Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of common rhythm disturbances on echocardiographic measurements and interpretation

  • Review
  • Published:
Clinical Research in Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) remains the workhorse of noninvasive cardiac imaging, allowing to easily obtain precise information on cardiac structure and function. Over time, Doppler interrogation of blood flow velocities, direction, and timing in several locations within the heart became the primary method for haemodynamic assessment, replacing cardiac catheterization in most clinical settings and providing valuable diagnostic and prognostic information on a wide spectrum of cardiac pathological processes. Abnormalities in heart rate, rhythm, and intracardiac electrical conduction are commonly encountered during the performance of echocardiographic studies. Up to now, only a modest attention has been given to the impact of these abnormalities on the reading and interpretation of echocardiographic examination and this assessment has not yet been carried out in a global and systematic way. Tachyarrhythmias, bradyarrhythmias and atrioventricular conduction disturbances influence cardiac structure and mechanics as well as Doppler flow patterns. For this reason, and to be able to avoid misinterpretation, echocardiographers must be aware of the consequences of these common rhythm disturbances on echocardiographic findings. This narrative review aims to describe the current knowledge on this topic, focusing on the expected mechanical effects and Doppler patterns observed on transthoracic echocardiography in patients with common rhythm (tachycardia and bradycardia, atrial flutter and fibrillation and ectopic beats) and conduction disturbances (namely, atrioventricular block).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. DeMaria AN, Mason DT (1977) Echocardiographic evaluation of disturbances of cardiac rhythm and conduction. Chest 71:439–440

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Priori SG, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Mazzanti A, Bloma N, Borggrefe M, Camm J et al (2015) ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death the Task Force for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). Eur Heart J 36:2793–2867

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brignole M, Auricchio A, Baron-Esquivias G, Bordachar P, Boriani G, Breithardt OA et al (2013) 213 ESC guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J 34:2281–2329

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Galderisi M, Cosyns B, Edvardsen T, Cardim N, Delgado V, di Salvo G et al (2017) Standardization of adult transthoracic echocardiography reporting in agreement with recent chamber quantification, diastolic function, and heart valve disease recommendations: An expert consensus document of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 18(12):1301–1310

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mitchell C, Rahko PS, Blauwet LA, Canaday B, Finstuen JA, Foster MC et al (2019) Guidelines for performing a comprehensive transthoracic echocardiographic examination in adults: recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 32(1):1–64

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McAlister NH (2006) CME understanding cardiac “echo” reports practical guide for referring physicians. Can Fam Physician 52(7):869–874

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Nagueh SF, Smiseth OA, Appleton CP, Byrd BF, Dokainish H, Edvardsen T et al (2016) Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 29(4):277–314

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Papadopoulos CH, Oikonomidis D, Lazaris E, Nihoyannopoulos P (2018) Echocardiography and cardiac arrhythmias. Hellenic J Cardiol 59:140–149

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Appleton CP, The Technical Assistance Melissa J Carucci WO, Henry CP, Olajos M, Tucson B (1991) Influence of incremental changes in heart rate on mitral flow velocity: assessment in lightly sedated, conscious dogs. J Am Coll Cardiol 17(1):227–236

  10. Keith Cohn B, Kryda W (1981) The influence of ectopic beats and tachyarrhythmias on stroke volume and cardiac output. J Electrocardiol 14(3):207–218

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zoghbi WA, Adams D, Bonow RO, Enriquez-Sarano M, Foster E, Grayburn PA et al (2017) Recommendations for noninvasive evaluation of native valvular regurgitation: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography developed in collaboration with the society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 30(4):303–371

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lancellotti P, Tribouilloy C, Hagendorff A, Popescu BA, Edvardsen T, Pierard LA et al (2013) Recommendations for the echocardiographic assessment of native valvular regurgitation: An executive summary from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 14(7):611–644

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kerut EK (2008) The mitral L-wave: a relatively common but ignored useful finding. Echocardiography 25:548–550

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. D’Andrea A, Formisano T, Riegler L, Scarafile R, America R, Martone F et al (2017) Acute and chronic response to exercise in athletes: the “supernormal heart”. In: Advances in experimental medicine and biology. Springer, New York, pp 21–41

  15. Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, Chambers JB, Evangelista A, Griffin BP et al (2009) Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 22:1–23

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zoghbi WA, Asch FM, Bruce C, Gillam LD, Grayburn PA, Hahn RT et al (2019) Guidelines for the evaluation of valvular regurgitation after percutaneous valve repair or replacement: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography developed in collaboration with the society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions, Japanese Society of Echocardiography, and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 32(4):431–475

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Billette J, Tadros R (2019) An integrated overview of AV node physiology. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 42(7):805–820

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Barold SS, Ilercil A, Leonelli F, Herweg B (2006) First-degree atrioventricular block: clinical manifestations, indications for pacing, pacemaker management & consequences during cardiac resynchronization. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 17:139–152

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lancellotti P, Zamorano JL, Habib G, Badano L (2016) The EACVI textbook of echocardiography, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 147–161

    Google Scholar 

  20. Keren G, Megidish R, Levitt B, Laniado S (1985) Pulmonary venous flow pattern—its relationship to cardiac dynamics. A pulsed Doppler echocardiographic study. Circulation 71(6):1105–1112

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Li Q, Liu Y, Zuo W, Chen H, Zhao W, Dong L et al (2021) Mechanisms, features, and significance of diastolic mitral regurgitation: a case series. Eur Heart J Case Rep 4(5):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ishikawa T, Kazuo K, Naomichi Miyazaki O, Tochikubo TU, Kashiwagi M, Ishii M (1992) Diastolic mitral regurgitation in patients with first-degree atrioventricular block. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 15(11 Pt 2):1927–1931

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Panidis IP, Ross J, Munley B, Nestico P, Mintz GS (1986) Diastolic mitral regurgitation in patients with atrioventricular conduction abnormalities: a common finding by doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 7(4):768–774

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ishikawa T, Sumita S, Kimura K et al (1994) Critical PQ interval for the appearance of diastolic mitral regurgitation and optimal PQ interval in patients implanted with DDD pacemakers. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 17(11 Pt 2):1989–1994

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Schnittger I, Christopher F, Appleton P, Hatle LK, Popp RL (1988) Diastolic mitral and tricuspid regurgitation by doppler echocardiography in patients with atrioventricalar block: new insight into the mechanism of atrioventricular valve closure. J Am Coll Cardiol 11(1):83–88

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Malm B, Jadbabaie F (2017) Diastolic mitral regurgitation in complete heart block. Texas Heart Inst J 44:228–230

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gorcsan J, Abraham T, Agler DA, Bax JJ, Derumeaux G, Grimm RA et al (2008) Echocardiography for cardiac resynchronization therapy: recommendations for performance and reporting—a report from the American Society of Echocardiography Dyssynchrony Writing Group endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 21:191–213

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Salden FCWM, Kutyifa V, Stockburger M, Prinzen FW, Vernooy K (2018) Atrioventricular dromotropathy: evidence for a distinctive entity in heart failure with prolonged PR interval. Europace 20:1067–1077

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Simpson RF, Langtree J, Mitchell AR (2017) Ectopic beats: how many count? EMJ Cardiol 5(1):88–92

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gunda S, Akyeampong D, Gomez-Arroyo J, Jovin DG, Kowlgi NG, Kaszala K et al (2019) Consequences of chronic frequent premature atrial contractions: association with cardiac arrhythmias and cardiac structural changes. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 30(10):1952–1959

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Bhave NM, Patel AR, Shah AP, Lang RM (2013) Postextrasystolic potentiation in low-gradient, severe aortic stenosis: a poor man’s stress echo? Echocardiography 30(6):E148–E151

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Dehghani P, Singer Z, Morrison J et al (2020) Characteristics and usefulness of unintended premature ventricular contraction during invasive assessment of aortic stenosis. Int J Cardiol 313:35–38

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wiley BM, Pollack A, Vaidya AS, Agarwal SK, Sengupta PP, Chaudhry FA (2017) Post-extrasystolic transaortic valve gradients differentiate “Pseudo” and “True” low-flow, low-gradient severe AS during dobutamine stress echocardiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 10(10 Pt A):1199–1200

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wheeler R, Masani ND (2011) The role of echocardiography in the management of atrial fibrillation. Eur J Echocardiogr 12(10):i33–i38

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Gumprecht J, Szulik M, Domek M, Mazurek M, Shantsila A, Oxborough D et al (2019) Novel echocardiographic biomarkers in the management of atrial fibrillation. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep 12:43

    Google Scholar 

  36. Minners J, Jander N (2021) Consecutive, index and representative beats: obtaining reliable information despite an irregular heart rhythm. Heart 107(11):862–863

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kotecha D, Mohamed M, Shantsila E, Popescu BA, Steeds RP (2017) Is echocardiography valid and reproducible in patients with atrial fibrillation? A systematic review. Europace 19(9):1427–1438

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Kim T-S, Youn H-J (2011) Role of echocardiography in atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Ultrasound 19(2):51

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Lang RM, Badano LP, Tsang W, Adams DH, Agricola E, Buck T et al (2012) EAE/ASE recommendations for image acquisition and display using three-dimensional echocardiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 13:1–46

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Agner R, Katz MG, Williams ZR, Dixen U, Jensen GB, Schwarz KQ (2017) Left ventricular systolic function assessed by global longitudinal strain is impaired in atrial fibrillation compared to sinus rhythm. J Atr Fibrillation 10(4):1437

    Google Scholar 

  41. Nabeshima Y, Seo Y, Takeuchi M (2020) A review of current trends in three-dimensional analysis of left ventricular myocardial strain. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 18(1):23

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Muraru D, Niero A, Rodriguez-Zanella H, Cherata D, Badano L (2018) Three-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography: benefits and limitations of integrating myocardial mechanics with three-dimensional imaging. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 8(1):101–117

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Ren WD, Visentin P, Nicolosi GL, Canterin FA, Dall’aglio V, Lestuzzi C et al (1993) Effect of atrial fibrillation on pulmonary venous flow patterns: transoesophageal pulsed Doppler echocardiographic study. Eur Heart J 14(10):1320–132741

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Alsidawi S, Khan S, Pislaru SV, Nkomo VT (2018) Aortic valve hemodynamics in atrial fibrillation: should the highest Doppler signal be used to estimate severity of aortic stenosis? Echocardiography 35(6):869–871

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Esquitin KA, Khalique OK, Liu Q, Kodali SK, Marcoff L, Nazif TM et al (2019) Accuracy of the single cycle length method for calculation of aortic effective orifice area in irregular heart rhythms. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 32(3):344–350

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Zoneraich S, Zoneraich O, Rhee JJ (1975) Echocardiographic findings in atrial flutter. Circulation 52(3):455–459

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Welch PJ, Afridi I, Joglar JA, Sheehan CJ, Zagrodzky JD, Abraham TP et al (1999) Effect of radiofrequency ablation on atrial mechanical function in patients with atrial flutter. Am J Cardiol 84(4):420–425

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Mustafa Y, Buchbinder NA, Peter CT, Naqvi TZ (2001) Differential atrial stunning after electrical cardioversion: an echo tissue Doppler case study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 14(8):834–837

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Khan IA (2002) Transient atrial mechanical dysfunction (stunning) after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and flutter. Am Heart J 144(1):11–22

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel A. Gomes.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No conflicts of interest to declare.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Video 1 Diastolic mitral regurgitation (DMR) in a patient with 2:1 AV block (MP4 355 KB)

Supplementary Video 2 Triplane for LV ejection fraction assessment in a patient with atrial fibrillation and ischemic cardiomyopathy, after myocardial infarction and previous angioplasty of the proximal right and distal circumflex coronary arteries. LVEF of 40% (MP4 467 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gomes, D.A., Santos, R.R., Freitas, P. et al. Impact of common rhythm disturbances on echocardiographic measurements and interpretation. Clin Res Cardiol 111, 1301–1312 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-022-02096-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-022-02096-x

Keywords

Navigation