Elsevier

Resuscitation

Volume 179, October 2022, Pages 116-123
Resuscitation

Review
The immunology of the post-cardiac arrest syndrome

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.08.013Get rights and content

Abstract

Patients successfully resuscitated from cardiac arrest often have brain injury, myocardial dysfunction, and systemic ischemia–reperfusion injury, collectively termed the post-cardiac arrest syndrome (PCAS). To improve outcomes, potential therapies must be able to be administered early in the post-arrest course and provide broad cytoprotection, as ischemia–reperfusion injury affects all organ systems. Our understanding of the immune system contributions to the PCAS has expanded, with animal models detailing biologically plausible mechanisms of secondary injury, the protective effects of available immunomodulatory drugs, and how immune dysregulation underlies infection susceptibility after arrest. In this narrative review, we discuss the dysregulated immune response in PCAS, human trials of targeted immunomodulation therapies, and future directions for immunomodulation following cardiac arrest.

Introduction

Out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) affects approximately 350,000 adults in the United States every year.1 Despite improvements in the ‘chain of survival’ of early recognition of cardiac arrest, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), early defibrillation, and in hospital post-arrest care, approximately 10.5% of patients who suffer an OHCA survive to hospital discharge. Even if CPR is successful and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) is achieved, multi-organ dysfunction and cardiovascular instability in the first days after arrest and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment (WSLT) due to perceived poor neurological prognosis result in high mortality.2., 3.

During cardiac arrest, forward arterial blood flow ceases and oxygen delivery to tissues falls to zero. This pathologic process leads to whole body ischemia and metabolic failure that is only partially counteracted by CPR, which generates ∼25% of pre-arrest cardiac output.4 In patients that achieve ROSC, blood flow is restored but reperfusion causes a surge in reactive oxygen species (ROS) and sterile inflammation.5 While reperfusion injury begins at the time of ROSC, tissue ischemia can persist post-ROSC due to multiple systemic and tissue level derangements including cardiogenic shock, microthrombosis, and endothelial injury.6

Described by Vladimir Negovsky as the “post-resuscitation disease” the concept of the post-cardiac arrest syndrome (PCAS) was formalized in 2008.6., 7. This syndrome is a constellation of physiologic disturbances observed in patients who achieve ROSC following cardiac arrest. PCAS is generally defined as post-cardiac arrest brain injury, myocardial dysfunction, systemic ischemia–reperfusion injury, and an unresolved pathologic process that precipitated the arrest.6

Critical care for patients following cardiac arrest remains supportive and includes addressing the underlying etiology of arrest, hemodynamic support, lung protective mechanical ventilation, avoidance of hyperoxia and hypoxia, and treatment of infection if present.8 Temperature control following cardiac arrest has been shown to improve outcomes in some9., 10., 11. but not all12., 13. clinical trials. Observational studies have suggested the effect of temperature control may depend on the severity of brain injury,14., 15., 16. however this notion was not supported by a recent meta-analysis.17 Numerous therapeutic agents are undergoing evaluation, yet none have demonstrated improvement in patient centered outcomes in large trials.18., 19., 20. A better understanding of PCAS and the development of therapeutic strategies to reduce organ dysfunction and secondary brain injury are of critical importance given the morbidity and mortality associated with the syndrome. Emerging evidence suggests that the immune system contributes to the pathophysiology of PCAS. In this review, we will discuss the dysregulated immune response that occurs following cardiac arrest and how it contributes to organ injury and infectious susceptibility. We will also highlight recent clinical trials of immunomodulation following cardiac arrest and emerging therapeutic avenues for manipulating the immune system following cardiac arrest.

Section snippets

Methods

We performed a literature search in PubMed with the terms “cardiac arrest”, “post cardiac arrest syndrome”, “immune response”, “immunity”, and “inflammation”. Results were restricted to English but not filtered by year. Articles were assessed by all authors for relevance to the present review. Additionally, we included relevant publications referenced by articles found by our literature search. The literature search is current as of May 1, 2022.

Future directions

Significant progress has been made in understanding the deranged immune response that occurs following cardiac arrest and its contribution to the PCAS, however, key questions remain. Is the systemic inflammation a cause or consequence of the severe injury that occurs during and after cardiac arrest? Indeed, IL-6 levels are correlated with markers of ischemia severity such as doses of adrenaline given during resuscitation, time to ROSC, and lactate on presentation to hospital.25 Importantly, the

Conclusions

Significant progress has been made in understanding the dysregulated immune response that occurs following cardiac arrest. These pre-clinical and observational studies have identified numerous therapeutic targets, however fundamental mechanistic questions remain. Future studies will be required to definitively establish the role the immune system plays in the pathogenesis of PCAS. Nonetheless, trials such as IMICA have shown that it is feasible to modulate the immune response following cardiac

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Cody A. Cunningham: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Patrick J. Coppler: Writing – review & editing. Aaron B. Skolnik: Writing – review & editing.

Acknowledgements

Figure was generated using Biorender (www.biorender.com).

References (82)

  • G. Deng et al.

    Pro-inflammatory T-lymphocytes rapidly infiltrate into the brain and contribute to neuronal injury following cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation

    J Neuroimmunol

    (2014)
  • T. Smida et al.

    Early cytotoxic lymphocyte localization to the brain following resuscitation in a porcine model of asphyxial cardiac arrest: A pilot study

    Resusc Plus

    (2021)
  • V. Banwell et al.

    Systematic review and stratified meta-analysis of the efficacy of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist in animal models of stroke

    J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis

    (2009)
  • J. Bro-Jeppesen et al.

    Level of systemic inflammation and endothelial injury is associated with cardiovascular dysfunction and vasopressor support in post-cardiac arrest patients

    Resuscitation

    (2017)
  • J. Vaahersalo et al.

    Admission interleukin-6 is associated with post resuscitation organ dysfunction and predicts long-term neurological outcome after out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation

    Resuscitation

    (2014)
  • J.T. Niemann et al.

    TNF-α blockade improves early post-resuscitation survival and hemodynamics in a swine model of ischemic ventricular fibrillation

    Resuscitation

    (2013)
  • I. Laurent et al.

    High-volume hemofiltration after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomized study

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2005)
  • K. Broch et al.

    Randomized Trial of Interleukin-6 Receptor Inhibition in Patients With Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2021)
  • S. Grundmann et al.

    Perturbation of the endothelial glycocalyx in post cardiac arrest syndrome

    Resuscitation

    (2012)
  • J. Bro-Jeppesen et al.

    Endothelial activation/injury and associations with severity of post-cardiac arrest syndrome and mortality after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

    Resuscitation

    (2016)
  • T. van der Poll et al.

    The immunology of sepsis

    Immunity

    (2021)
  • Z. Qi et al.

    Overexpression of programmed cell death-1 and human leucocyte antigen-DR on circulatory regulatory T cells in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in the early period after return of spontaneous circulation

    Resuscitation

    (2018)
  • M. Cour et al.

    Cyclosporine A prevents ischemia-reperfusion-induced lymphopenia after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A predefined sub-study of the CYRUS trial

    Resuscitation

    (2019)
  • L. Witten et al.

    Reasons for death in patients successfully resuscitated from out-of-hospital and in-hospital cardiac arrest

    Resuscitation

    (2019)
  • V.C. Marconi et al.

    Efficacy and safety of baricitinib for the treatment of hospitalised adults with COVID-19 (COV-BARRIER): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet

    Respir Med

    (2021)
  • S.S. Virani et al.

    Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2021 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association

    Circulation

    (2021)
  • S. Laver et al.

    Mode of death after admission to an intensive care unit following cardiac arrest

    Intensive Care Med

    (2004)
  • K.G. Lurie et al.

    The Physiology of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

    Anesth Analg

    (2016)
  • R.W. Neumar et al.

    Post-cardiac arrest syndrome: epidemiology, pathophysiology, treatment, and prognostication. A consensus statement from the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation

    Circulation

    (2008)
  • J.P. Nolan et al.

    European Resuscitation Council and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine guidelines 2021: post-resuscitation care

    Intensive Care Med

    (2021)
  • S.A. Bernard et al.

    Treatment of comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with induced hypothermia

    N Engl J Med

    (2002)
  • Hypothermia after Cardiac Arrest Study Group

    Mild therapeutic hypothermia to improve the neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest

    N Engl J Med

    (2002)
  • J.B. Lascarrou et al.

    Targeted Temperature Management for Cardiac Arrest with Nonshockable Rhythm

    N Engl J Med

    (2019)
  • N. Nielsen et al.

    Targeted temperature management at 33°C versus 36°C after cardiac arrest

    N Engl J Med

    (2013)
  • J. Dankiewicz et al.

    Hypothermia versus Normothermia after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

    N Engl J Med

    (2021)
  • C.W. Callaway et al.

    Association of Initial Illness Severity and Outcomes After Cardiac Arrest With Targeted Temperature Management at 36 °C or 33 °C

    JAMA Netw Open

    (2020)
  • M. Nishikimi et al.

    Outcome Related to Level of Targeted Temperature Management in Postcardiac Arrest Syndrome of Low, Moderate, and High Severities: A Nationwide Multicenter Prospective Registry

    Crit Care Med

    (2021)
  • J. Holgersson et al.

    Hypothermic versus Normothermic Temperature Control after Cardiac Arrest

    NEJM Evid

    (2022)
  • R.C. Choudhary et al.

    Pharmacological Approach for Neuroprotection After Cardiac Arrest-A Narrative Review of Current Therapies and Future Neuroprotective Cocktail

    Front Med (Lausanne)

    (2021)
  • R. Laitio et al.

    Effect of Inhaled Xenon on Cerebral White Matter Damage in Comatose Survivors of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Randomized Clinical Trial

    JAMA

    (2016)
  • T. Tanaka et al.

    IL-6 in inflammation, immunity, and disease

    Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol

    (2014)
  • Cited by (13)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text