitation

    (2021)
  • M. Tiainen et al.

    Surviving out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the neurological and functional outcome and health-related quality of life one year later

    Resuscitation

    (2018)
  • S. Johnston et al.

    Fatigue and acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review of contributing factors

    Heart Lung

    (2018)
  • K.B. Ringgren et al.

    2019 Årsrapport Dansk hjertestopregister [Annual report Danish Cardiac Arrest Registry]

    (2020)
  • M. Orbo et al.

    Alterations in cognitive outcome between 3 and 12 months in survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

    Resuscitation

    (2016)
  • K.N. Sawyer et al.

    Sudden cardiac arrest survivorship: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association

    Circulation

    (2020)
  • S. Schnaubelt et al.

    Very long-term survivors of in-hospital and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest show considerable impairment of daily life

    Resuscitation

    (2022)
  • V.R.M. Moulaert et al.

    Long-term outcome after survival of a cardiac arrest: a prospective longitudinal cohort study

    Neurorehabilitation Neural Repair

    (2017)
  • R. Kowalik et al.

    Cardiac arrest survivors treated with or without mild therapeutic hypothermia: performance status and quality of life assessment

    Scandinavian J Trauma Resuscitation Emergency Med

    (2014)
  • S. Saarinen et al.

    Pulseless electrical activity and successful out-of-hospital resuscitation - long-term survival and quality of life: an observational cohort study

    Scandinavian J Trauma Resuscitation Emergency Med

    (2012)
  • A. Viktorisson et al.

    One-year longitudinal study of psychological distress and self-assessed health in survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

    BMJ Open

    (2019)
  • A. Viktorisson et al.

    Well-being among survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a cross-sectional retrospective study in Sweden

    BMJ Open

    (2018)
  • Cited by (7)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text