Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 399, Issue 10338, 14–20 May 2022, Pages 1903-1916
The Lancet

Seminar
Suicide and self-harm

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00173-8Get rights and content

Summary

Suicide and self-harm are major health and societal issues worldwide, but the greatest burden of both behaviours occurs in low-income and middle-income countries. Although rates of suicide are higher in male than in female individuals, self-harm is more common in female individuals. Rather than having a single cause, suicide and self-harm are the result of a complex interplay of several factors that occur throughout the life course, and vary by gender, age, ethnicity, and geography. Several clinical and public health interventions show promise, although our understanding of their effectiveness has largely originated from high-income countries. Attempting to predict suicide is unlikely to be helpful. Intervention and prevention must include both a clinical and community focus, and every health professional has a crucial part to play.

Introduction

Data from WHO suggest that, globally, suicide accounts for at least 700 000 deaths per year. The actual number is likely to be much higher because of under-recording. Suicide has become a defining health and societal issue in many countries.1 Self-harm (self-poisoning or self-injury with varying degrees of suicidal intent) is even more common, with an estimated 14·6 million individuals affected each year.2 Suicide has received a great deal of attention during the COVID-19 public health emergency,3 and its prevention will continue to be a priority as we move into subsequent phases and eventual recovery from the pandemic.

Many people who die by suicide have a history of self-harm, and previous self-harm is the strongest risk factor for suicide, at least in high-income settings.4 Despite suicide and self-harm sometimes being seen as distinct concepts, here we discuss them together, given that many of the principles of intervention and prevention are common to both.

Suicide and self-harm are intensely individual experiences that are often markers of unbearable psychological pain; however, suicide and self-harm are also affected by societal factors. It has been known for at least a century that economic adversity is associated with higher suicide rates. Clinicians need to be at the forefront of suicide prevention efforts, because policy makers and the public will look towards clinicians for leadership, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Public health factors need to be recognised, and the role of mental and physical health must also be acknowledged—a proportion of people who die by suicide have a psychiatric disorder at the time of death, and many, particularly in older age groups (eg, those older than 65 years), have a physical illness.5, 6 Most of these individuals, at least in high-income settings, will have consulted health services in the year before they die,7 some having harmed themselves. Each clinical encounter should be seen as an opportunity to intervene.

Stigma remains a serious issue in clinical and non-clinical settings, and the language we use is important. Suicide might not be openly discussed, or might even be perceived as a selfish act. Many people who self-harm have a poor experience of health care: “In many cases, staff lacked compassion. Such as invalidating my distress, stigmatising responses such as ‘wow you really meant to kill yourself, didn't you!!', exclaiming at the severity of my previous scarring and saying I was ‘adding to the collection', saying that my pain threshold must be high and deciding not to give me any pain relief or medications when stitching or cleaning wounds (almost as if it was to be a punishment for self-harming), saying that I was ‘wasting time' and other people had ‘real' injuries.”8

Patients report that clinicians might blame them or deny them access to high quality care because of the erroneous belief that providing good care will encourage future episodes. Such attitudes might be partly related to a lack of knowledge and understanding. Clinicians also need to be aware that some individuals view their self-harm as a coping strategy to manage psychological distress or even prevent suicide.

In this Seminar we aim to provide an update on suicide and self-harm with a global and practical focus. We also discuss current and emerging issues. Further discussion of the terminology used throughout the Seminar and the importance of language are included in the appendix (pp 2–3).

Section snippets

Suicide

One person dies by suicide every 40 seconds,9 and for every person who dies, 60–135 people are affected by the death.10 The global rate of suicide is estimated to be 9·4 per 100 000 people (95% CI 8·5–10·3), with higher rates in male individuals (13·3 per 100 000 [11·3–14·7]) than female individuals (5·7 per 100 000 [5·1–6·4]).2 Possible explanations for higher rates in male individuals include methods of suicide (they might choose more dangerous methods with a higher case fatality than female

Risk factors

When someone dies by suicide or harms themselves, the most common question asked is why did it happen? Families, friends, and sometimes even the person who has harmed themselves might look to clinicians for answers. These answers are typically difficult to give. Suicide and self-harm are complex and never the result of a single cause. Many of the risk factors are non-specific and apply to suicide, self-harm, and psychological distress. Although it is useful for clinicians to have a broad

Clinical assessment

Following an incident of self-harm, a sensitively conducted assessment that pays close attention to establishing rapport can be therapeutic for patients.55 Patients emphasise the importance of feeling listened to, and these assessments can lead to better engagement with future treatment. Although evidence on the benefits of assessment is mostly focused on self-harm, many of the same principles will apply to patients presenting with suicidal thoughts. Confidentiality is an important issue, but

Psychological interventions

Research suggests psychological interventions might be effective in preventing self-harm and suicide,82, 83 although current evidence has substantial methodological limitations and is limited to HICs. Cognitive behavioural therapy and related treatments have the strongest evidence base for reducing suicidal ideation and repeat self-harm compared with treatment as usual.82 Dialectical behavioural therapy, an intensive psychological intervention that incorporates principles of cognitive

Conclusion

Suicide is an individual tragedy as well as a global concern. Suicide prevention must encompass both a clinical and societal focus. Every health professional has a crucial part to play, whether by sensitively assessing or treating self-harm, or advocating for the implementation of suicide prevention measures. Current and emerging threats, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, migration, and climate change, will have an effect on suicide and self-harm. Ageing populations, the use of data and new

Search strategy and selection criteria

We searched MEDLINE and Embase for articles published between June 1, 2015, and Jan 31, 2021, using the indexed terms “suicide” and “self-harm” in combination with section specific terms, which included “epidemiology”, “risk factors”, “prevention”, and “intervention”. We gave precedence to publications within the past 5 years and systematic reviews identified through these searches. We do, however, also reference highly cited older publications. Relevant contemporary review articles and book

Declaration of interests

DK is funded through the Elizabeth Blackwell Institute for Health Research at the University of Bristol, which is supported by the Wellcome Trust. DK is also in receipt of a grant from the Centre for Pesticide Suicide Prevention. PP's PhD clinical fellowship is funded by the UK Medical Research Council Addiction Research Clinical Training programme, grant number MR/N00616X/1. PP is also in receipt of a grant from Bristol and Weston Hospitals Charity. LFC declares receiving funding from Johnson

References (142)

  • B Mars et al.

    Predictors of future suicide attempt among adolescents with suicidal thoughts or non-suicidal self-harm: a population-based birth cohort study

    Lancet Psychiatry

    (2019)
  • LF Chan et al.

    Are predictors of future suicide attempts and the transition from suicidal ideation to suicide attempts shared or distinct: a 12-month prospective study among patients with depressive disorders

    Psychiatry Res

    (2014)
  • J-M Cairns et al.

    Area-level socioeconomic disadvantage and suicidal behaviour in Europe: a systematic review

    Soc Sci Med

    (2017)
  • J McLaughlin et al.

    Intimate partner abuse and suicidality: a systematic review

    Clin Psychol Rev

    (2012)
  • K Hughes et al.

    The effect of multiple adverse childhood experiences on health: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Lancet Public Health

    (2017)
  • D Gunnell et al.

    Prevention of suicide with regulations aimed at restricting access to highly hazardous pesticides: a systematic review of the international evidence

    Lancet Glob Health

    (2017)
  • K Hawton et al.

    Impact of the recent recession on self-harm: longitudinal ecological and patient-level investigation from the Multicentre Study of Self-harm in England

    J Affect Disord

    (2016)
  • N Watts et al.

    The 2020 report of The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: responding to converging crises

    Lancet

    (2021)
  • S Walker et al.

    Clinical and social factors associated with increased risk for involuntary psychiatric hospitalisation: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and narrative synthesis

    Lancet Psychiatry

    (2019)
  • J Graney et al.

    Suicide risk assessment in UK mental health services: a national mixed-methods study

    Lancet Psychiatry

    (2020)
  • D Knipe et al.

    Risk of suicide and repeat self-harm after hospital attendance for non-fatal self-harm in Sri Lanka: a cohort study

    Lancet Psychiatry

    (2019)
  • D Wasserman et al.

    The European Psychiatric Association (EPA) guidance on suicide treatment and prevention

    Eur Psychiatry

    (2012)
  • RD Gibbons et al.

    Computerized adaptive tests for rapid and accurate assessment of psychopathology dimensions in youth

    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry

    (2020)
  • A Erlangsen et al.

    Short-term and long-term effects of psychosocial therapy for people after deliberate self-harm: a register-based, nationwide multicentre study using propensity score matching

    Lancet Psychiatry

    (2015)
  • CR DeCou et al.

    Dialectical behavior therapy is effective for the treatment of suicidal behavior: a meta-analysis

    Behav Ther

    (2019)
  • M Torok et al.

    Suicide prevention using self-guided digital interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

    Lancet Digit Health

    (2020)
  • J Hennen et al.

    Suicidal risk during treatment with clozapine: a meta-analysis

    Schizophr Res

    (2005)
  • Suicide worldwide in 2019: global health estimates

    (2021)
  • Global Burden of Disease study 2019 (GBD 2019) results

    (2020)
  • R Carroll et al.

    Hospital presenting self-harm and risk of fatal and non-fatal repetition: systematic review and meta-analysis

    PLoS One

    (2014)
  • BK Ahmedani et al.

    Variation in patterns of health care before suicide: a population case-control study

    Prev Med

    (2019)
  • LM Quinlivan et al.

    ‘Relieved to be seen’-patient and carer experiences of psychosocial assessment in the emergency department following self-harm: qualitative analysis of 102 free-text survey responses

    BMJ Open

    (2021)
  • Preventing suicide—a global imperative

    (2014)
  • J Cerel et al.

    How many people are exposed to suicide? Not six

    Suicide Life Threat Behav

    (2019)
  • N Kapur et al.

    Suicide prevention

    (2019)
  • Suicides in England and Wales: 2020 registrations

  • M Naghavi

    Global, regional, and national burden of suicide mortality 1990 to 2016: systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease study 2016

    BMJ

    (2019)
  • Suicides in England and Wales: 2019 registrations

  • Method used in completed suicide in Hong Kong 1999–2019

  • Suicide

  • T Vos et al.

    Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019

    Lancet

    (2020)
  • MJ Carr et al.

    The epidemiology of self-harm in a UK-wide primary care patient cohort, 2001–2013

    BMC Psychiatry

    (2016)
  • RJ Cramer et al.

    A social-ecological framework of theory, assessment, and prevention of suicide

    Front Psychol

    (2017)
  • A Erlangsen et al.

    Genetics of suicide attempts in individuals with and without mental disorders: a population-based genome-wide association study

    Mol Psychiatry

    (2020)
  • G Turecki

    The molecular bases of the suicidal brain

    Nat Rev Neurosci

    (2014)
  • LJ Steinberg et al.

    Abnormal stress responsiveness and suicidal behavior: a risk phenotype

    Biomark Neuropsychiatry

    (2020)
  • A Szücs et al.

    Personality and suicidal behavior in old age: a systematic literature review

    Front Psychiatry

    (2018)
  • C Richardson et al.

    A systematic review of suicidal behaviour in men: a narrative synthesis of risk factors

    Soc Sci Med

    (2021)
  • P Qin et al.

    Suicide risk in relation to socioeconomic, demographic, psychiatric, and familial factors: a national register-based study of all suicides in Denmark, 1981–1997

    Am J Psychiatry

    (2003)
  • A Milner et al.

    Suicide by occupation: systematic review and meta-analysis

    Br J Psychiatry

    (2013)
  • Cited by (90)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text